The Quiz Is Worth 50 Points; There Are 10 Problems.

The Quiz Is Worth 50 Pointsthere Are 10 Problems Each

Instructions: • The quiz is worth 50 points. There are 10 problems , each worth 5 points. Your score on the quiz will be converted to a percentage and posted in your assignment folder with comments. • This quiz allows open book and open notes, and you may take as long as you like on it provided that you submit the quiz no later than the due date posted in our course schedule of the syllabus. You may refer to your textbook, notes, and online classroom materials, but you may not consult anyone. • You should show all of your work to receive full credit. If you do not show work, you may earn only partial or no credit. • Please type your work in your copy of the quiz, or if you prefer, create a document containing your work. Scanned work is also acceptable. Be sure to include your name in the document. Review instructions for submitting your quiz in the Quizzes Module.

Paper For Above instruction

The purpose of this quiz is to assess students' understanding of the course material through problem-solving exercises that require application of concepts learned. Given that the quiz is open book and open notes, students have the opportunity to reference their materials thoroughly, which fosters deep understanding and correct application rather than rote memorization. This format emphasizes the importance of methodological clarity, showing all work to demonstrate reasoning and problem-solving processes.

Allowing students to take as long as they like, provided they submit before the deadline, encourages thoroughness and reduces test anxiety, thus enabling students to produce their best work. The calculator or scratch work can be used during the process, but final answers should be clearly marked and supported by the worked-out solutions. This approach aligns with principles of formative assessment, where the process and reasoning are as important as the final answer. It also emphasizes academic honesty, as students are advised not to consult anyone else during the quiz.

Structurally, the quiz comprises 10 problems worth equal points, encouraging students to allocate appropriate time to each problem based on difficulty, and ensuring balanced assessment of different aspects of the course content. The total score will be converted into a percentage, contributing proportionally to the overall course grade. Feedback provided post-submission will assist students in identifying areas of strength and weakness for future improvement.

In conclusion, this open-book, open-notes quiz strategy promotes critical thinking, resourcefulness, and integrity, which are essential skills in academic and professional settings. Instruction clarity, structured problem-solving, and timely submission are critical elements that support effective learning. Students are encouraged to use every available resource within the allowed parameters to achieve an accurate and comprehensive demonstration of their mastery of the material.

References

• Brown, P., & Knight, P. (2018). Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education. Routledge.
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
• Race, P. (2014). Making Learning Happen: A Guide for Post-Compulsory Educators. Sage Publications.
• Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and their academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–41.
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
• McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 86(1), 40-49.
• Taras, M. (2001). The use of assessment for promoting student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 319–329.
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.