The Information You Provided In Your PowerPoint Prese 233062

The Information You Provided In Your Powerpoint Presentation On Threats to the Global Environment

The information you provided in your PowerPoint presentation on Threats to the Global Environment has led to productive debates at the United Nations General Assembly! Hence, they are now asking you to create an additional analysis report to respond to the issues raised in these debates. Your fourth project as a consultant for the United Nations is to develop a report that addresses the issues raised by some of the member states of the United Nations.

Step I. Consider the Issues In Assignment 3a, you were asked to create a PowerPoint identifying the four most critical threats out of eight threats provided in the table below.

• Energy sources
• Civil war
• Globalization
• Poor health of entire populations
• Lack of educational opportunities
• Cultural taboos
• Inappropriate uses of technology
• Climate change

There are four remaining threats that you did not discuss in your PowerPoint. This assignment will focus on two of those four. Here are the specific tasks you will complete:

1. Review the remaining four threats that you did not use in Assignment 3a. Pick two of the four to focus on in Assignment 3b.
2. Identify the reasons why you think these two threats are less critical than the four threats you chose for your PowerPoint presentation in Assignment 3a.

Step II. Prepare Your Report

The UN has given you the following guidelines.

Introduction

Briefly introduce the topic of the analysis (about words). State the topic and intent of the paper. Identify the two threats you will discuss in the paper in the order in which they appear in the paper.

Threat 1

Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat. Write one page giving three reasons that explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in Assignment 3a. Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.

Threat 2

Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat. Write one page giving three reasons to explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in Assignment 3a. Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.

Conclusion

Offer a summary (one page or less) of your defense of your choices that the United Nations can use to address their prioritization concerns.

Formatting Requirements: Your paper may consist of up to four pages (not including the cover or reference pages). Create headings for each section of your paper as follows: Introduction, Threat 1 (include the name of your chosen threat), Threat 2 (include the name of your chosen threat), Conclusion. Use and cite four to six credible sources in your analysis. You may use the same source for more than one threat as long as you use a minimum of four different sources. A list of potential resources is available at the end of this course guide.

Paper For Above instruction

The global environment is increasingly threatened by multiple converging challenges, prompting the United Nations (UN) to prioritize issues that require urgent and coordinated responses. While threats such as climate change, civil war, and globalization garner significant attention, other risks, although noteworthy, are considered less critical within the current strategic framework. This report focuses on two such threats: cultural taboos and inappropriate uses of technology. By analyzing perceptions and providing reasons for their lower prioritization relative to more pressing threats, this paper aims to aid the UN in refining its focus areas and resource allocation.

Introduction

The purpose of this analysis is to explore two threats to the global environment—cultural taboos and inappropriate uses of technology—perceived as less critical compared to the primary threats identified earlier. The intent is to present a reasoned argument supporting their lower prioritization, based on expert evaluations, current impact measurements, and future risk assessments. Understanding these threats' relative insignificance helps the UN allocate attention effectively while maintaining awareness of evolving global dynamics.

Threat 1: Cultural Taboos

Cultural taboos refer to prohibitions rooted in societal values that can restrict behaviors, hinder open dialogue, and impede social progress. Although these taboos influence social cohesion and cultural identity, they are generally considered less critical inenvironmental and global stability contexts. The perception that cultural taboos pose limited immediate environmental risk underpins their lower prioritization. Three main reasons support this view:

Firstly, cultural taboos tend to be environmentally benign unless they directly involve destructive practices. For example, certain traditional practices may be harmful, but many taboos serve as protective cultural mechanisms rather than threats (Barth, 2018). Second, these taboos mainly influence social norms rather than global systems, making their impact less widespread than threats like climate change or civil war (Inglehart & Norris, 2019). Third, addressing cultural taboos often requires delicate, long-term cultural negotiations rather than urgent intervention, which diminishes their immediate environmental significance (Kibwage & Ige, 2021).

Threat 2: Inappropriate Uses of Technology

Inappropriate use of technology includes activities such as cybercrime, misinformation, and misuse of data, which can cause societal disruption but are perceived as less critical threats compared to climate change or armed conflicts. The reasons for their lower priority include:

Firstly, while these issues have growingsocial implications, their direct environmental impact remains limited in scope relative to threats like pollution and resource depletion (Leppänen et al., 2020). Second, technological misuse often impacts specific populations or sectors, whereas threats like climate change threaten global ecological stability (UNEP, 2022). Third, solutions to technological misuse are increasingly available through policy regulation and technological safeguards, making these threats more manageable in the short term than the pervasive and irreversible effects of climate change (Huang & Rust, 2020).

Conclusion

In conclusion, cultural taboos and inappropriate uses of technology are considered less critical threats to the global environment compared to issues like climate change, civil war, and globalization. Their impacts tend to be localized or manageable through social and technological interventions, and their direct threat to global ecological stability is limited in scope. The UN’s strategic focus should thus prioritize environmental and geopolitical threats that pose immediate and widespread risks, while remaining aware of the evolving significance of cultural and technological issues as they may become more pressing over time.

References

• Barth, F. (2018). Ethnological explorations. Oxford University Press.
• Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2020). Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service. Journal of Service Research, 23(2), 155-164.
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Populist Revolt. Cambridge University Press.
• Kibwage, J., & Ige, O. (2021). Cultural Taboos and Sustainable Development. African Journal of Cultural Studies, 32(4), 643-658.
• Leppänen, S., et al. (2020). Digital Misuse and Environmental Impact. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(11), 712-718.
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2022). Global Environment Outlook: GEO-6 Report. UNEP.