Threatened Species Introduction — Unit V Homework ✓ Solved
Threatened Species Introduction — Unit V Homework Assignment
Threatened Species Introduction — Unit V Homework Assignment Worksheet This unit is about ecology, the study of the interaction between living species. As we discussed in the unit lesson, all species are dependent on one another—even trees need birds to eat the insects that want to devour the trees. Some trees, like oaks, need squirrels to plant their acorns. Consequently, when you study a species in the Red List for this assignment, be aware that somewhere along the line, this species is important. Materials Needed: A computer with Internet access.
Directions:
1. Click on (or copy and paste the URL into your browser) to go to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species website. The site may load somewhat slowly, so be patient.
2. Take a moment to peruse the website. Scroll down and look at a few of the animals and the news articles.
3. On the Redlist home page, type the state in which you reside in the search box where it says “names - common, scientific, regions etc…” (see below). A list of species will appear in a drop-down menu. You can select “more species” from the drop-down menu to see more. You will want to study a species that lives near you and upon which you might be able to have an impact.
Note: Make sure that the species you pick actually lives near you. For example, the “South Georgia Diving-petrel” does not live in the state of Georgia in the United States, but rather on the South Georgia Island near Antarctica. To confirm that your chosen species lives near you, select the “Geographic range in detail” link beneath the map that appears.
4. Do NOT pick a species that has a category of “least concern,” “data deficient,” or “not evaluated.” Doing so will result in a substantial point deduction.
What Information Did You Find?
Study the available information about your species and answer the following questions (in your own words—do not copy and paste from the site). When reviewing information on the site, look for “in detail” to get a more comprehensive picture (e.g., population in detail, conservation in detail, and so on). Respond to each question in the blank area following it. Each area will expand as necessary.
1. What is the common name and the scientific name of your species?
2. What is your species’ Red List category? (For example, endangered, critically endangered, or one of the others.)
3. What kind of habitat does the species inhabit? Briefly describe the habitat/biome. a. Tell what other plants and animals live in this biome.
4. What are some of the threats to the species? a. Which threats are caused by humans?
5. Does human population growth adversely impact this species? In what way?
6. Consider the population of your species. a. What is the estimated population of the organism and how was it measured? b. What is the population trend?
7. Consider the habitat for your species. a. What might be some density dependent factors? b. What might be some density independent factors? c. Briefly list ways in which climate change might be affecting this creature’s habitat. d. List two actions people can do to preserve this species and biodiversity.
8. List some things that can be done to protect this species’ habitat.
9. Is your species in an extinction vortex? Explain.
Written Response Questions
10. Discuss what it means for a species to be a keystone species, and give an example. a. Is the species you picked on the Redlist a keystone species? Why, or why not?
11. If your species becomes extinct, what changes might you expect to occur in its biome and the food web? a. Which species might benefit if your species becomes extinct, and why would that/those species benefit? b. Which species would be harmed if your species becomes extinct? c. Comment on possible interaction of these on your species: i. Mutualism (page 352 in your textbook) ii. Predation (page 352 in your textbook) iii. Competition (page 353 in your textbook)
Paper For Above Instructions
Introduction and approach. For illustrative purposes, this paper follows the unit V assignment framework by examining a threatened species that inhabits a region where learners commonly reside, the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). This species is widely cited as endangered under the IUCN Red List and under U.S. federal protections, and it provides a clear case for exploring habitat, threats, ecological roles, and conservation options (IUCN 2023; USFWS 2022). Throughout, in-text citations point to core literature on biodiversity, ecosystem function, and conservation biology to ground the analysis in established science (Soulé 1986; Paine 1969; Primack 2014; Cardinale et al. 2012; Tilman et al. 2002; MEA 2005; IPCC 2021).
1. Common name and scientific name. The Florida panther, Puma concolor coryi, is an apex carnivore historically distributed across Florida and parts of neighboring states. Its taxonomic recognition and status as an endangered population are well documented in the IUCN Red List and U.S. conservation listings (IUCN 2023; USFWS 2022).
2. Red List category. The Florida panther is categorized as Endangered on the IUCN Red List, reflecting a small, fragmented population with ongoing threats to viability. The risk designation aligns with the literature on small-population dynamics and rarity (IUCN 2023; Soulé 1986).
3. Habitat. This species inhabits pine-marsh and mosaic habitats of southern Florida, including the Everglades region, riparian corridors, and adjacent upland forests that provide cover and prey. The habitat supports deer and other mammals that panthers rely on; habitat heterogeneity and hydrology are critical for prey distribution and predator movement. Human alterations to hydrology and fire regimes have historically changed available habitat, contributing to fragmentation (IUCN 2023; MEA 2005).
a. Other biota. The panther's ecological neighborhood includes deer (Odocoileus spp.), feral hogs, and smaller mammals that serve as prey, as well as potential competitors and scavengers. Plants in the pine flatwoods and scrub communities influence prey availability and cover.”
4. Threats. Primary threats include habitat loss and fragmentation due to development and water-management changes; road mortality; genetic isolation from isolation-by-distance and reduced gene flow; and intrusion by disease and human-wildlife conflict. Climate-change-related shifts in precipitation and fire regimes may further reduce habitat suitability (IUCN 2023; Cardinale et al. 2012; MEA 2005).
a. Human-caused threats. Development and infrastructure, altered hydrology, and fire suppression have intensified habitat fragmentation and decreased prey viability. Human-caused mortality on roads and in collisions also reduces survivorship, and genetic bottlenecks reduce resilience (IUCN 2023; Soulé 1986).
