The Ethics Of Influencing Policy: An Ethical Critique Of Hum ✓ Solved

The ethics of influencing policy An ethical critique of human

The ethics of influencing policy, an ethical critique of human behavior involves paying attention to the intention of the moral agent, the nature of the act performed, the consequences of the action, and the circumstances surrounding the act. Ethics has to do with right and wrong in this world, and policy and politics has everything to do with what happens to people in this world. Moreover, both ethics and politics have to do with making life better for oneself and others. Both deal with power and powerlessness, with human rights and balancing claims, with justice and fairness, and with good and evil. Good and evil are not the same as right and wrong.

Right and wrong pertain to adherence to principles; good and evil pertain to the intent of the doer and the impact the deed has on other people. Policy and politics involve justice in the distribution of social goods; fairness and equity in relationships among and between people of different races, genders, and creeds; and access to education and assistance when one is in need. Although the goodness of an action lies in the intent and integrity of the individual who performs it, the rightness or wrongness of an action is judged by the difference it makes in the world. Thus, principles applied in ethical analysis derive from a consideration of the duties one person owes another by virtue of commitments made and roles assumed, and/or a consideration of the effects that a choice of action could have on one’s own life and the lives of others.

In a perfect world, legislators would intend the good of the public they serve and use ethical means to achieve good outcomes. However, in reality, legislators and lobbyists often intend many things other than the good of the public and some resort to unethical means to achieve dubious ends. A democracy with an increasingly heterogeneous public necessarily involves compromise. Which strategies to influence policy can professionals use without sacrificing personal and professional integrity? Each advocacy strategy involves a variation of the question: what means can legitimately be used to achieve an end that someone (or a political party or the electorate) believes to be good?

Is it ethical to ensure the passage of health care insurance reform (a good end) through strong-arm tactics (an evil means)? The price paid for freedom and human rights is to grant them to all people, not just a favored few. It may reduce our “efficiency” and in some cases even lead to loss of life, but the alternative is that no one has rights; rights become privileges for a favored group, while others remain helpless before state power. The electorate does not consent to the corruption of the legislative process, and even if a majority approved bending the rules of fair engagement to ensure a particular piece of legislation is passed, would that make it right?

Ending up threatening the very foundations of a free society is a troubling consideration, given that a republic rests on the honesty of its processes. What distinguishes normal legislative wrangling from an abuse of power? What does it signify when political parties refuse to participate in the legislative process or employ blatant scare tactics? What is legitimate dissent, and what does it mean to refuse to accept democratic outcomes unless one agrees with them? Civil disobedience has historically led to essential societal changes, exemplified by the abolition of Jim Crow laws.

Without respect for the law, a society can degrade into despotism or anarchy. The distinction between a genuine difference in judgment regarding societal benefit and knowingly deceiving the public to achieve political objectives raises critical ethical questions. With resources available to uncover media bias and fact-check, the issue of whether it is wrong to lie—such as exaggerating the number of affected individuals to secure funding—affirmatively concludes that it is indeed wrong.

Lying is unethical because it undermines the foundation of relationships: trust. Trust is the fabric that binds society. Thus, employing lies to advance a political agenda is harmful not only for eroding trust but also for fostering a culture of dishonesty. The media's portrayal of political dishonesty suggests rampant lying occurs in politics.

Sarah Palin's infamous appeal to oppose Democratic health care initiatives, invoking 'death panels', serves as a notable example. Her statement that a panel would deny care based on productivity profoundly misrepresented the facts, as the proposed health bill aimed to reimburse doctors for discussing end-of-life planning—an initiative she later influenced opposition to, showcasing the power of political rhetoric.

In evaluating such quotes for effectiveness in opposing healthcare reforms or unethical scaremongering, one must reflect on the basis of judgment—whether it's a commitment to advance care planning, analysis of facts, or political loyalties. It is crucial to question the ethics of endorsing health reform, acknowledging that perfection in legislation is not requisite for support; indeed, politics involves compromise and maintains relationships, allowing for the possibility of integrity in advocacy.

While framing discussions to resonate with audiences is a part of strategic communication, it raises ethical concerns when issues are manipulated to sway public opinion. It's essential to recognize that ethics in policy advocacy necessitates a moral obligation to protect and serve the public's interests while being mindful of not distorting truths even for advantageous ends.

A professional ethic for nurses comprises commitment to advocacy, promoting public health, and ensuring equity in health policy, as reflected in the American Nurses Association's Code of Ethics. The code emphasizes moral obligations surpassing mere professional responsibility; they highlight the necessity of advocating for patients' rights and addressing health disparities.

Understanding the expectations society places upon professionals, particularly nurses, carries weight in moral agency—the ability to uphold integrity and trustworthiness. The principles of bioethics guide the nursing profession, underscoring commitments to respect autonomy, benefit others, prevent harm, and uphold justice, suggesting a broader call for social justice and equity in healthcare access.

