The Average Base Salary For A Store Manager At Walmart In Ri

The Average Base Salary For A Store Manager Wal Mart In Riverside C

The average base salary for a store manager (Wal-Mart) in Riverside, California, is $68,000, and the average base salary for a store manager (Wal-Mart) in Los Angeles, California, is $78,000. Assume that salaries are normally distributed, with standard deviations of $20,000 for Riverside and $22,000 for Los Angeles. The problem asks to determine the probabilities associated with specific salary thresholds and to analyze salary comparisons between these locations. Additionally, it asks for recommendations on salary negotiation strategies based on the statistical insights derived from these probabilities and salary distributions.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the salary distributions of store managers in Riverside and Los Angeles provides critical insights into the compensation landscape within Wal-Mart stores in California. The normal distribution assumption facilitates the calculation of probabilities concerning salary thresholds and enables potential job candidates to strategize effectively during negotiations. This analysis involves computing the likelihood of salaries exceeding or falling below certain benchmarks and translating these statistical findings into practical negotiation tactics.

The first task involves calculating the probability that a store manager in Riverside earns more than $100,000. Given the mean salary of $68,000 and a standard deviation of $20,000, this is a typical z-score problem. The z-score is calculated by subtracting the mean from the salary and dividing by the standard deviation: z = (X - μ) / σ. Here, z = (100,000 - 68,000) / 20,000 = 32,000 / 20,000 = 1.6. Using standard normal distribution tables or software, the probability that Z exceeds 1.6 is approximately 0.055 that is, about 5.5%. This indicates that there is a 5.5% chance that a Riverside store manager earns over $100,000, suggesting such salaries are relatively rare but possible.

Similarly, for Los Angeles, where the mean salary is $78,000 and the standard deviation is $22,000, the probability of earning more than $100,000 can be calculated. The z-score here is (100,000 - 78,000) / 22,000 ≈ 22,000 / 22,000 = 1.0. The probability that Z is greater than 1.0 is about 0.1587, or 15.87%. This higher likelihood compared to Riverside reflects the higher average salary and variability in Los Angeles, making high salaries somewhat more attainable.

The third probability assesses the likelihood that a store manager in Los Angeles earns less than $67,000. The z-score is (67,000 - 78,000) / 22,000 ≈ -11,000 / 22,000 ≈ -0.5. The probability that Z is less than -0.5 is approximately 0.3085, or 30.85%. Thus, nearly a third of Los Angeles store managers earn less than $67,000, emphasizing salary disparities within the city.

The final problem involves determining the salary threshold in Los Angeles to be higher than 98.21% of Riverside store managers. First, identify the z-score corresponding to the 98.21% percentile, which is approximately 2.07 from standard normal tables. Using the z-score formula, the salary X = μ + zσ = 78,000 + 2.07 × 22,000 ≈ 78,000 + 45,540 ≈ $123,540. This figure implies that to be among the top 1.79% of Los Angeles store managers, one would need to earn roughly $123,540 or more, significantly above the average salary.

From the analysis above, it is clear that salary expectations vary considerably between Riverside and Los Angeles, influenced by factors including location, cost of living, and company pay structures. As a job applicant, understanding these statistics provides leverage during salary negotiations. For example, knowing that a salary of around $124,000 places a manager among the top earners in Los Angeles suggests that aiming for a salary in this range could position one favorably relative to peers. Moreover, recognizing the low probability (around 5.5%) of earning over $100,000 in Riverside alerts candidates that such high salaries are exceptional, and negotiations should be based on realistic market statistics.

Candidates should also leverage the percentile insights: emphasizing their unique qualifications, leadership skills, and experience to justify higher-than-average salaries. Presenting data-driven evidence of value addition to the store can persuade employers to offer salaries toward the upper percentile. Additionally, understanding that a significant proportion of Los Angeles managers earn less than $67,000 can serve as a strategic benchmark, fueling arguments for higher compensation based on demonstrated performance or additional responsibilities.

In conclusion, using statistical insights about salary distributions enables prospective employees to negotiate more effectively. Knowing the likelihood of earning above certain thresholds and the salary needed to be among the top earners helps frame realistic and compelling salary requests. Ultimately, a combination of market knowledge, demonstrated competence, and strategic negotiation tactics informed by statistical analysis can significantly enhance a job applicant’s negotiating power.

References

• Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2014). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Pearson.
• Meyers, L. S. (2019). Experiments & Data Analysis for Behavioral Science. Routledge.
• Siegel, S., & Castella, J. (2013). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ross, S. M. (2014). Introduction to Probability Models. Academic Press.
• Walpole, R. E., Myers, R. H., Myers, S. L., & Ye, K. (2012). Probability & Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Pearson.
• Everitt, B. S., & Skrondal, A. (2010). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2013). Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Springer.
• Ott, L., & Longnecker, M. (2010). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Brooks/Cole.
• Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied Linear Statistical Models. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.