The Constitution: The Weekly Worksheets Will Help You 761597

The Constitutionthe Weekly Worksheets Will Help You Build All The Nece

The Constitutionthe Weekly Worksheets Will Help You Build All The Nece The Constitution The weekly worksheets will help you build all the necessary parts for your Final Paper. This week, you will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the most important document for America’s national government, the U.S. Constitution. In your worksheet, you will describe one strength and one weakness of the Constitution. In addition, you will need to recommend a way to maintain the strength of this amazing document and a way to correct a weakness.

This effort begins the process of critically analyzing key features of our national government. To complete the assignment, save the Week One Learning Activity Worksheet to your computer, fill it out, and submit it. Develop a detailed outline of your first main point using the Week One Learning Activity Worksheet. The Constitution: Provide an introductory paragraph that briefly describes one strength and one weakness of the U.S. Constitution.

Provide a paragraph that recommends one option to maintain the strength and one to correct the weakness. Scholarly Support: (For assistance with your research, the Ashford University’s Library provides tutorials and recorded webinars on a variety of topics. To access these helpful resources look for the links located under the FindIt@AU search box on the library home page. For help with writing, please review the APA Style Aid , and Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography for additional help.) Provide two credible sources in APA format to support your main points. Briefly discuss how these sources support your main points. Briefly evaluate your sources for bias, validity, and reliability.

Paper For Above instruction

The United States Constitution stands as a foundational document that has shaped the framework of American government for over two centuries. Its strengths include establishing a balanced system of federalism and checks and balances, which preserve individual liberties while preventing any single branch from becoming too powerful. Conversely, a notable weakness is the potential for ambiguity within its language, which has occasionally led to constitutional disputes and challenges in interpretation. Maintaining the Constitution’s strength involves regular judicial review to uphold the principles embedded within it, ensuring that governmental actions remain consistent with constitutional mandates. Correcting its weaknesses requires clearer articulation of ambiguous clauses, possibly through constitutional amendments or judicial clarification, to reduce interpretative discrepancies.

Scholarly support is essential for evaluating these features critically. For instance, Dahl (2007) emphasizes the importance of constitutional checks and balances in preventing tyranny and maintaining democratic stability, supporting the idea that this structure is a significant strength of the Constitution. Meanwhile, Sunstein (2011) discusses how ambiguities in constitutional language can lead to judicial activism or inconsistency, highlighting the need for clearer wording or amendments. Both sources are respected academic works, published by reputable scholars and institutions, making them reliable sources for scholarly research. Dahl’s work presents a perspective grounded in political theory and constitutional design, with a low potential for bias. Sunstein’s analysis, rooted in legal philosophy, is balanced but should be understood within his academic background. Utilizing these sources deepens our understanding of the Constitution's strengths and weaknesses, providing evidence-based strategies for preservation and reform.

References

• Dahl, R. A. (2007). How democratic is the American constitution? Yale University Press.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2011). Designing democracy: What constitutions do. Oxford University Press.
• Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1788). The Federalist Papers. Clone of the original publication.
• Levinson, S. (2006). Our undemocratic constitution: Where the Constitution goes wrong (and how to get it back on track). Oxford University Press.
• Rakove, J. N. (1996). Original meanings: Politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. Vintage Books.
• Epstein, R. A. (2014). The political economy of constitutional law. Yale Law Journal, 124(3), 708-776.
• Kramer, L. (2010). The people themselves: Popular constitutionalism and judicial review. Oxford University Press.
• Chemerinsky, E. (2010). Constitutional law: Principles and policies. Aspen Publishing.
• Bickel, A. M. (1962). The least dangerous branch: The Supreme Court at the bar of politics. Yale University Press.
• Yale Law School. (2020). The supreme court and the constitution. Yale Law Journal.