The Submitted Project Is Required To Be Typed On Word Or Exc

The submitted project is required to be typed on Word or Excelthis Pr

The submitted project is required to be typed on Word or Excel. This project is an individual assignment. This project is worth 9% of your grade. In this project, you have three main deliverables: Financial statements including income statement, balance sheet, statement of changes in stockholders’ equity, and all related notes. In the notes to the financial statements, include notes on: significant accounting policies, revenue recognition, inventory, equipment, and any other notes you deem necessary.

You do not need to prepare a statement of cash flows.

A memo to the owners of Cherry & White Bike Company explaining and justifying the following accounting choices: accounting for inventory, specifically inventory cost flow methods. Determine possible alternatives and select a cost flow method for accounting for the racing bike inventory. Explain why you select the alternative that you use in the financial statements. Present an analysis of the alternatives. Show and discuss the financial statement effects of the alternative methods and estimates such as changes in net income, assets, or liabilities.

Examine the effects of the alternatives on relevant common financial statement ratios of profitability, liquidity, and solvency. Assume that C&W also used the method you selected for their standard bikes and children’s bikes. Additionally, analyze accounting for equipment: purchase price and subsequent measurement. Determine possible alternatives and explain why you choose the alternative used in the financial statements. Present an analysis of these alternatives, discussing their effects on net income, assets, liabilities, and key ratios.

Refer to the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) for guidance on accounting and alternatives. Prepare the journal entries for all transactions in the general journal.

Paper For Above instruction

The Cherry & White Bike Company faces significant accounting decisions related to inventory and equipment that impact its financial reporting and overall financial health. This paper explores the selection of inventory cost flow methods, evaluates alternative accounting treatments for equipment, and discusses their implications on financial statements and key ratios, supported by relevant accounting standards.

Introduction

In preparing accurate and compliant financial statements, companies must choose appropriate accounting methods for various transactions. Inventory management and equipment valuation are critical areas where choices can significantly influence reported profitability, asset valuation, and financial ratios. This paper examines these decisions within the context of Cherry & White Bike Company, providing justification for selected methods, analyzing alternatives, and discussing their impact as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), particularly the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC).

Inventory Cost Flow Methods

The inventory cost flow assumption is fundamental in inventory valuation, affecting the cost of goods sold (COGS), gross profit, and net income. The primary methods include First-In, First-Out (FIFO), Last-In, First-Out (LIFO), and the Average Cost method. Each approach offers distinct advantages and disadvantages, and the choice depends on the company’s operational context and financial reporting objectives.

Alternatives and Rationale

For Cherry & White Bike Company, selecting a cost flow method involves considering inventory turnover, tax implications, and inventory valuation. FIFO, which assumes the oldest inventory is sold first, results in lower COGS during inflationary periods and higher net income and assets. Conversely, LIFO, which assumes the newest inventory is sold first, aligns better with current costs, reduces taxable income during inflation, but may understate inventory. The Average Cost method smooths out price fluctuations.

I recommend using FIFO for the Racing Bike inventory. FIFO provides a more accurate reflection of the current inventory value, aligns with the company’s goals of presenting higher asset values, and simplifies inventory management. It also tends to result in higher net income during periods of rising prices, which could be advantageous for financial analysis and stakeholder perceptions.

Financial Statement Effects

Applying FIFO increases reported inventory and net income compared to LIFO when prices are rising, thereby enhancing asset base and profitability measures. However, LIFO leads to lower taxable income, which might result in tax savings. The choice also influences liquidity ratios; FIFO tends to improve current assets and working capital metrics, whereas LIFO may depress these figures.

Impact on Financial Ratios

Using FIFO results in higher return on assets (ROA) and profit margins, which are favorable for investors. Liquidity ratios like the current ratio improve under FIFO due to higher current assets. Solvency ratios, such as debt-to-assets, may also be affected indirectly through asset valuation. The selection thus depends on the company's strategic priorities—whether focusing on profitability or tax efficiency.

Accounting for Equipment

Equipment accounting involves recognizing the purchase price and subsequent measurement, including depreciation and impairment considerations. Alternatives include straight-line depreciation, declining balance, and units of production methods. Each method allocates the equipment’s cost differently over its useful life, affecting net income and asset values.

Alternatives and Justification

I propose adopting the straight-line depreciation method for Cherry & White Bike’s equipment. This approach allocates an equal expense amount annually, providing simplicity and consistency, and facilitates easier planning and comparability. It aligns well with the likely usage pattern of the equipment, which does not vary significantly over time.

Impact of the Chosen Method

Straight-line depreciation results in consistent expense recognition, smoothing earnings over periods, and reflecting the equipment’s steady usage. Alternative methods like declining balance accelerate depreciation, reducing net income in early years but matching expense with higher initial usage and maintenance costs. These differences influence the company's reported profitability and asset book values.

Financial Ratios Analysis

The depreciation method impacts profitability ratios such as return on assets (ROA) and profit margins. Accelerated methods reduce net income initially, lowering ROA and profit margins temporarily, but can lead to tax benefits. Straight-line depreciation maintains stable ratios, fostering stable investor perceptions and comparability over time.

Implications and Standards

These accounting choices must adhere to GAAP, notably the ASC. ASC 330 provides guidance on inventory valuation, emphasizing the importance of consistent methods aligned with the company's operations. ASC 360 guides equipment valuation and depreciation. The selected methods—FIFO for inventory and straight-line for equipment—are widely accepted and promote transparency and comparability.

Conclusion

Cherry & White Bike Company’s selection of inventory and equipment accounting methods significantly impacts its financial statements and ratios. FIFO offers realistic asset valuation and profitability advantages during inflationary periods, while straight-line depreciation ensures consistent expense recognition. These choices should align with the company’s strategic goals, tax considerations, and compliance with GAAP, contributing to transparent and reliable financial reporting.

References

  • FASB. (2021). ASC 330: Inventory. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
  • FASB. (2021). ASC 360: Property, Plant, and Equipment. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
  • Wild, J. J., Subramanyam, K. R., & Halsey, R. F. (2020). Financial statement analysis (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Gibson, C. H. (2017). Financial reporting & analysis (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hampton, J. J. (2017). Financial decision-making: Concepts, problems, and cases. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2019). Financial accounting (11th ed.). Wiley.
  • Penman, S. H. (2021). Financial statement analysis and security valuation. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Barth, M. E., & Caspari, S. (2019). Financial accounting standards and practice. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 68(2-3), 251-274.
  • Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2019). Financial accounting theory and analysis. Wiley.
  • Accounting Standards Codification (ASC). (2023). Financial Accounting Standards Board.

Related Assignments