The Death Of Antigone By Joseph S. Margon ✓ Solved

The Death of Antigone Author(s): Joseph S. Margon

The Death of Antigone by Joseph S. Margon discusses the implications of Creon's actions regarding Antigone's fate in Sophocles' play. It explores whether Creon could have saved Antigone if he had prioritized her release over the burial of Polyneices, a significant question that has received limited attention from scholars.

Some scholars argue that Antigone's death could have been prevented while others believe it was inevitable. Margon critically examines these perspectives, noting that we cannot definitively establish whether Creon's choices impacted Antigone's fate.

Initial evidence, such as Teiresias' prophecy, suggests that despite Creon's eventual compliance with the seer, Antigone's death may have been unavoidable. The uncertainty around the timing of her suicide and Creon’s actions creates ambiguity regarding the potential for her salvation.

Paper For Above Instructions

The plot of Sophocles' "Antigone" essentially revolves around the tragic downfall of the titular character, Antigone, who defies King Creon’s orders by burying her brother Polyneices. The complexity lies in the ramifications of this act of defiance and whether it was destined to occur regardless of Creon’s actions. Joseph S. Margon, through his examination of the text, argues that the inevitability of Antigone's death is intertwined with themes of fate and the consequences of human actions.

Margon reflects on the broader implications of Creon’s choices, specifically if he could have saved Antigone had he acted differently. For scholars who argue that Antigone’s demise could have been averted, the focus is often on the assumption that she might have survived if Creon had chosen to free her before honoring Polyneices. They suggest that Creon’s bureaucratic delays contributed to the tragedy. However, Margon cautions against such assertions, emphasizing the lack of definitive timelines in the text, which prevents a concrete conclusion.

This exploration addresses key dramatic moments in the play that support the argument of inevitability. For instance, the prophecy by Teiresias poses profound questions. In the tense exchange between Creon and the seer, Teiresias warns of dire consequences if Creon does not heed divine law. However, even as he fulfills part of the prophecy by deciding to bury Polyneices, the tragic outcome remains unchanged. This could suggest that Creon’s actions, while heeding moral warnings, could not alter the cosmic order that dictated Antigone’s fate.

Furthermore, it is essential to note the character dynamics, especially Creon's transformation throughout the narrative. At the beginning of the play, he portrays an authoritarian figure, bent on enforcing his edicts at any cost, thereby representing state law and order. As the narrative unfolds, however, this resolute character is faced with catastrophic losses that bring about a profound shift. The deaths of Haemon and Eurydice serve as ultimate punishments that reinforce the tragic fate surrounding Creon, even though he yields to Teiresias. These moments underline the inherent tragedy of the human condition—as some things remain beyond control, no matter the choices made.

Moreover, Margon contextualizes Antigone's motivations against the societal expectations of her time. Her determination to grant her brother a proper burial signifies her commitment to familial and divine duties. Nevertheless, this defiance poses a grave risk as she stands against Creon's decree. While Antigone embodies virtue and righteousness in her beliefs, her actions ultimately challenge the political authority, leading to catastrophic consequences. This moral complexity encourages profound discussions on the rightful balance between individual conviction and civic duty.

The intersection of fate and free will plays a critical role in determining the characters’ destinies. Throughout the play, Sophocles weaves a narrative where human decisions are subject to the greater will of the gods. The tragic irony emerges as characters grapple with their choices while being ensnared in a fate they cannot escape. Margon’s analysis pushes readers to contemplate the extent of individual agency in the face of predestined outcomes.

In conclusion, Joseph S. Margon’s exploration of "Antigone" invites us to reflect upon this timeless tragedy. The ultimate question remains: could Creon have saved Antigone? Margon suggests that despite the scholarly divisions on this question, textual evidence hints at a deeper inevitability. This omnipresent theme of fate invites readers to recognize the cautionary tales embedded in ancient Greek tragedies, reflecting the enduring struggle between man’s desires and the rigid structures of fate. The play ultimately serves as a reminder of the potential consequences when individuals confront authority without regard for the often unforgiving nature of fate.

References

• Margon, Joseph S. "The Death of Antigone." California Studies in Classical Antiquity.
• Greene, W. C. "Moira: Fate, Good, and Evil in Greek Thought." New York and Evanston.
• Adams, S. M. "Sophocles the Playwright." Toronto.
• Linforth, Ivan. "Antigone and Creon." University of California Publications in Classical Philology.
• MacKay, Euan. "Antigone, Coriolanus, and Hegel." TAPA.
• Jebb, Richard C. "Sophocles: The Plays and Fragments." Amsterdam, 1962.
• Bowra, C. M. "Sophoclean Tragedy." Oxford.
• Knox, Bernard. "The Heroic Temper." Berkeley.
• Kirkwood, G. M. "A Study of Sophoclean Drama." Ithaca.
• Pohlenz, Max. "Die Griechische Tragodie." Leipzig and Berlin.