The Degenerate Art Show: This Documentary Explains How The ✓ Solved

The Degenerate Art Show This documentary explains how the

The Degenerate Art Show documentary explains how the art world was attacked during the rise of the Third Reich. Many of us are familiar with the history of WWII and have seen a lot of documentaries, but what makes this one different is it specifically focuses on how Hitler attacked the arts in particular; music, theater, film, and the fine arts. Art has a power to communicate great passion, passion in the sense of being for or against something.

1) What did you learn about the Nazi party and their attack on the Modern Art world? What was your reaction to the film?

2) Had you known before that Hitler wanted to be an artist and didn't get into art school? What did he consider "good art" to be?

3) Why do you think Hitler feared Modern Art? Why would he not want artists to experiment and be expressive?

4) Who else did he attack in the arts? Was it just painters, or other artistic disciplines? Name a few.

5) Why did Hitler collect art from all over the world and what was it mostly of?

Paper For Above Instructions

The documentary "The Degenerate Art Show" provides an insightful exploration of the ways in which the Nazi Party sought to undermine modern art and suppress artistic expression during the rise of the Third Reich. Through a detailed narrative and visual representation, the film elucidates the ideological underpinnings of the Nazi regime's disdain for modern artistic movements, illustrating how such art contradicted their vision of a culturally and racially homogenous society.

One of the foremost insights presented in the documentary is the Nazi Party's systematic attack on modern art as a vehicle of expression that threatened their authoritarian ideals. Modern art, characterized by its emphasis on abstraction, experimentation, and individual creativity, was deemed "degenerate" by Hitler and his followers. The film highlighted the infamous Degenerate Art Exhibition of 1937, which showcased works from various artists such as Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, and Emil Nolde, as a means of deriding and discrediting modern art. My reaction to the film was one of both shock and profound sadness, as it illustrated the destructive power of political ideology to stifle creativity and imagination.

Prior to watching the film, I was unaware that Hitler aspired to be an artist and faced rejection from art school. The film reveals that he considered "good art" to embody strict adherence to traditionalism, symmetry, and a clear representation of reality, devoid of the emotional or abstract elements that characterized modern art. This perspective not only reflects Hitler's personal tastes but also his broader agenda to enforce a singular cultural narrative that aligned with the values of the Aryan race.

Hitler's fear of modern art stemmed from its ability to foster independent thought and critique authority. He recognized that artists who experimented and expressed their individuality posed a threat to his regime's grip on power, as creative expression often promotes reflection and challenges the status quo. Consequently, the suppression of modern art became a means of asserting control over culture and ideology.

The documentary also delineates the wider scope of artistic persecution under the Nazi regime, which extended beyond painters to other artistic disciplines. Musicians, filmmakers, and playwrights also fell victim to censorship and persecution. For instance, avant-garde composers like Arnold Schoenberg and film directors such as Fritz Lang were targeted for their unconventional approaches and Jewish heritage. This systematic eradication of diverse artistic expressions served to reinforce a monolithic cultural framework that excluded dissent.

Interestingly, while the Nazis were vehemently opposed to modern art, Hitler himself was an avid collector of art from various cultures. The film points out that his collections predominantly featured traditional and classical works, often glorifying ideals associated with strength and beauty in accordance with his racial and cultural doctrines. This duality—where Hitler vilified modern artistic expressions while simultaneously engaging in the collection of art—underscores a broader paradox within the regime's relationship with culture.

In conclusion, "The Degenerate Art Show" serves as a poignant reminder of the vital role that art plays in society and the potential consequences of its suppression. By examining the Nazi Party's assault on modern art, the documentary not only highlights historical injustices but also evokes contemporary reflections on the importance of artistic freedom and the dangers posed by authoritarian ideologies.

References

• Adorno, T.W. (1997). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Routledge.
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso.
• Draper, H. (2013). Art and the Third Reich: The Fate of Art in the Nazi Era. Praeger Publishers.
• Foster, H. (1996). The Return of the Real: Art and Theory at the End of the Century. MIT Press.
• Gauguin, P. (2015). Gauguin: The Other Side of the Porcelain. Flammarion.
• Greenberg, C. (1986). The Collected Essays and Criticism, Volume 1: Perceptions and Judgments, 1939-1944. University of Chicago Press.
• Heller, A. (2015). Art and Politics in the Third Reich. Yale University Press.
• Krauss, R. (2000). A Voyage on the North Sea: Art in the Age of the Post-Medium Condition. Thames & Hudson.
• McCarthy, C. (2001). Modern Art in the Time of Fascism. Art Journal, 60(3), 27-35.
• Rubel, L. (2018). Art and Power: The Role of the Arts in the Nazi State. Cambridge University Press.