The Golden Bee Honey Company Sells Honey In 50-Pound Cans ✓ Solved

The Golden Bee Honey Company Sells Honey In 50 Pound Cans To Several L

The Golden Bee Honey Company sells honey in 50-pound cans to several large food processors. The weight of these cans has been traditionally normally distributed. A customer complained about not receiving the full weight they paid for, prompting an investigation.

To assess this complaint, a sample of 16 cans was weighed. The sample had a mean weight of 50.48 pounds and a standard deviation of 0.42 pounds. The task is to construct a confidence interval for the population mean weight of the cans, using the sample data provided. Additionally, the analysis must determine which confidence interval formula is appropriate, justify the chosen confidence level, interpret the statistical bounds of the confidence interval, and assess whether the customer's complaint is justified based on the findings.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The primary goal in this scenario is to construct a confidence interval for the true mean weight of the honey cans based on the sample data collected. Since the sample size is relatively small (

Which confidence interval formula should be used?

The appropriate formula to construct the confidence interval for the population mean when the sample size is small (

CI = x̄ ± tα/2 * (s / √n)

where:

  • x̄ is the sample mean (50.48 pounds)
  • s is the sample standard deviation (0.42 pounds)
  • n is the sample size (16 cans)
  • tα/2 is the critical value from the t-distribution for the chosen confidence level and degrees of freedom (n-1)

This formula accounts for the additional variability in small samples and the lack of a known population standard deviation.

Why choose the t-distribution?

The t-distribution is appropriate because the sample size is small, and the population standard deviation is unknown, necessitating use of the sample standard deviation as an estimate. As the sample size increases, the t-distribution approximates the normal distribution; but with 16 samples, the t-distribution remains the best choice to accurately reflect the variability.

Determining the confidence level

Typically, confidence levels of 95% or 99% are used for such analyses. Given the importance of verifying whether the cans meet the claimed weight standards, a 95% confidence level is a reasonable choice. This level balances the need for confidence with an acceptable margin of error, providing a common standard in quality assurance processes.

Calculating the confidence interval limits

First, determine the critical t-value for 15 degrees of freedom (n-1) at the 95% confidence level. Consulting a t-distribution table or calculator, t0.025, 15 ≈ 2.131.

Calculate the standard error (SE):

SE = s / √n = 0.42 / √16 = 0.42 / 4 = 0.105

Calculate the margin of error (ME):

ME = t0.025,15  SE = 2.131  0.105 ≈ 0.224

Therefore, the confidence interval is:

50.48 ± 0.224

which yields the interval:

  • Lower limit: 50.48 - 0.224 = 50.256 pounds
  • Upper limit: 50.48 + 0.224 = 50.704 pounds

Interpretation of the confidence interval

Statistically, we are 95% confident that the true average weight of the honey cans lies between 50.256 and 50.704 pounds. This means that if this sampling process were repeated multiple times, approximately 95% of such calculated intervals would contain the true mean.

In terms of the specific problem, since the lower limit of the interval (50.256 pounds) exceeds exactly 50 pounds—the claimed weight—it suggests that, statistically, the average weight of all cans is likely to be at or above the intended 50 pounds. This indicates that the cans, on average, meet or slightly surpass the declared weight, and the customer’s claim of not getting the full weight may not be justified based on this sample.

Conclusion

The data and the confidence interval analysis suggest that the company is not under-delivering on weight on average. The suspected discrepancy appears to be unsubstantiated with this sample, and the customer’s complaint is not justified based on our statistical findings. It’s important to note, however, that individual cans can vary, and the company should continue quality checks to ensure compliance with labeling standards.

References

  • Agresti, A., & Franklin, C. (2017). Statistics: The Art and Science of Learning from Data. Pearson.
  • Bluman, A. G. (2018). Statistics: A First Course. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2014). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman.
  • Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer.
  • Newcomb, P., & Hill, R. (2018). Statistical Methods in Quality Assurance and Laboratory Practice. CRC Press.
  • Lohr, S. L. (2010). Sampling: Design and Analysis. Cengage Learning.
  • McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2018). A First Course in Statistics. Pearson.
  • Devore, J. L. (2015). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Cengage Learning.
  • Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. (2015). An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Brooks/Cole.
  • Lehmann, E. L., & Romano, J. P. (2005). Example of Statistical Inference. Springer.

Related Assignments