This Is A Collaborative Learning Community Clc Assign 282881

This Is A Collaborative Learning Community Clc Assignmenteach Membe

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment. Each member of the CLC group will individually choose and interview one leader. You may not interview a family member. Examples of leaders include, but are not limited to, former or current managers or supervisors, educational leaders, civic/business leaders, and religious leaders. This interview can take place over the phone, through email, or in person.

To ensure that the interviews yield comparable results, the CLC group must prepare a list of questions to ask the chosen leaders (interviewees). As a team, choose four questions from the following list: What are the most important qualities an effective leader should have? What is the importance of trust in leadership? What are the qualities you want most in an employee? Why? Who has had the most influence on how you lead? Why? In what areas would you like to improve your leadership? How do your employees react to your leadership? Have you engaged in 360-degree feedback? If so, what has been the result? What is the role of effective communication in leadership? How would you rate yourself at being able to communicate with all your important stakeholders? In addition to the four interview questions that your team has chosen from the list, the CLC group will develop two additional questions, creating a final list of six questions total. Each CLC team member is required to ask their individually chosen leader the same interview questions from the group list.

It is imperative that the questions are decided on as a group. Individual Presentation After conducting the interview, CLC team members will individually create a leadership profile of their chosen leader in a PowerPoint presentation. The PowerPoint presentations must be a total of five or six slides per CLC team member. The following must be included in each individual leadership profile: An introduction slide that introduces the chosen leader A justification for choosing that particular leader A summary of the answers to the interview questions A description of the leadership model with which the leader seems most closely aligned Group Presentation After CLC team members have created their individual leadership profiles, the group will compile the individual team members' slide sets into a group PowerPoint presentation (20-24 slides, based on a four-person group). For the combined group presentation, create one or two additional slides (for a total of 22-26 slides, based on a four-person group) to provide the following information: A summary that describes any characteristics of servant leadership displayed by any of the leaders Other commonalities among the leaders, in terms of values, beliefs, and influence on the community.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves multiple steps centered around understanding leadership through interviews and collaborative presentations. Each student in a group will select a leader outside their family for an interview, prepare six targeted questions—originally choosing four from a provided list and crafting two additional questions—and conduct the interview via preferred communication channels. The preparation and questions are to be agreed upon collectively to ensure consistency.

Following the interview, each student will develop a PowerPoint profile of their leader. This profile must contain an introduction to the leader, the rationale behind selecting them, a summary of the interview responses, and an analysis of the leadership model that best fits the leader's style. The individual slides should total five or six, ensuring clarity and focus.

Subsequently, the group will merge individual slides into a comprehensive presentation, comprising approximately 20 to 24 slides for a four-member team. This collective presentation will be augmented with one or two additional slides highlighting any manifestation of servant leadership among the leaders and identifying shared values, beliefs, or influences on the community. Each slide should be well-supported with academic citations to lend credibility and depth to the analysis.

Throughout this process, adherence to proper APA format for citations and a focus on high-quality academic writing are essential. The final deliverable should provide a thorough exploration of leadership qualities, communication, influence, and community impact, grounded in scholarly literature. The assignment aims to enhance understanding of leadership models, including transformational, servant, and authentic leadership theories, and their practical application in diverse contexts.

References

  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). Free Press.
  • Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
  • Spears, L. C. (1995). Reflections on leadership and servant-leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16(7), 4-10.
  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
  • Ciulla, J. B. (2004). Ethics and leadership effectiveness. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Jacobsen, & S. J. Connelly (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 119-146). Sage Publications.
  • SchSR, T., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). Context, leader characteristics, and leader effectiveness: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 779-807.