Text Attached As PDF Part One Choose One Of The United State

Text Attached As Pdfpart Onechoose One Of The United States Of Ame

Choose one of the United States of America Presidents (past or present) as the subject matter. Explain whether his leadership style is transactional or transformational. What type of leadership characteristics does he demonstrate? What aspects of servant leadership does he exhibit? Provide relevant examples to support your claims.

Must be: 3-4 pages (excluding title and reference pages). At least two scholarly references plus the course textbook must be utilized in the research (attached). The paper should also reflect proper APA format

Part two Examine key concepts of leadership in a Military setting (or in a social organization—motorcycle race team). Include the following in the paper: Apply one of the leadership theories from the course text to the organization. Explain how the theory works and include an example.

Explain the effect of power and influence that leaders have on followers in the organization. Are the followers receptive? Would you recommend another strategy? Explain your reasoning. If not, why not?

Evaluate the role and effectiveness of transformational and transactional leadership in the organization. Support your (claims, points?) with examples (from?). Assess the traits and characteristics of an effective team leader within the organization. Explain how the leadership supports vision, mission, and strategy in the organization. If you were the leader in the organization, what would you change and why?

Must be: 8-10 pages (excluding the title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis. Must use at least three scholarly sources (other than the text), Must document all sources in APA style.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment is divided into two parts, each requiring a comprehensive analysis of leadership from different perspectives. The first part focuses on a U.S. President, analyzing his leadership style—whether transactional or transformational—and identifying characteristics and examples that support the classification. It also involves examining aspects of servant leadership demonstrated by the president. The second part broadens the scope to explore leadership within an organizational context, either in a military setting or a social organization like a motorcycle race team, applying leadership theories, discussing power and influence, and evaluating the effectiveness of different leadership styles through specific examples. The paper should be well-structured, beginning with an introduction that states the thesis, developing arguments with scholarly support, and concluding with a reaffirmation of the main points, all formatted according to APA standards.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Leadership is a multifaceted phenomenon that manifests uniquely across different contexts and individuals. Understanding leadership requires examining specific styles, characteristics, and theories to appreciate how leaders influence followers and facilitate organizational or national objectives. This paper explores two interconnected themes: firstly, evaluating the leadership style of a U.S. president—whether transactional or transformational—and identifying associated traits and servant leadership qualities. Secondly, it analyzes leadership in an organizational setting, applying leadership theories, assessing influence, and recommending strategies to enhance effectiveness. By integrating scholarly sources and course materials, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of leadership dynamics in both political and organizational spheres.

Part One: Leadership Style of a U.S. President

For this analysis, I have chosen President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), whose leadership significantly impacted the United States during critical periods such as the Great Depression and World War II. Roosevelt’s leadership exemplifies a predominantly transformational style, characterized by inspiring vision, fostering innovation, and motivating the nation toward shared goals. His Fireside Chats, for instance, exemplified his ability to communicate directly with citizens, instilling confidence and collective purpose, hallmarks of transformational leadership (Bass & Riggio, 2006). FDR demonstrated traits such as resilience, empathy, and decisiveness—traits essential for transformational leaders to inspire followers, especially in times of crisis.

Roosevelt also exhibited characteristics of transactional leadership, particularly in his administration's pragmatic policies and negotiations with Congress to pass New Deal programs. These actions prioritized structured exchanges—policy supports in return for public compliance—aligning with transactional principles (Burns, 1978). A clear example is his use of bargaining and political bargaining to secure legislative support, demonstrating transactional interactions based on reward and punishment.

In terms of servant leadership, FDR showed concern for the welfare of the American people and prioritized their needs above his own. He championed social reforms aimed at alleviating poverty and economic despair, embodying servant leadership qualities such as empathy, stewardship, and a commitment to service (Greenleaf, 1977). His leadership during WWII further exemplified servant leadership traits, as he sought to serve the nation’s interests and uphold democratic values, even amid personal and national hardship.

Part Two: Leadership in an Organizational Context

Transitioning to organizational leadership, I focus on the leadership within the U.S. military, examining the application of transformational and transactional styles in this high-stakes environment. Specifically, I analyze the role of transformational leadership in fostering innovation, morale, and adaptability among soldiers, supported by Burns’ (1978) leadership theory, which emphasizes inspiring followers toward higher ideals and collective goals.

In the military organization, transformational leaders articulate a compelling vision, motivate personnel through shared values, and encourage personal development (Northouse, 2018). For example, senior officers often inspire soldiers to overcome adversity and work towards a mission’s success, emphasizing purpose and morale. Conversely, transactional leadership remains prevalent in routine operations, where clear directives and reward systems ensure discipline and task completion (Bass & Avolio, 1994).

The influence of power and influence in such settings is profound; leaders leverage both positional authority and referent power to motivate followers. Receptivity among followers varies based on shared goals and trust levels. In situations where trust is high, followers are more receptive to transformational appeals, fostering cohesion and commitment (Yukl, 2012). When trust falters, reliance on transactional exchanges may be more effective, but this can limit innovation and long-term engagement.

Regarding leadership strategies, I recommend a balanced approach that emphasizes transformational leadership to inspire and develop personnel, complemented by transactional methods for operational consistency. This hybrid approach aligns with organizational demands and has been shown to enhance performance and morale (Avolio & Bass, 2004). For example, leaders who foster a shared vision while maintaining clear accountability tend to develop more effective teams.

Traits and Leadership Supporting Organizational Vision

Effective team leaders in military or social organizations demonstrate traits such as emotional intelligence, decisiveness, integrity, adaptability, and strong communication skills. These traits enable leaders to unify teams toward common objectives, support the organization’s mission, and adapt to dynamic circumstances. Leadership that articulates a clear vision and integrates it into daily routines fosters alignment and engagement among followers (Goleman, 1995).

If I were in a leadership position, I would emphasize greater emphasis on transformational strategies—such as mentoring and empowering team members—to enhance innovation, job satisfaction, and resilience. This shift could inspire higher levels of commitment and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Additionally, I would advocate for ongoing leadership development programs to cultivate adaptability and emotional intelligence, which are critical in complex organizational environments.

Conclusion

Leadership is a vital force shaping both national and organizational outcomes. The case of President Roosevelt illustrates how transformational and servant leadership qualities can influence a nation during times of crisis, inspiring resilience and service. In organizational contexts like the military, a balanced approach that combines transformational and transactional strategies fosters motivation, discipline, and innovation. Effective leaders leverage traits such as emotional intelligence and integrity to align organizational efforts with overarching missions and visions. Recognizing these dynamics and adjusting leadership strategies accordingly can significantly enhance organizational effectiveness and societal progress.

References

• Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Manual. Mind Garden.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th Ed.). Sage Publications.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in Organizations (8th Ed.). Pearson.