The Purpose Of This Literature Review Is To Describe Summary

The Purpose Of This Literature Review Is To Describe Summarize And E

The purpose of this literature review is to describe, summarize, and evaluate existing research on your chosen topic in a comprehensive and concise way. Your topic discussion should start broad and become more focused as you develop the review. The literature review needs to cover many aspects relating to the topic.

Paper For Above instruction

The literature review is a critical academic exercise that involves systematically describing, summarizing, and evaluating existing research literature pertaining to a specific topic. The primary aim is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the topic by integrating findings from multiple studies, thereby identifying gaps, trends, and areas for further research. This process begins with a broad overview of the field and gradually narrows down to specific issues, which aligns with the 'upside-down pyramid' approach. The goal is to clearly demonstrate the significance of the selected topic and the rationale for exploring it in greater detail.

Structurally, this review must conform to the APA 6th edition formatting guidelines, ensuring consistency, academic rigor, and proper citation practices. The paper should include a separate title page in APA format and an optional abstract that succinctly summarizes the scope and key findings of the review. The core aim is to synthesize diverse sources—specifically, at least four—that include three research articles (either experimental or correlational studies) and one additional type of article such as a review article, a section of the DSM, or other scholarly literature.

In conducting this literature review, it is essential to leverage existing resources effectively. An attached pre-filled data organizer provides references to articles and relevant studies, enabling efficient review and interpretation. It is expected that the student thoroughly reads and critically analyses these sources to produce a nuanced discussion. Depth of understanding, clarity of synthesis, and critical evaluation are key components necessary for a high-quality paper that aims for an A or B grade.

Furthermore, the process involves evaluating methodologies, findings, and conclusions across different studies, and integrating these insights into a cohesive narrative. The review should highlight how the studies relate to each other, identifying consistencies or discrepancies in findings, and discussing the implications for theory and practice. The writing must be clear, well-organized, and free of grammatical errors, with appropriate academic tone and citations.

Given the importance of this assignment, the instructor emphasizes the need for genuine interest and engagement with the topic. Communication is encouraged—students should message or chat if they have questions or require clarification. This interaction ensures that the resulting paper aligns with the assignment’s expectations and rubric, maximizing the chance of achieving the desired academic grade. Additional details and resources may be provided as bids are submitted, emphasizing the need for a collaborative approach to completing this task effectively.

References

• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). APA.
• Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence based medicine (5th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
• Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage Publications.
• Cochrane Collaboration. (2020). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.1.
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination. Sage.
• Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Pope, C., & Mays, N. (2016). Qualitative research in health care. John Wiley & Sons.