Throughout This Course We Have Been Focusing Our Attention
Throughout This Course We Have Been Focusing Our Attention On The Pra
Throughout this course, we have been focusing our attention on the practice of arguing to find meaning. Because of that, it is important to practice balancing opposing viewpoints of a single issue. This essay allows you the chance to do just that. Much of the writing you will be doing throughout your academic and professional career will be argumentative; thus, this essay will help you to hone your rhetorical skills in several ways: First, this essay will help you to establish an environment of civilized discourse within your writing (essential for productive argumentation); Secondly, this essay will allow you to practice your research skills in both identifying and integrating sound arguments; And thirdly, this essay gives you a chance to practice your critical thinking skills—skills you will need for success throughout your academic and professional life.
Remember, the purpose of this essay is not to prove whether you are right or wrong, but instead prove that you can fairly present two sides of an argument and logically determine the best solution to the problem you are faced with. With that in mind, we ask that you withhold your personal opinion, personal judgments of the material, or personal narrative until the concluding remarks of your essay. Note that no one writes a polished essay in a single sitting. Start early and give yourself time for multiple revisions. The rough draft of your essay should meet the following guidelines: is between 900 and 1200 words in length; includes direct quotations and paraphrased passages from four or more scholarly texts representing more than one side of the issue; qualifies each of the authors (authors representing each side of the debate should have compatible credibility); withholds personal opinion until the conclusion of the essay; is written clearly, concisely, and accurately; is written primarily in third-person; includes a References page; has been closely edited so that it contains few or no mechanical errors.
Researched Argument Checklist: Use this to evaluate your rough draft against the assignment requirements: Does this essay present a clear argument on a topic? Does this essay treat two sides of the argument equally and fairly? Does the essay cite, at minimum, four scholarly sources? Are the authors for the articles qualified? Who are they? Use signal phrases/attributive tags to introduce the authors. What is the purpose of this essay? What does it do to meet that purpose? How effective is the argument? Does this essay avoid second person language and limit first person language? Are there elements of pathos, ethos, and logos in this essay? Do these appeals work together to propose a solution? Does the essay avoid logical fallacy in the reasoning behind the solution? Does the essay use APA in-text citation and is there a APA format references page?
Paper For Above instruction
The art of argumentative writing is fundamental in academic and professional contexts, serving as a tool for critical engagement and understanding complex issues from multiple perspectives. The emphasis of this assignment is to develop a balanced, fair, and evidence-based argument that presents both sides of a contentious issue, ultimately leading to a reasoned conclusion without personal bias. This essay requires engaging with scholarly sources, integrating their viewpoints fairly, and demonstrating critical thinking and rhetorical skills. In this context, I will explore the debate surrounding [insert specific issue], assessing arguments from different credible perspectives, and analyzing the validity and implications of each.
To initiate a balanced discussion, scholarly voices like [Author A] and [Author B] present contrasting views on [issue]. For instance, [Author A], a renowned expert in [field], argues that [main point], citing extensive research that supports [his/her/their] position (Author, Year). Conversely, [Author B], also a respected authority, challenges this perspective by emphasizing [opposing view], supported by data indicating that [evidence]. These differing opinions highlight the complexity inherent in [issue], necessitating a nuanced examination that considers the strengths and weaknesses of each position.
Further, the research conducted by [Author C] introduces additional dimensions to the debate. [He/She/They] argue that [argument], which is substantiated by empirical data and case studies (Author, Year). On the other hand, [Author D] counters with a perspective that underscores [alternative view], backed by theoretical frameworks and historical analysis (Author, Year). Both viewpoints underscore the importance of context, suggesting that the solution to [problem] cannot be purely simplistic or one-sided.
The goal of this essay is not to advocate for a specific side but to fairly represent these opposing arguments, analyze their merits and shortcomings, and propose a reasoned resolution based on evidence. Elements of ethos (credibility of sources), logos (logical reasoning and evidence), and pathos (emotional appeal in narrative or rhetoric) will be employed strategically to support a balanced argument. For example, the credibility of sources like [Author A] and [Author B], combined with compelling data, bolsters the logos of the overall argument (Author, Year). Similarly, establishing ethos through citation of well-respected academics enhances the trustworthiness of the analysis (Author, Year). While emotional appeals may play a minor role, care will be taken to ensure that reasoning remains logical and well-supported.
In conclusion, after considering and critically evaluating the arguments from multiple credible sources, the most effective resolution to [issue] appears to be [proposed solution], which considers the various perspectives and evidence. This approach seeks to maximize benefits while minimizing drawbacks, adhering to the principles of balanced, evidence-based reasoning. While personal opinions are reserved for the closing remarks, the analytical process illustrates the importance of fair and objective engagement with complex issues, a critical skill for academic and professional success.
References
- Author A. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author B. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author C. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Author D. (Year). Title of scholarly article. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), pages. https://doi.org/xxxxx
- Additional credible sources as needed for a total of six references, formatted appropriately.