To Prepare For Your Post: Follow These Steps Select A Sectio

To Prepare For Your Post Follow These Stepsselect A Section Of Your

To prepare for your post, follow these steps: Select a section of your Final Project that you have composed in a draft form. It does not have to be finalized or edited. After examining the resources above, select at least two resources that you will use to help you improve your Final Project. Use the resources you have selected to edit the section of your Final Project you have drafted. Work on your draft using the insight gained from the resources at the Writing Center or the University of Arizona Global Campus Library.

In an initial post of at least 300 words, explain what elements of your draft you thought needed improvement prior to using the Writing Center or the University of Arizona Global Campus Library supports. As part of your post, address these issues: Identify which resources you chose to examine and explain why you decided to use them. Explain how you used the resources you chose to improve your work. Identify what elements of your work are now stronger after using these resources. Would you use these resources again in future work? Why or why not? What would you tell someone else about your experience?

Paper For Above instruction

The case study of Apple’s labor practices highlights significant ethical challenges faced by multinational corporations in managing their supply chains responsibly. As one of the world’s leading technology companies, Apple’s reputation hinges not only on product innovation but also on its ethical standards concerning labor practices and environmental sustainability. This paper reflects on my approach to improving my initial draft by leveraging specific academic resources and tools that contribute to a more nuanced understanding and effective presentation of this ethical dilemma.

Before utilizing the University of Arizona Global Campus Library and the Writing Center, I recognized certain weaknesses in my draft, particularly concerning clarity in articulating the ethical issues and depth of stakeholder analysis. My initial draft lacked detailed integration of credible sources that could substantiate my arguments about corporate responsibility. To address this, I selected scholarly articles on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical supply chain management from the university’s library databases. For example, I examined articles by researchers such as Crane and Matten (2016) and Crane, Palazzo, Spence, and Chirico (2014), who discuss the roles and responsibilities of corporations in ethically managing their global supply chains. I also used the Writing Center’s resources on citation and coherence to refine my arguments and structure my paper more logically.

Utilizing these resources, I improved my draft by expanding my analysis of the stakeholders involved—namely, consumers, suppliers, employees, and Apple’s management. I integrated specific examples from credible reports, such as Apple’s Supplier Responsibility Reports, to support claims about ongoing labor violations and corporate accountability. My paper became more concise, well-supported, and aligned with APA style standards. Additionally, I learned strategies for avoiding vague language and emphasizing evidence-based arguments, making my points more compelling and credible.

After working with these resources, I believe my work is now more comprehensive and academically rigorous. The inclusion of peer-reviewed literature and credible data strengthened my argument, making it clear that ethical lapses in supply chains are complex issues requiring responsible action from corporations like Apple. This experience reinforced the importance of engaging with academic resources regularly to enhance critical thinking and writing skills. I would definitely use these resources again in future work because they provide valuable guidance that improves the overall quality of academic writing and research.

In sharing my experience with peers, I would emphasize the importance of resource utilization in academic writing. The combination of scholarly research and institutional support can significantly elevate the quality of a project, especially when analyzing intricate ethical issues like those presented in this case study. My willingness to revisit and incorporate credible sources has improved my confidence in constructing well-supported, polished arguments for future assignments. Overall, this approach fosters continuous learning and improved academic performance.

References

• Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
• Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Chirico, F. (2014). Toward Responsible Supply Chain Management: Managing Ethical Challenges in Globalized Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 595–606.
• Apple. (2021). Supplier Responsibility—Apple Report. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/supplier-responsibility/
• Atkinson, L. (n.d.). Apple’s labor practices: An ethical assessment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
• Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
• Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2019). Ethical Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 365–377.
• Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(3), 773–792.
• World Economic Forum. (2020). Ethical Supply Chains and Responsible Business Practices. WEF Reports.
• United Nations. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. UN Human Rights Office.
• Smith, L. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(4), 545–568.