There Are 3 Assignments Below, Each Must Be In Its Own Doc F

There Are 3 Assignments Below Each Most Be In Its On Doc Fileassign

There are three assignments provided. Each assignment must be completed and saved as a separate document file. The assignments are as follows:

Assignment 1

Create at least four PowerPoint slides using GE company. List the quality tools your organization uses. Explain why these tools are used. Using the identified tools, relate them to the supply chain components of GE and demonstrate why each of these tools is necessary.

Assignment 2

Conduct a poll of at least five people by asking specific questions about happiness and life satisfaction. Evaluate each answer to determine whether it is hedonic or eudaimonic, and record this classification in a table. Answer the following question in writing: "What makes you happy?" Additionally, consider whether the respondents believe they are living “the good life” and why, as well as what changes they would make for greater happiness. Write a summary of your findings, highlighting common beliefs about happiness that emerged from the responses.

Assignment 3

Read the scenario involving William, a 44-year-old project manager, and answer the questions based on the perspectives of traditional psychology and positive psychology. Your responses should be at least 200 words each, supported by details from the assigned video and reading, with proper APA citations and references. Discuss William’s situation from the disease model perspective, focusing on relevant information, conclusions, and recommendations. Then, analyze his circumstances through positive psychology, highlighting important factors and possible interventions.

Paper For Above instruction

Assignment 1: Quality Tools in GE's Supply Chain

In today's competitive manufacturing and service industries, the implementation of quality management tools is essential for maintaining efficiency, reducing waste, and ensuring customer satisfaction. General Electric (GE), a multinational conglomerate with diverse business units including aviation, healthcare, energy, and manufacturing, leverages a variety of quality tools within its supply chain to optimize processes and uphold high standards of quality (Liker, 2004).

Among the most widely used quality tools at GE are Six Sigma, Statistical Process Control (SPC), Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Root Cause Analysis (RCA). Six Sigma, pioneered by GE under the leadership of Jack Welch, aims to reduce process variation and eliminate defects by applying statistical methods to process improvement (Pande, Neuman, & Cavanagh, 2000). This tool is critical in GE's supply chain for ensuring production consistency, minimizing errors, and enhancing customer satisfaction.

Statistical Process Control involves monitoring process behavior through control charts to detect deviations from acceptable limits, thereby preventing defective products from reaching customers (Montgomery, 2012). GE employs SPC to monitor key manufacturing processes, allowing immediate corrective actions. FMEA is used to systematically evaluate potential failure modes in processes or products, prioritizing risks based on severity, occurrence, and detection (Stamatis, 2003). This analysis helps GE preemptively address problems in complex supply chain stages.

Root Cause Analysis focuses on identifying the underlying causes of defects or failures, facilitating targeted corrective measures (Sohal & Pervan, 2005). At GE, RCA is integrated into quality management to continuously improve processes, reduce defects, and optimize supply chain operations. These tools are interconnected and contribute to a culture of continuous improvement, bringing measurable benefits such as reduced costs, enhanced product quality, and improved delivery times (Liker, 2004).

The use of these quality tools within GE's supply chain demonstrates a strategic approach to quality management, aligning with its overarching goal of delivering high-quality products and services. Integrating Six Sigma and other tools ensures process robustness, minimizes waste, and supports innovation. Such systematic and data-driven practices are vital in competitive markets, helping GE sustain its reputation and operational excellence.

Assignment 2: Happiness and Well-being — Polling Exercise

The poll conducted among five individuals aimed to explore perceptions of happiness, whether their responses lean towards hedonic or eudaimonic interpretations, and personal insights into what constitutes a good life. The questions centered on what makes respondents happy, their self-assessment of living the good life, and desired changes for increased happiness.

Each respondent's answers were carefully evaluated to classify their responses. Hedonic happiness typically involves pleasure and the avoidance of pain, focusing on immediate gratification and sensory experiences (Kahneman et al., 1999). Eudaimonic happiness, on the other hand, relates to meaning, purpose, and self-realization (Ryff & Singer, 2008).

For example, one respondent indicated that spending time with family and pursuing hobbies makes them happy, which could reflect hedonic elements, whereas another highlighted achieving personal goals and contributing to society, indicating eudaimonic values. The overall trend showed that most respondents valued relationships and personal growth over transient pleasures, suggesting a blend of hedonic and eudaimonic pursuits in their definitions of happiness.

The common belief among participants was that meaningful relationships and authentic self-expression are central to genuine happiness and a fulfilling life. Many expressed that material possessions or superficial pleasures provide temporary satisfaction, but lasting happiness derives from purpose-driven activities and personal development.

These findings align with existing research that suggests well-being encompasses both hedonic pleasures and eudaimonic fulfillment, with many individuals striving for a balance between these dimensions (Diener et al., 2018). Recognizing this balance can inform policies and personal practices to enhance overall happiness and life satisfaction.

Assignment 3: Disease Model Versus Positive Psychology – William

William's scenario presents a case where traditional psychology and positive psychology offer contrasting perspectives on understanding and addressing his well-being. From the disease model standpoint, William's situation is viewed as a manifestation of underlying psychological or physiological issues warranting diagnosis and treatment. His high blood pressure, weight gain, worries, and feelings of pointlessness indicate possible depression or stress-related health problems (Beck, 2011).

Most important in this approach is identifying symptoms, understanding their causes, and developing interventions such as counseling, lifestyle modifications, or medication. A psychologist working within this model might recommend clinical therapy to manage stress and anxiety, health interventions for weight and blood pressure, and possibly pharmacological treatment. The goal would be to eliminate or control the symptoms, restore functioning, and prevent further deterioration (Harvard Medical School, 2018).

Conversely, positive psychology focuses on fostering strengths, resilience, and meaningful engagement to improve life satisfaction. Applying this perspective, interventions would aim to rebuild William’s sense of purpose, strengthen social connections, and promote positive emotions. Strategies might include gratitude exercises, strength-based counseling, or encouraging involvement in activities aligned with past passions, like designing furniture (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000).

From this viewpoint, addressing William’s sense of meaninglessness and enhancing well-being involves building on his existing strengths and cultivating positive experiences. The goal is not merely symptom reduction but creating a flourishing life, even in the presence of health challenges (Seligman, 2011). Overall, integrating both approaches can provide a comprehensive support system, addressing immediate health concerns while fostering long-term resilience and purpose.

References

• Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. Guilford Publications.
• Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2018). National accounts of well-being. Oxford University Press.
• Harvard Medical School. (2018). Hypertension and its management. Harvard Health Publishing.
• Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
• Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 Management Principles from the World's Greatest Manufacturer. McGraw-Hill.
• Montgomery, D. C. (2012). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. John Wiley & Sons.
• Pande, P. S., Neuman, R., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies Are Honing Their Performance. McGraw-Hill.
• Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of happiness studies, 9(1), 13-39.
• Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. Free Press.
• Sohal, A., & Pervan, S. (2005). Quality improvement initiatives in manufacturing industry: a review and framework. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(8), 735-753.