The Plan Recognition Problem: An Intersection Of Psychology

The Plan Recognition Problem An Intersection Of Psychology And Artifi

The plan recognition problem: An intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence Schmidt, C. F., Sridharan, N. S., & Goodson, J. L. (1978). The plan recognition problem: An intersection of psychology and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 11(1), 45-83. · C.F. Schmidt, · N.S. Sridharan, · J.L. Goodson · Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A. Available online 16 June 2003 Abstract Understanding actions involves inferring the goal of the actor and organizing the actions into a plan structure. The BELIEVER system is a psychological theory of how human observers understand the actions of others. The present theory is concerned with single-actor sequences and can account for goal-directed actions that may succeed or fail in accomplishing the goal, as well as actions governed by norms. After discussing how AI can be applied in psychological theory construction, the BELIEVER system is presented by specifying a plan recognition process and its knowledge sources. Artificial Intelligence Volume 11, Issues 1–2, August 1978, Pages 45–83 Applications to the Sciences and Medicine Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence 1. Steve Woolgar 2. Woolgar, S. (1985). Why not a Sociology of Machines? The Case of Sociology and Artificial Intelligence. Sociology Sociology, 19. doi:10.1177/ Abstract In the light of the recent growth of artificial intelligence (AI), and of its implications for understanding human behaviour, this paper evaluates the prospects for an association between sociology and artificial intelligence. Current presumptions about the distinction between human behaviour and artificial intelligence are identified through a survey of discussions about AI and 'expert systems'. These discussions exhibit a restricted view of sociological competence, a marked rhetoric of progress and a wide variation in assessments of the state of the art. By drawing upon recent themes in the social study of science, these discussions are shown to depend on certain key dichotomies and on an interpretive flexibility associated with the notions of intelligence and expertise. The range of possible associations between sociology and AI reflects the extent to which we are willing to adopt these features of AI discourse. It is suggested that one of the more important options is to view the AI phenomenon as an occasion for reassessing the central axiom of sociology that there is something distinctively 'social' about human behaviour. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. KATHLEEN M. CARLEY 1. Carnegie Mellon University Abstract The potential linkages between artificial intelligence and sociology are growing. This growth is due to importation of artificial intelligence techniques into methodological tools for data analysis, a growing interest among researchers in artificial intelligence in the socially situated agent, and a growing interest among sociologists in using artificial intelligence techniques for theorizing about social phenomena. Increasingly, researchers are addressing concerns of traditional importance within sociology, such as the bases for cooperation, the role of structure in affecting individual agency, and interaction using computational models of intelligent adaptive agents. This article provides an overview of the role that artificial intelligence currently plays within sociology. Carley, K. (1996). Artificial Intelligence within Sociology. Sociological Methods & Research, 25(1), 3-30. doi:doi: 10.1177/ Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems September 2001, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp Naming the Unnamable: Socionics or the Sociological Turn of/to Distributed Artificial Intelligence · Thomas Malsch %0 Journal Article %D 2001 %@ %J Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems %V 4 %N 3 %R 10.1023/A: %T Naming the Unnamable: Socionics or the Sociological Turn of/to Distributed Artificial Intelligence %U %I Kluwer Academic Publishers % %A Malsch, Thomas %P %G EnglishBottom of Form HS115 | Software Applications for Health Care Professionals 1 Assignment Instructions Unit 8 Assignment, Part 2 of 2: Email Guidelines Unit outcome(s) addressed in this Assignment: • Discuss the concepts of privacy, confidentiality, security, and integrity as they apply to the management of electronic data. • Recognize common threats to privacy, confidentiality, security, and integrity of data stored in electronic systems. • Apply effective procedures for protecting data, software, and hardware. Course outcome(s) addressed in this Assignment: HS115-4: Manage data and documents by integrating appropriate programs. HS115-5: Demonstrate how these programs are used by healthcare professionals and in a healthcare environment. Instructions: Scenario: You have been approached by your children’s school to help the school nurse create a set of e-mail guidelines for the teachers and students. Please create a minimum 200-word paper, listing and describing completely at least 5 guidelines that you have created. As your write your paper, please consider the following: • A definition of intranet is a network that is part of an organization. In this case, the intranet would include the e-mail accounts assigned to the teachers and students by the school. For example, using your Kaplan student e-mail to send e-mails to instructors or non-Kaplan e-mail addresses. • For this discussion, internet identifies systems outside of the school’s control, including e-mail accounts not provided by the school. For example, any personal e-mail account that a person uses to send electronic mail messages. • As a parent, do you feel comfortable with students and teachers sending e-mails via their personal accounts, or do you feel that the school provided e-mail accounts are the best account to use to communicate about school information? o What about the school nurse, using a personal e-mail to discuss children’s health related issues? o What steps can the school take, if any, to ensure the information shared in private e-mail accounts stays secure? o What about professionalism? Can a person, be professional when using a personal e-mail account? HS115 | Software Applications for Health Care Professionals 2 When complete, please submit your work file(s) to the Dropbox. Be sure to Upload ALL of your Assignment. Use the proper naming convention: Unit 8-Assign-Student Last Name (username is your Kaplan username, XX is your course section number). To view your graded work, come back to the Dropbox or go to the Gradebook after your instructor has evaluated it. Make sure that you save a copy of your submitted project. Your work is due by the end of Unit 8. Unit 8 Assignment 2 of 2 Requirements Points possible Points earned by student Lists at least 5 e-mail guidelines for teachers and students to follow. Each guideline, 2 points each. 10 For each guideline, includes text explaining the outline. 3 pts per guideline. 15 Total (Sum of all points) 25 Points deducted for spelling, grammar, and/or APA errors. (See Writing Deductions Rubric in Doc Sharing) Adjusted total points Instructor Feedback: