To Accept Or Reject A Client: Clo 1 7a Well Known Profession

To Accept Or Reject A Client Clo 1 7a Well Known Professional Baseb

Evaluate the ethical considerations and implications of accepting a client, a well-known professional baseball player, who is suspected of using performance-enhancing drugs. The client has not been formally charged but has admitted to the agent that he may have unknowingly taken substances that could be steroids. The agent requests assistance in managing media coverage and shaping public perception positively. The decision to accept or reject this client involves weighing ethical concerns, potential professional benefits, and the impact of the client's admission on the ethical stance. Additionally, the decision should consider similar past cases and develop a well-reasoned recommendation for business partners, including legal and ethical analyses.

Paper For Above instruction

The ethical landscape of managing public relations for athletes suspected of doping is complex and fraught with moral dilemmas. The question at hand is whether a public relations professional should accept a client who is under investigation for illicit drug use, especially when the client has admitted to a possibly unintentional ingestion of banned substances. Several ethical principles come into play, including honesty, loyalty, professional integrity, and social responsibility. This paper explores these principles in the context of the case, compares it to similar historical instances, and offers a considered recommendation for business partners.

At the core of this dilemma is the tension between the desire to provide effective representation and the imperative to maintain ethical standards. Accepting a client suspected of doping, particularly with an admission of unknowing ingestion, raises concerns about complicity and the professional integrity of the public relations firm. Ethical codes from organizations like the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) emphasize honesty and transparency, especially when the public's trust is involved (PRSA, 2019). Assisting in the shaping of media narratives for an individual who may have committed a moral or legal breach can be seen as compromising these values. Conversely, defending the client against potential damage—even without confirming guilt—aligns with principles of loyalty and providing legal rights, provided the communication remains honest.

Furthermore, the case bears similarities to the notable instance of baseball star Alex Rodriguez, who was implicated in performance-enhancing drug scandals. Rodriguez initially denied allegations but later admitted to using banned substances in a bid to restore his reputation (Hoberman, 2014). Public relations teams working with Rodriguez faced ethical questions about the extent to which they could promote a positive image while acknowledging the athlete’s misconduct. These cases illustrate that transparency, remorse, and accountability often influence public perception more sustainably than outright deception. Ethical practice suggests that PR efforts should focus on honesty, emphasizing athlete rehabilitation and the integrity of the sport rather than outright image denial or manipulation.

Opportunities for a PR firm include the chance to support the athlete in framing the narrative around rehabilitation and personal growth, aligning with the principle of social responsibility. Yet, the risk lies in potentially endorsing or glossing over unethical behavior. Accepting the client may lead to reputational risks if the allegations confirm or intensify, but declining could impact future business opportunities and professional credibility. Therefore, the moral choice hinges on whether the agency can navigate a path of honest communication—highlighting the athlete’s remorse, commitment to clean play, and cooperation with investigations—without crossing ethical boundaries.

Legal and ethical frameworks support honesty and transparency while allowing strategic communication that respects the client's rights. According to Coombs and Holladay (2012), ethical crisis communication involves managing truthfulness and maintaining stakeholder trust. This suggests that if the firm proceeds, it must avoid deception and should educate the public about the athlete’s unintentional use, if credible evidence supports such a claim. Furthermore, engaging in this process aligns with the broader social responsibility to uphold integrity and fairness in sport.

In conclusion, accepting the client involves significant ethical considerations but can be justified if approached with honesty, transparency, and a commitment to social responsibility. The firm should not engage in deceptive practices but instead develop messaging that emphasizes personal accountability, the unwitting nature of the ingestion, and the athlete’s commitment to change. Given the parallels with Alex Rodriguez's case, adopting a strategy centered on integrity and rehabilitation may ultimately foster a resilient and reputable image.

References

• Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). The handbook of crisis communication. John Wiley & Sons.
• Hoberman, J. (2014). The reputation game: The fall of Alex Rodriguez and the legacy of baseball’s dirty secret. The New York Times.
• Public Relations Society of America. (2019). PRSA code of ethics. https://www.prsa.org/ethics
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin Books.
• Cooper, C. R., & Quinton, S. (1990). Ethical policies and practice of public relations. Public Relations Review, 16(2), 81-88.
• Williams, K. D. (2010). Sport and the ethics of management. Routledge.
• Schneider, N. (2015). The sports integrity model: An ethical approach to sports management. Journal of Sport Management, 29(3), 245-258.
• Bowen, S. (2018). Media relations and ethics: A case study approach. Journal of Public Relations Research, 30(4), 150-162.
• Millar, D., & Williams, B. (2016). Ethical dilemmas in sports public relations: The case of doping. International Journal of Sport Communication, 9(1), 21-36.
• Miller, K., & Clark, S. (2017). Reputation management in sport: Ethical considerations and best practices. Sport Management Review, 20(2), 105-115.