This Week's Assignment Is Step 1: Introduction And Problem S

This Weeks Assignment Is Step 1 Introduction And Problem Statement

This week’s assignment is STEP 1 – Introduction and Problem Statement. The student will select a clinical question from the approved list of PICOt/clinical questions and customize it to meet their interest. The specific PICOT question chosen pertains to a medical-surgical hospital unit and examines how implementing hourly nursing rounding (I), compared to no scheduled rounding (C), affects patient safety (O) within six months of implementation (T). The PICOT question is as follows: in a medical-surgical hospital unit (P), how does implementing hourly nursing rounding (I), compared to no scheduled rounding (C), affect patient safety (O), within 6 months of implementing (T)?

The student will then use the provided outline to craft their assignment and submit it as a Word document via the designated assignment link. The assignment must include a title that conveys or describes the project. The introduction should present an overview of the topic or project, clearly explaining what the project will cover and the potential benefits of its implementation. The overview of the problem should summarize the problem's relevance and indicate its significance or contribution to nursing practice.

All references must be cited using the APA 6th edition manual. The completed paper should be approximately four pages long, formatted according to the specifications, and include the relevant citations and references. The file should be named following the format: Student First Name_Last Name_Part 1.

Paper For Above instruction

Implementing structured nursing interventions such as hourly rounding has garnered extensive attention for its potential to improve patient safety in hospital settings. The proposed project aims to explore the impact of hourly nursing rounding on patient safety outcomes within medical-surgical units, offering a significant contribution to evidence-based nursing practice. This paper elaborates on the background of the problem, the significance of the intervention, and the anticipated benefits of implementing hourly rounding.

Introduction

Patient safety remains a critical concern within healthcare systems globally, especially in hospital settings where patients are vulnerable to falls, pressure ulcers, medication errors, and other adverse events. Ensuring safety involves a multifaceted approach, including staff education, environmental modifications, and structured clinical protocols. Among these interventions, hourly nursing rounding has emerged as a proactive strategy designed to identify and address patient needs promptly, thereby reducing the likelihood of safety breaches. Implementing this approach on medical-surgical units presents a promising method for enhancing patient outcomes and fostering a safer care environment.

Overview of the Problem

Research indicates that patient safety incidents, including falls and pressure ulcers, are prevalent in medical-surgical units, often due to inconsistent monitoring and response times. Despite the availability of evidence supporting hourly rounding, its adoption remains inconsistent across healthcare facilities due to staffing constraints, resistance to change, and lack of awareness. The problem is accentuated in medical-surgical units, where patient acuity varies, and the risk of adverse events is significant. The lack of a systematic approach to patient monitoring can result in missed signals of deteriorating conditions or unmet needs, potentially leading to preventable harm.

Implementing hourly nursing rounding has the potential to mitigate such risks by ensuring nurses routinely check on patients’ comfort, safety, and specific needs. Studies suggest that structured rounding can decrease fall rates, pressure ulcers, and call light usage, leading to improved patient satisfaction and safety metrics. However, the evidence remains variable, and further research is necessary to quantify its effectiveness in specific hospital settings and contexts. This project aims to contribute to this body of evidence by evaluating the effects over a six-month period post-implementation, providing insights into its sustainability and practical benefits within medical-surgical units.

References

  • Huang, J., et al. (2017). Effects of hourly rounding on patient outcomes and satisfaction: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 32(3), 229–235.https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000237
  • Hsieh, C. & Kuo, S. (2018). The impact of nurse-led hourly rounding interventions on fall and pressure ulcer prevention in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1-2), e87–e98.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13970
  • Joash, K. & Sokol, A. G. (2016). Reviewing the evidence for hourly rounding: A comprehensive overview. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 11(4), 259–264.https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.2539
  • Mitchell, P. H., et al. (2014). Patient safety in hospitalized older adults: The role of nursing interventions. Journal of Geriatric Nursing, 35(2), 89–94.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2014.01.007
  • U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019). Strategies to prevent fall injuries in hospitals. AHRQ Publications.https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/resources/resources/falls.html
  • Walker, A., et al. (2016). Implementing hourly rounding: Impact on patient safety outcomes. Journal of Nursing Administration, 46(5), 254–259.https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000350
  • World Health Organization. (2019). Patient safety curriculum guide: Multi-professional edition. WHO Press.
  • Peppard, T. & Augus, J. (2015). Enhancing patient safety through nursing-led interventions. Nursing Times, 111(4), 12–15.
  • Kelly, M., et al. (2018). Effectiveness of hourly rounding in hospital units: A systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 27(2), 142–150.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006793
  • Johnson, D., et al. (2019). Best practices for nursing interventions to improve patient safety. Journal of Healthcare Safety, 35(3), 150–157.https://doi.org/10.1097/SHS.0000000000000552