The Accompanying Table Shows Total Donations And Average Don

The accompanying table shows how total donations, average donations, total labor costs and average labor costs vary depending on the number of employees

The assignment requires analyzing a table that illustrates the relationship between the number of employees hired by State U for its fundraising activities and various financial metrics such as total donations, average donations, total labor costs, and average labor costs. The tasks involve performing calculations based on the data, interpreting the relationships among different variables, and evaluating marginal and net benefits associated with hiring additional employees.

Specifically, the tasks include calculating the total donations raised by three employees, determining the total labor costs with four employees, analyzing the relationship between average benefits and average costs, evaluating the marginal benefit of the second employee, explaining how the marginal cost of the fourth employee affects total labor costs, and identifying when the net benefit from hiring fundraisers is maximized.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of fundraising efficiency and personnel management at State U requires a systematic approach to interpreting the provided data and applying economic principles to decision-making. Given the table that reports total donations, average donations, total labor costs, and average labor costs at various levels of staffing, multiple insights can be generated regarding optimal hiring strategies and resource allocation.

Calculating Total Donations by Three Employees

The first step is to determine the total amount of donations generated when three employees are hired. Typically, the total donations can be derived by multiplying the average donation per employee by the number of employees. Alternatively, if the table provides total donations directly for each staffing level, that figure can be used. For instance, if the table indicates that at three employees, the average donation is $X, then the total donation equals:

Total Donations = Average Donation per Employee × Number of Employees

This calculation is straightforward but assumes the average donation remains consistent at three employees. If the data indicates total donations directly, then no further calculation is needed. Explaining the method involves clarifying whether the total donation is obtained by multiplying average donation by number of employees or is directly provided in the table.

Calculating Total Labor Cost with Four Employees

Similarly, the total labor cost at four employees can be computed using the average labor cost per employee. If the table provides the average labor cost per employee, then the total labor cost equals:

Total Labor Cost = Average Labor Cost per Employee × Number of Employees

Alternatively, if total labor costs are directly reported at the four-employee level, that figure is used directly. Explaining this calculation involves highlighting the relationship between average costs and total costs and clarifying that the total cost scales linearly with the number of employees, assuming constant average costs.

Analyzing the Relationship Between Average Benefits and Average Costs

The statement „If the President of State U decides to hire fundraising employees as long as their average benefit exceeds their average cost, then this results in ________ employees being hired and a net benefit (total donations minus total labor costs) of ________“ requires filling in the blanks based on the data. Based on the table, if the average benefit per employee (likely represented by average donations or some other metric) exceeds the average labor cost, then hiring continues. The number of employees hired corresponds to the staffing level where this condition holds true.

The net benefit is calculated as:

Net Benefit = Total Donations - Total Labor Costs

By identifying the maximum point where the average benefit exceeds average costs, the hiring decision and resulting net benefit can be deduced. This approach involves comparing the values provided for each staffing level and determining the point where additional hires no longer produce positive net benefits or where the benefit-cost ratio begins to decline.

Evaluating the Marginal Benefit of the Second Employee

The marginal benefit of adding the second employee refers to the additional donations generated by hiring this employee, over and above the donations generated by the first employee. Formally, it is calculated as:

Marginal Benefit = Total Donations with 2 employees - Total Donations with 1 employee

This calculation assesses how much extra fundraising capacity the second employee adds, providing insights into the efficiency of additional staffing in generating donations. Analyzing whether the marginal benefit is decreasing or increasing as more employees are hired helps determine the optimal workforce size.

Impact of the Marginal Cost of the Fourth Employee

The marginal cost of hiring the fourth employee is the additional expense incurred by that hire. Typically, it is reflected in an increase in total labor costs from hiring the fourth employee compared to three employees:

Marginal Cost = Total Labor Cost with 4 employees - Total Labor Cost with 3 employees

As each employee is added, the marginal cost may increase if, for example, additional benefits or higher wages are paid, or if declining efficiency causes the costs to rise disproportionately. This increased marginal cost impacts the overall total labor cost, influencing decisions about the optimal number of employees to hire. When marginal costs exceed marginal benefits, hiring additional employees becomes inefficient.

Determining When the Net Benefit Is the Largest

The largest net benefit occurs at the staffing level where the difference between total donations and total labor costs is maximized. This entails analyzing the net benefit at each staffing level and identifying where it peaks. Mathematically:

Maximize: Net Benefit = Total Donations - Total Labor Costs

and find the staffing level at which this value achieves its maximum. This point indicates the most efficient staffing level in terms of maximizing fundraising net gains, reflecting the optimal balance between increased donations and associated labor costs.

Conclusion

Effective resource management at State U's fundraising efforts hinges on understanding the relationship between staffing levels and monetary outcomes. Calculations of total donations and labor costs provide foundational insights, while the analysis of marginal benefits and costs inform strategic decisions about optimal workforce size. Recognizing where the net benefit reaches its peak ensures that staff hiring aligns with maximizing net gains, thereby improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the university's fundraising initiatives.

References

• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. John Wiley & Sons.
• Gruber, J. (2011). Public Finance and Public Policy. Worth Publishers.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (9th ed.). W.W. Norton & Company.
• Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press.
• Laffer, A. B. (2004). The Laffer Curve: Past, Present, and Future. The Heritage Foundation.
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
• Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1971). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Prentice Hall.
• Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press.