The Hate U Give: Make Sure Your Verb Tenses Agree ✓ Solved

The Hate U Giveglobal Make Sure Your Verb Tenses Agree You Switch Be

The assignment requires an analysis and revision of a provided text with specific attention to ensuring verb tense consistency, clarity, and coherence. The content discusses the film adaptation of Angie Thomas's novel "The Hate U Give," highlighting themes of racial injustice, institutionalized racism, and individual activism through the character Starr Carter. The task involves revising sections marked with question marks and highlights, maintaining the required word count, and producing an academic paper approximately 1000 words long with credible references. The paper should include an introduction, main body, and conclusion, demonstrating a clear understanding of racial issues portrayed in the film and novel, and offering critical insights into systemic inequalities and possible solutions.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The film "The Hate U Give" is a compelling adaptation of Angie Thomas's 2017 young adult novel that addresses critical issues of racial injustice and systemic discrimination in contemporary America. The narrative centers on Starr Carter, a 16-year-old Black girl navigating life between her impoverished neighborhood, Garden Heights, and her predominantly white, affluent school, Williamson Academy. Through her experiences, the story explores themes of racial identity, police brutality, and social inequality, sparking important conversations about race relations in modern society.

Initially, Starr's battles begin when she witnesses the fatal shooting of her childhood friend Khalil by a police officer. Witnessing this traumatic event, she struggles with the decision to speak out or remain silent, fearing the repercussions from both communities. As she stands publicly to condemn Khalil’s death, she faces social tensions and personal threats, illustrating the profound impact of institutionalized racism. The film reveals how racial biases embedded within law enforcement, educational systems, and housing policies perpetuate disparities. One recurring theme is the segregation of neighborhoods, where white and Black populations live separately, reinforcing socioeconomic divides that influence opportunities and access to justice.

Starr's concealment of her lifestyle from her white friends, including her boyfriend Chris, underscores the societal pressures to hide one's racial identity to avoid discrimination. She fears that revealing her background might change their perception of her or cause rejection. Similarly, Starr keeps her relationship with Chris secret from her father, Maverick, out of fear that his disapproval would be rooted in cultural differences and race-based prejudices. Despite these fears, Chris's growing awareness of racial injustices deepens his understanding of Starr's experiences, and he supports her efforts for justice. His character exemplifies the potential for empathy and allyship across racial boundaries, emphasizing that meaningful change requires understanding and solidarity.

The systemic racism depicted extends beyond personal prejudices to institutional practices. For example, the justice system's response to Khalil's murder — with the jury acquitting the officer — exemplifies the systemic failure to hold law enforcement accountable for racially motivated violence. Educational institutions also contribute to systemic inequities by attempting to socialize Black students into accepting their marginalized status, prompting Starr to adapt her behavior to fit in with her white peers. These issues demonstrate the entrenched nature of racial bias and the responsibility of individuals, particularly those in privileged positions, to challenge and dismantle such systems.

As a member of the white majority with greater societal privileges, Chris eventually recognizes the importance of actively supporting racial justice. Although initially supportive of law enforcement, he learns to listen and understand Starr's perspective, embodying the role of an ally. This evolution underscores the moral obligation of individuals with privilege to advocate for fairness and equality. White people, due to their societal advantage, bear a particular responsibility to challenge racist structures and promote justice, aligning with the principles that moral authority entails moral responsibility.

Furthermore, addressing systemic racism requires legal reforms that promote equal rights and dismantle discriminatory practices. Ensuring justice involves not only changing policies but also transforming societal attitudes that perpetuate racial stereotypes. Promoting educational programs that foster cultural awareness and empathy can mitigate biases, while policy reforms in housing, policing, and employment are essential for creating equitable opportunities. White privilege should be recognized as a moral responsibility to act against injustice, rather than an entitlement that sustains inequality.

Throughout the narrative, Starr exemplifies moral courage by speaking out against injustice, despite the risks involved. Her outcry against the systemic failures reveals her awareness of the deep-rooted nature of racial discrimination and her commitment to advocating for change. Her activism, though personal and emotional, effectively challenges the injustices faced by her community, inspiring others to question and confront societal inequities. Khalil's tragic death becomes a catalyst for her determination to seek justice and equality, illustrating the power of individual action in combating systemic oppression.

In conclusion, "The Hate U Give" highlights essential societal responsibilities that transcend racial differences. It emphasizes that individuals, regardless of race, must recognize and act against injustices, fostering a culture of fairness and respect. The film demonstrates that systemic inequalities are perpetuated through institutional practices and societal attitudes, requiring collective and individual efforts to dismantle. White privilege entails not only inherent advantages but also a moral obligation to support racial equity and challenge discrimination at every level. By promoting awareness, advocating for policy change, and embodying moral responsibility, society can move toward greater justice and harmony.

References

• Angie Thomas. (2017). The Hate U Give. Balzer + Bray.
• Bonilla-Silva, E. (2014). Racism without racists: Colour-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299.
• DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. Beacon Press.
• Frederickson, G. H. (2002). Racism: A short history. Princeton University Press.
• Kendi, I. X. (2019). How to be an antiracist. One World.
• Miller, J. (2018). Systemic racism in America: An overview. Journal of Social Justice, 10(2), 45-62.
• Wolters, R. (2019). White privilege and racial inequality. Routledge.
• Yarbrough, D. (2018). Exploring racial disparities in the criminal justice system. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(3), 223-237.
• SMU Libraries Digital. (2020). The Hate U Give [Video file]. Vimeo.