This Assignment Will Allow You To Further Explore Programmin

This assignment will allow you to further explore programs that are th

This assignment will allow you to further explore programs that are the future of juvenile justice. To begin, access and read the following article from the Academic OneFile database in the CSU Online Library: Keena, L. (2015). Restorative justice and higher education: The interactive classroom. Corrections Today, 77(3), 54-59. After reading the article, submit a video summarizing the article.

Please include the following components in your video:

• Provide a short introduction of the article to include the main idea(s).
• Include the purpose of this article.
• Provide an evaluation of the article:
  • Is the main idea important?
  • Does this article relate to juvenile delinquency; why, or why not?
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the article?
  • Was it well written, organized, and easy to understand?
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Is the article supported by evidence?
  • Did the author forget anything?

Your video must be a minimum of eight minutes in length.

Paper For Above instruction

The article by Keena (2015) titled "Restorative justice and higher education: The interactive classroom" explores innovative approaches to juvenile justice through the lens of restorative practices implemented within higher education settings. The main idea of the article emphasizes the potential of restorative justice (RJ) to transform juvenile delinquency intervention by fostering a more inclusive, understanding, and rehabilitative environment. It advocates for integrating RJ principles into college programs, thereby promoting meaningful dialogue, accountability, and community involvement in juvenile justice solutions.

The purpose of this article is to highlight the effectiveness and applications of restorative justice within educational contexts, aiming to prepare future professionals and policymakers involved in juvenile justice. Keena demonstrates how interactive classroom models rooted in RJ principles can enhance empathy, reduce recidivism, and support juvenile rehabilitation efforts. The article underscores the importance of education as a tool for social change and examines how higher education institutions can serve as platforms for restorative practices that benefit juvenile offenders and society alike.

Evaluating the significance of this article involves assessing its core arguments and their implications for juvenile justice reform. The importance of the main idea is considerable, as traditional punitive measures often fail to address the root causes of delinquency or promote genuine rehabilitation. Restorative justice offers a more holistic approach that emphasizes accountability, relationship-building, and community reintegration, which are crucial aspects of effective juvenile intervention.

This article directly relates to juvenile delinquency because it discusses methods for addressing juvenile offenses through restorative practices, which are increasingly recognized as effective alternatives to incarceration. RJ practices focus on repairing harm, engaging offenders, victims, and communities, and fostering a sense of responsibility—elements central to reducing juvenile recidivism.

Among the strengths of Keena's article is its comprehensive overview of RJ principles and its application within higher education. The article is well-organized, well-written, and accessible, making complex concepts understandable for a diverse audience. Its non-technical language and practical examples enhance clarity. However, a limitation is that it primarily discusses theoretical applications and may lack detailed empirical data or long-term outcome studies to substantiate the effectiveness of these practices.

The intended audience appears to be educators, juvenile justice professionals, policymakers, and students interested in criminal justice reform. The article is supported by evidence, including case studies and references to programs already implementing restorative justice principles. Nonetheless, additional empirical research and longitudinal data could strengthen the article's arguments further.

Overall, the article succeeds in highlighting the potential benefits of integrating restorative justice into higher education and juvenile justice systems. It emphasizes the importance of shifting from punitive models towards more rehabilitative, community-based approaches. The author may have overlooked some challenges related to implementing RJ on a broader scale, such as institutional resistance or resource constraints, which could be addressed in future research.

References

• Keena, L. (2015). Restorative justice and higher education: The interactive classroom. Corrections Today, 77(3), 54-59.

• Berman (Ed.), Restorative justice: Repairing harm and rebuilding trust (pp. 241-262). Criminal Justice Press.