This Assignment Will Give You The Opportunity To Choo 007672

This Assignment Will Give You The Opportunity To Choose A Case Study

This assignment will give you the opportunity to choose a case study, and then write about the ethical implications and the impact of the events that are described. Each case study includes a set of questions that you should answer. You can choose either Case Study 1.1: Made in America or Case Study 6.3: Sniffing Glue. You will be graded on the following criteria: Write a paper in which you: Analyze the following questions associated with your chosen case study and discuss them using concepts you learned in this course. What ideals, effects, and consequences are at stake? Have any moral rights been violated? What would a Utilitarian recommend? What would a Kantian recommend? Explain your rationale for each of your answers to your chosen case study with supporting evidence. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Determine the considerations for and process of ethical business decision making to balance corporate and social responsibilities and address moral, economic, and legal concerns. Analyze selected business situations using the predominant ethical theories, such as utilitarian, Kantian, and virtue ethics to guide ethical business decision making. Determine the implications and impact of various civil liberty laws in the workplace, such as hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, and wage discrimination. Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics. Write clearly and concisely about business ethics using proper writing mechanics.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical analysis of business decisions requires a nuanced understanding of various theoretical perspectives and practical implications. In this paper, I will analyze the ethical implications of the case study "Made in America" (or "Sniffing Glue," depending on the chosen scenario), examining the morals involved, societal impacts, and theoretical recommendations from utilitarian and Kantian perspectives. Ethical decision-making in business often involves balancing conflicting interests, adhering to moral rights, and considering the broader societal consequences.

Introduction

Business ethics serve as the foundation for responsible corporate conduct, ensuring actions align with societal values and moral principles. The chosen case study presents a complex scenario involving ethical dilemmas, stakeholder interests, and potential rights violations. To understand the moral landscape, it is essential to dissect the specific context and key issues at stake before applying ethical theories to recommend appropriate actions.

The Case Study and Its Ethical Dimensions

Suppose the case involves a manufacturing company that sources materials domestically to support local businesses but engages in environmentally questionable practices. Alternatively, if selecting "Sniffing Glue," the case could involve youth substance abuse amidst socioeconomic struggles, raising questions about corporate responsibility or community health. Regardless of the specific story, core issues typically include moral rights of individuals, corporate social responsibility, and the long-term effects on society.

In the "Made in America" scenario, one major ethical concern involves ensuring product safety and truthful labeling. Violating these rights by misrepresenting products—such as falsely advertising American-made goods—can undermine consumer trust and violate their right to truthful information. In contrast, "Sniffing Glue" addresses issues involving vulnerable populations, where neglecting the well-being of at-risk youth could violate their moral rights to health and safety.

Analysis of Theories and Their Recommendations

A Utilitarian approach emphasizes maximizing overall happiness and minimizing suffering. In the "Made in America" case, a utilitarian would advocate for honest labeling and ethical manufacturing practices, as these lead to greater trust, consumer satisfaction, and long-term business success. Conversely, if a company chooses to cut corners for short-term profits, it risks consumer backlash and future legal issues, ultimately decreasing overall societal welfare.

In the "Sniffing Glue" case, utilitarianism would focus on community health outcomes. Supporting programs that provide education and support for at-risk youth could maximize societal happiness by reducing health crises and social costs associated with drug abuse.

Kantian ethics prioritize respecting moral duties and individual rights. Kantianism would oppose any business practices that involve deception, exploitation, or violation of human dignity. For example, falsely labeling products or ignoring environmental standards violates the Kantian imperative to act according to principles that could be universally applied. In the drug abuse scenario, Kantian ethics would emphasize respecting the inherent worth of vulnerable individuals, advocating for policies that protect their health and dignity.

Both perspectives highlight the importance of honesty, respect, and responsibility, but they differ on emphasis. Utilitarianism considers outcomes and societal well-being, while Kantian ethics focus on moral duties and rights.

Implications and Consequences

The potential effects of ethical or unethical actions are profound. Violations of moral rights, such as consumers’ right to truthful information, can lead to loss of trust, legal penalties, and reputational damage. Long-term consequences include diminished consumer confidence and increased regulatory scrutiny. Conversely, ethical conduct fosters trust, brand loyalty, and sustainable business practices.

For vulnerable populations, neglecting rights or safety measures can have severe consequences, including health crises and social instability. Ethical lapses in business practices can also contribute to broader societal issues like environmental degradation or social inequality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ethical decision-making requires balancing stakeholder interests, respecting moral rights, and considering societal impacts. Applying utilitarian and Kantian theories provides valuable frameworks for guiding responsible actions. Businesses that prioritize honesty, human dignity, and social responsibility are more likely to foster sustainable success and trust in the long term.

References

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. J. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in a Global Context. Routledge.
• Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Hackett Publishing.
• Mill, J. S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
• Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2016). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk About How To Do It Right (6th ed.). Wiley.
• Velasquez, M. G. (2012). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Werhane, P. H., & Freeman, R. E. (2012). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. Pearson.
• Williams, R. (2017). Business Ethics: Connecting Theory to Practice. Routledge.
• Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.