The Documentary Makes Clear How Psychological Knowledge Work
The Documentary Makes Clear How Psychological Knowledge L
The documentary makes clear how psychological knowledge leads to consumer manipulation. In approximately 200 words, what did you find most surprising about this historical look at our society? question 2: Some of the manipulation techniques seem rather blatant compared to the sophisticated way media is constructed today. In approximately 200 words, describe any similarities that you see between earlier efforts to manipulate the individuals to consume or behave in desired ways and what you see in contemporary society. video link: part 1: part 2: part 3:
Paper For Above instruction
The documentary provides a compelling historical perspective on how psychological principles have been employed to influence consumer behavior and societal conformity. One of the most surprising aspects was the extent of manipulation used in earlier times, often through blatant and direct methods such as propaganda, subliminal messages, and targeted advertising. These strategies reveal a deliberate attempt to exploit psychological vulnerabilities to shape public perception and consumption patterns. For example, the use of fear appeals or emotional appeals in advertisements aimed to bypass rational evaluation, tapping directly into subconscious desires. What stood out was how openly these techniques were employed compared to today’s media landscape, which appears more sophisticated yet equally manipulative. This historical insight highlights that while methods have evolved, the core goal of influencing individual choices remains constant. It was surprising to see how psychological research was used not just commercially but also politically, demonstrating the broad impact of psychological manipulation on societal structures. This understanding fosters a critical awareness of media influence, prompting viewers to question the motives behind various messages encountered daily. Overall, the historical perspective underscores the enduring power of psychology in shaping societal behavior, often in subtle and overt ways.
The continuity between past and present manipulation techniques is striking. Early advertising and propaganda heavily relied on direct emotional appeals, sensationalism, and fear tactics, which are still prevalent today, although more refined. Modern media employs sophisticated data analytics and targeting algorithms to personalize messages, creating a sense of relevance and immediacy that can influence individual decisions subtly and pervasively. For example, social media platforms utilize behavioral data to tailor advertising, a continuation of earlier intentions to influence consumer behavior but now backed by technology that can precisely target specific groups or individuals. Additionally, sensationalist content and emotional appeals persist, often designed to evoke strong reactions that drive engagement and consumption. The use of influencers and celebrity endorsements echoes earlier celebrity-endorsed advertising but now leverages social proof and social data for greater impact. Despite the increased sophistication, the fundamental techniques—playing on emotions, fears, and desires—remain remarkably similar. This continuity illustrates that manipulative strategies evolve technically but often rely on the same core psychological principles to influence behavior over time.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
Lazer, D., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Springer-Verlag.
Pratkanis, A., & Aronson, E. (2001). Age of propaganda: The everyday use and abuse of persuasion. W.H. Freeman.
Zliesch, B. (2020). Data driven influence: The evolution of targeted advertising. Journal of Media Psychology, 12(3), 45-60.
Hindman, M. (2009). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton University Press.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203-218.
Rosen, L. D. (2012). iDisorder: Understanding our obsession with technology and overcoming its hold on us. Palgrave Macmillan.