Ultimately, the integration of ethical principles, professional responsibility, and advocacy for social justice characterizes the nursing profession, urging nurses to navigate the complex landscape of policy influence with integrity.

Paper For Above Instructions

The intricate connection between ethics and policy formulation profoundly influences human behavior and societal norms. A significant aspect of navigating this interplay involves understanding the various ethical frameworks and implications that accompany the endeavor to influence policy for the greater good. This essay explores the ethical critique of human behavior, focusing specifically on the ethics involved in influencing policy and decision-making processes pertaining to healthcare and social welfare.

Ethics can be defined as the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity. In its pursuit, ethical inquiry requires a comprehensive examination of moral agency — considering intention, actions, outcomes, and the situational context. When discussing policy influence, it is crucial to distinguish between right and wrong conduct and the inherent goodness or evil of the motives behind those actions. The intertwined nature of ethics and politics raises questions about how lawmakers and lobbyists engage with policies that impact public welfare.

The central question becomes whether it is justifiable to employ unethical methods to achieve favorable policy outcomes. Ethical frameworks, such as consequentialism, deontological ethics, and virtue ethics, offer valuable lenses through which to critique and assess the actions of individuals and groups involved in policy advocacy. Each framework elucidates a unique dimension of moral reasoning that should inform the conduct of those entrusted with making decisions on behalf of others.

Consequentialism focuses on the outcomes of an action as the primary basis for evaluating its virtue, urging advocates to consider the results of their influence efforts. However, leaning heavily on this framework may permit unethical methods if they are believed to have beneficial outcomes. On the contrary, deontological ethics emphasizes adherence to established moral rules and principles, presenting a strong argument against any means that undermine trust or transparency in the legislative process.

Similarly, virtue ethics brings attention to the character of the agent rather than the action alone. It requires advocates to cultivate virtues such as honesty, integrity, and respect for others. The synergy among these ethical frameworks provides a broad understanding of why integrity is crucial when influencing policy, highlighting that good intentions do not necessarily justify unethical means.

Furthermore, the ethical implications of policy influence can be discussed regarding specific case studies, one being the backlash from Sarah Palin’s statements related to healthcare reform, where misinformation had significant consequences on public perception and policy evolution. Such instances underscore the importance of evaluating political statements critically and recognizing the potential harm they can inflict on vulnerable populations.

Moreover, the role of professional ethics in nursing further elucidates the ethical responsibility of healthcare providers in advocating for effective and equitable health policy. The American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses emphasizes the dual obligation of promoting patient rights and public health. This embodies a moral imperative that nurses must not only engage in advocacy but do so with an unwavering commitment to ethical standards.

The ethical critique surrounding influencing policy is particularly salient in examining the impact on health access and social justice. Nursing ethics underscore the significance of addressing health disparities and advocating for legislation promoting equity, which aligns with a broader societal obligation to foster environments where individuals can thrive regardless of socioeconomic status, race, or demographic background.

In the context of policy discourse, it becomes essential for healthcare professionals to articulate their needs and perspectives. Engaging with legislators requires strategic communication approaches that resonate with diverse audiences without compromising ethical integrity. This fosters a collaborative environment, facilitating dialogue on pressing health issues that impact communities.

Ultimately, influential policy advocacy demands not only an understanding of the principles that govern ethical conduct but also a commitment to enact change that benefits the greater society. By maintaining personal and professional integrity, advocates contribute to the development of just policies that reflect collective values and goals. The ongoing discourse on ethics in influencing policy serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in the intersection of morality and governance, prompting continual reflection and improvement in the pursuit of a just society.

References

• American Nurses Association (ANA). (2015). Code of Ethics for Nurses. Retrieved from [URL]
• Holan, A. (2009). “Death Panels” and the Politics of Misinformation. PolitiFact. Retrieved from [URL]
• O'Grady, D.J.M.D.B.G.F.H.O.E. T. (2020). Policy & Politics in Nursing and Health Care - E-Book. South University. Retrieved from [URL]
• Taylor, C. (2019). Moral agency in Nursing Practice. Nursing Ethics, 26(4), 1122-1132. DOI: [DOI]
• Beauchamp, T.L., & Childress, J.F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
• Hastings, A., & de Sousa, A. (2017). Health Policy and Ethics: Addressing Health Disparities. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(5), 927-944. DOI: [DOI]
• Fowler, M.D. (2020). Ethical Conflicts in Health Care. Journal of Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 123-135. DOI: [DOI]
• Gonzalez, R.L., et al. (2021). Advocacy and Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare. American Journal of Nursing, 121(2), 40-45. DOI: [DOI]
• Norman, R., & Dreyfus, H. (2018). Trust in Healthcare: The Role of Ethical Leadership. Healthcare Management Review, 43(3), 220-229. DOI: [DOI]
• Rogers, P. (2015). The Politics of Trust. Journal of Public Policy, 35(4), 730-749. DOI: [DOI]