This Assignment Asks You To Demonstrate The Course Competenc

This assignment asks you to demonstrate the course competency of Globa

This assignment asks you to demonstrate the course competency of Global Perspective by constructing an evidence-based argument that integrates multiple perspectives on an issue in Modern US History. The ability to understand different perspectives is not only a critical skill for historians but also essential for functioning as a well-informed citizen in society today. The task involves creating a dialogue between two historical figures to explore various viewpoints on a specific issue.

The goal is to develop skills such as devising a hypothetical dialogue between two figures on an important historical issue, reconstructing each figure’s perspective in your own words, and critically analyzing these perspectives using primary sources and prior knowledge. Specifically, you will focus on the issue of women's suffrage around 1920.

Paper For Above instruction

To fulfill this assignment, you will first carefully review two primary source newsletters: "The Remonstrance against Woman Suffrage" and "The Suffragist." These documents present contrasting viewpoints on women's suffrage, providing insights into the debates of the time. You should analyze their arguments, noting similarities and differences, to deepen your understanding of the historical perspectives involved.

Next, craft a dialog or letter exchange between two women in 1920 who are on opposite sides of the suffrage debate. To make the assignment engaging, you might choose a relationship such as mother and daughter, friends, or sisters. Your goal is to craft a persuasive conversation in which each woman attempts to change the other's mind, clearly articulating their perspectives and reasons.

The dialog should consist of either at least four short letters or a spoken exchange, with each section being approximately one paragraph. Through this creative exercise, demonstrate your ability to analyze historical arguments and synthesize multiple perspectives effectively.

Remember that your response should be grounded in the primary sources provided, incorporate critical thinking, and reflect an understanding of the broader social and political context of 1920 regarding women's suffrage. This exercise will help develop your skills in evidence-based reasoning, perspective-taking, and historical empathy, all of which are essential for a comprehensive understanding of U.S. history and for your academic growth.

References

• Remonstrance against Woman Suffrage, 1920. Nineteenth Century Collections Online.
• The Suffragist, VII, no. . Nineteenth Century Collections Online.
• Banaszak, L. A. (2010). women’s Movements and the Politics of Gender Equality. Cambridge University Press.
• Murray, R. (1997). The Politics of Women's Suffrage. Indiana University Press.
• Flexner, E., & Fitzpatrick, E. (1996). Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States. Harvard University Press.
• Purvis, J., & Hill, L. (Eds.). (2010). Women’s Suffrage: Perspectives Across the Disciplines. Routledge.
• Kerber, L. K. (1997). No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Constitution, 1790-1920. Oxford University Press.
• McMillen, S. (2014). Women's Suffrage and the Limits of Gender Equality. University of Chicago Press.
• Dubois, M., & Dumenil, L. (2018). Through Women's Eyes: An American History with Documents. Bedford/St. Martin's.
• Flexner, E. (1959). Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States. Harvard University Press.