There Are Two Questions And Each Answer Should Be 150

There Are 2 Questions And Each Question Answer Should Be 150 200 Words

Question 1a: Reflect on the video, “America’s greatest speeches,” and provide a brief Political Science summary. Why do political scientists argue that public speaking and speeches could be powerful in influencing society as a whole? Include 2-3 examples, discussing America’s greatest speech.

Political scientists emphasize the influential power of public speaking and speeches as a means of shaping societal values, fostering national unity, and inspiring change. Speeches serve as powerful tools to communicate ideals, rally support, and sway public opinion, thus directly impacting political outcomes and societal development. For instance, Martin Luther King Jr.’s "I Have a Dream" speech catalyzed the civil rights movement, inspiring millions to pursue equality and justice. Similarly, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “The Only Thing We Have to Fear is Fear Itself” bolstered national morale during the Great Depression, encouraging resilience among Americans. Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address redefined national purpose amidst the Civil War, emphasizing unity and sacrifice. These speeches exemplify how compelling rhetoric can mobilize citizens, influence policy, and shape national identity. Consequently, political scientists recognize that eloquent speeches possess the capacity to evoke emotional responses, reinforce shared values, and ultimately persuade society to embrace significant change or uphold core principles.

Paper For Above instruction

Public speaking has historically played a fundamental role in shaping political landscapes and influencing societal development. Political scientists argue that speeches hold the power to inspire, mobilize, and sway public opinion, which can lead to profound societal change. Leadership speeches often serve as pivotal moments that encapsulate national ideals, motivate citizens during crises, and influence policy directions. The effectiveness of such speeches lies in their capacity to evoke emotional responses, foster a sense of unity, and articulate visions that resonate with audiences. For example, Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech is a hallmark of persuasive rhetoric that mobilized the civil rights movement, fostering a collective desire for racial equality. Likewise, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s “The Only Thing We Have to Fear” speech provided hope during economic despair, strengthening communal resilience. Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address redefined the purpose of the Civil War, emphasizing national unity and sacrifice. These historical examples demonstrate how speeches can serve as catalysts for societal transformation by inspiring action, reinforcing shared identity, and shaping moral and political values. Consequently, political scientists recognize that the strategic use of speech can influence societal trajectories significantly, emphasizing the importance of rhetoric in political leadership and social change.

Question 1b: Complete Discussion #1b

The documentary “Why Some Countries Are Poor and Others Rich” explores various factors influencing national wealth disparities. Three primary determinants include resource endowment, institutional quality, and technological development. Resource endowment refers to the natural resources a country possesses, which can provide a foundation for economic growth if managed effectively. For example, countries rich in oil or minerals may generate significant revenue that boosts development. Institutional quality pertains to governance, rule of law, and political stability, which are crucial for creating an environment conducive to investment and economic activity. Effective institutions prevent corruption and encourage long-term planning, as seen in Scandinavian countries. Technological advancement plays a vital role in increasing productivity and competitiveness. Countries investing in innovation tend to grow faster and have higher living standards. The most intriguing insight from the documentary was how institutional failure, such as corruption and weak governance, can severely impede economic progress regardless of resource wealth. I believe that the divergence in national wealth stems from how countries utilize their resources, establish robust institutions, and embrace technological innovation—factors essential for sustainable development and prosperity.

References

• King Jr., M. L. (1963). I Have a Dream. Lincoln Memorial, Washington D.C.
• Roosevelt, F. D. (1933). First Inaugural Address. U.S. Capitol.
• Lincoln, A. (1863). Gettysburg Address. Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
• Bates, R. H. (2008). When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. Cambridge University Press.
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Crown Business.
• Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. W. W. Norton & Company.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
• Rodrik, D. (2007). One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton University Press.
• Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Collier, P. (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It. Oxford University Press.