5. Human population growth. Growing human populations in Florida and surrounding regions place pressure on landscapes that panthers rely on, increasing habitat loss, water extraction, and vehicle-wildlife conflicts. These pressures can degrade habitat connectivity and reduce prey populations, thereby affecting panther viability (IPCC 2021; MEA 2005).
6. Population and trend. Current estimates place adult Florida panthers in a small, isolated pool within Florida, with counts often in the low hundreds when including sub-adults. Population monitoring relies on camera traps, genetic sampling, and radio-telemetry, revealing a long-term trend of slow growth in response to conservation actions, though overall status remains Endangered due to persistent fragmentation and demographic risks (IUCN 2023; USFWS 2022).
a. Population measurement. Estimates are derived from mark-recapture analyses of genetic data, parasite loads, and telemetry to infer abundance and trend, with robust programs underway to maintain genetic diversity and monitor connectivity (USFWS 2022; Primack 2014).
b. Population trend. The trend has been variable but shows improvements in some subpopulations due to habitat protection and corridor restoration, while overall viability remains constrained by fragmentation and low effective population size (IUCN 2023; Soulé 1986).
7. Habitat considerations. Density-dependent factors include disease susceptibility, inbreeding depression, and resource competition within small populations. Density-independent factors include drought, flood events, temperature extremes, and wildfire regimes that affect prey availability and habitat structure. Climate change can alter hydrology, fire frequency, and vegetation communities, thereby affecting panther distribution and prey dynamics (MEA 2005; IPCC 2021).
a. Density-dependent factors. Inbreeding and reduced genetic diversity diminish offspring viability and fertility, potentially lowering long-term population resilience (Soulé 1986).
b. Density-independent factors. Extreme weather events, droughts or floods, and habitat disturbances influence survival and recruitment independent of current population size (IPCC 2021; Tilman et al. 2002).
c. Climate change effects. Shifts in precipitation and sea-level rise can alter wetland extent and hydrological regimes, reducing suitable habitat and prey availability while increasing human–panther conflict in altered landscapes (MEA 2005; IPCC 2021).
d. Conservation actions. To preserve this species and biodiversity, promote habitat corridors that connect fragmented populations; enhance land-use planning to minimize habitat loss; implement water-management practices that restore natural hydrology; and reduce road mortality through wildlife underpasses or other barriers to wildlife movement (Cardinale et al. 2012; Estes et al. 2011).
8. Habitat protection. Protecting remaining habitat patches, restoring connectivity, and maintaining hydrological regimes are essential. Management should emphasize proactive fire regimes, restoration of native vegetation, and controlling invasive species that alter prey dynamics and habitat structure (Tilman et al. 2002; MEA 2005).
9. Extinction vortex. The Florida panther faces an extinction vortex risk due to small effective population size, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity, which can reduce fitness and adaptive potential. These processes can become self-reinforcing unless demographic and genetic rescue through habitat protection and connectivity occurs (Soulé 1986; Paine 1969).
Written Response Questions
10. Keystone species concept. A keystone species exerts disproportionate influence on ecosystem structure relative to its abundance, often triggering trophic cascades when removed (Paine 1969). Predators can fulfill this role by regulating prey populations and maintaining community diversity; the classic example is the keystone role of sea otters in kelp forest systems and the tidepool predators that help sustain ecological balance (Paine 1969; Estes et al. 2011).
Is the Florida panther a keystone species? Not typically labeled as a classic keystone, but apex predators can act as keystone species by shaping prey communities and ecosystem processes. The panther’s presence influences deer populations and predator-prey interactions, contributing to broader community structure and functioning in its habitat (Paine 1969; Ripple et al. 2014; Estes et al. 2011).
11. Extinction consequences. If the Florida panther becomes extinct, expect shifts in prey populations, vegetation dynamics from altered herbivory, increased spread of mesopredators, and cascading effects on plant communities and habitat composition. Prey species such as white-tailed deer could increase, potentially altering vegetation structure and reducing biodiversity in certain habitats. Certain mesopredators might expand, increasing predation pressure on smaller mammals, birds, and reptiles (IPCC 2021; Cardinale et al. 2012; Tilman et al. 2002). Mutualisms, predation, and competition interactions would recalibrate as species adapt or fail under new conditions, with broader implications for ecosystem services and resilience (MEA 2005; Primack 2014).
References
- IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2023. Puma concolor coryi. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2023-3. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
- Soulé, M. E. 1986. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates.
- Paine, R. T. 1969. A Keystone Predator Maintains Structure in an Island Ecosystem. American Naturalist, 103(929), 419-430.
- Estes, J. A., Terborgh, J., Brashares, J., et al. 2011. Trophic cascades initiated by predators in the sea. Science, 333(6046), 875-878.
- Primack, R. B. 2014. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates.
- Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., et al. 2012. Biodiversity Loss and Its Impact on Humanity. Nature, 486, 59-67.
- Tilman, D., Isbell, F., Cowles, J. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature, 417, 389-395.
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2021. Climate Change 2021: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press.
- Ripple, W. J., Newsome, T. M., Wolf, C., et al. 2014. Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. BioScience, 64(3), 231-241.