The Movie We Chose Is Notesbook. You May Choose Any Relevant
The Movie We Chose Is Notesbookyou May Choose Any Relevant Movies O
The movie we chose is notesbook. You may choose any relevant movie(s) or television show that illustrates the main topics from three different chapters. You are required to analyze the movie or TV show using theories and knowledge from the course readings. Your analysis should involve the following: a. Analyze the movie/show using theories (Be specific. Don’t just say motivation. Or use the definition of motivation. What theories are you referring to?) b. Explain the interrelationships among the three main topics you have selected (for in the movie or show of your choice).
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
The film "The Notebook," directed by Nick Cassavetes and based on Nicholas Sparks' novel, serves as a compelling narrative of love, memory, and social class. This essay analyzes the movie through the lens of psychological motivation, interpersonal relationships, and social influence theories. By exploring these interconnected themes, the paper demonstrates how the characters' motivations influence their relationships and societal perceptions, illustrating core concepts from the course readings.
Analysis Using Theories
The movie vividly showcases Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs as it portrays Noah and Allie's pursuit of love and belonging. Noah's actions, such as rebuilding the house, can be interpreted through Self-Determination Theory as intrinsic motivation driven by a need for autonomy and competence. Allie's internal conflict reflects Shift from External to Internal Motivation, where external societal expectations initially influence her actions, but her love for Noah signifies internalized motivation.
Furthermore, Attachment Theory is evident in the characters’ relationship dynamics. Noah exhibits a secure attachment style, characterized by loyalty and trust, while Allie's fluctuating feelings reveal anxious attachment tendencies, contributed by external pressures like her engagement to another man. These attachment styles underpin their emotional responses and reconciliation, aligning with Bowlby’s theoretical framework.
In addition, Social Influence Theories such as Conformity and Social Norms are reflected in the societal expectations that impact Allie’s decisions. Her family’s disapproval of Noah, rooted in class distinctions, demonstrates normative social influence, while Noah's persistence illustrates the influence of Personal Conviction and Resilience.
Interrelationship among Main Topics
The interplay among motivation, relationships, and social influence is central to understanding the narrative. Noah's intrinsic motivation rooted in love propels his efforts to be with Allie, aligning with the influence of personal convictions against societal norms. Allie’s internal conflict, driven by social and familial pressures, demonstrates how social influence affects personal motivation and behavior.
Moreover, their attachment styles influence how social influences are internalized. Noah’s secure attachment helps him withstand social rejection, reinforcing his motivation to maintain their relationship. Conversely, Allie’s anxious attachment makes her susceptible to external pressures, leading to internal conflict between societal expectations and personal desires. This interconnected dynamic underscores how motivation and social influence shape relationship trajectories, emphasizing the importance of understanding these theories in analyzing human behavior in social contexts.
Conclusion
"The Notebook" exemplifies the complex interplay of motivation, interpersonal relationships, and social influence. Through applying theories such as Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Attachment Theory, and Social Influence models, it becomes evident that individual motivations are shaped by relational bonds and societal pressures. Recognizing these interrelations enriches our understanding of human behavior, especially in the context of enduring love amidst societal constraints. This analysis highlights the significance of theoretical frameworks in comprehending the nuanced facets of romantic relationships portrayed in popular media.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
Snyder, M., & Cantor, N. (1976). Social comparison of personal prototype: A test of a self-evaluation maintenance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 685–697.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. Basic Books.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1956). An overview of social psychology. Harper.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.