The Outcomes Of Neural Stem Cell Transplantation And Localiz

The Outcomes of Neural Stem Cell Transplantation and Localized Drug T

Briefly introduce your research topic. While this may seem redundant at each section, it is important to remind the reader at the beginning of each section. The following section will discuss the limitations, use and applications of findings, and recommendations of the research. This section requires one paragraph in length.

Discuss the limitations of your study. Do not leave this paragraph empty; there are always limitations (e.g. time, funding, scope, etc.). This section requires one paragraph in length.

Summarize your findings from your research. (For example: The use and application of these findings may contribute to…by….). This section requires one paragraph in length. There should be at least 3 recommendations (each a separate paragraph).

Recommendation 1: Thinking outside the box, think of what recommendations you can make to improve the problem you have identified previously. Elaborate why your recommendation is appropriate. This section requires one paragraph in length.

Recommendation 2: Thinking outside the box, think of what recommendations you can make to improve the problem you have identified previously. Elaborate why your recommendation is appropriate. This section requires one paragraph in length.

Recommendation 3: Thinking outside the box, think of what recommendations you can make to improve the problem you have identified previously. Elaborate why your recommendation is appropriate. This section requires one paragraph in length.

Summarize your research study/topic here. Your conclusion may end up being a few paragraph in length.

References

• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Traumatic Brain Injury. Retrieved April 6, 2016, from https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/get_the_facts.html
• Williams, A. J., et al. (2005). Pathophysiological consequences of penetrating ballistic brain injury in a rat model. Journal of Neurotrauma, 22(4), 523-531.
• Bramlett, H., et al. (2015). Penetrating ballistic brain injury reduces focal and global brain glucose utilization: A C-2DG autoradiography study in a rat model. Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
• Bramlett, H., et al. (2015). Neuroregeneration effects in rat models of penetrating brain injury. Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
• Bullock, R., Dietrich, W. D., & Gajavelli, S. (2016). Optimal engraftment of human neural stem cells via surgical intervention or localized therapy injection. Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.
• National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. (2016). Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury. Retrieved from https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/health-topics/traumatic-brain-injury
• Hellen Bramlett, et al. (2015). Effects of regenerative therapy on neurobehavioral outcomes in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 33(2), 215–226.
• John, J., & Smith, A. (2014). Advances in neural stem cell therapies for brain injuries. Neuroscience Advances, 7(3), 123-134.
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Traumatic Brain Injury Fact Sheet. https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/TBI_Fact_Sheet-a.pdf
• Williams, A. J., et al. (2005). Pathophysiological consequences of penetrating ballistic brain injury in a rat model. Journal of Neurotrauma, 22(4), 523-531.