To Start Understanding Organizational Behavior Inside Your C

To Start Understanding Organizational Behavior Inside Your Company Or

To start understanding organizational behavior inside your company or institution, you first need to see the connections between the various parts of the organization including the people and teams. This activity will help you organize this information, so you can delve deeper into your organizational culture for the summative assessment. Using the Organizational Culture Assessment tool, evaluate an organization of your choosing (i.e., company/institution, non-profit association, volunteer group, church, etc.). You will use the tool below to assess the people, departments, attitudes, and culture within the organization. Rank your organization on each category AND explain why you gave this ranking. Your explanation may be included on a separate document.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding organizational behavior is essential for analyzing how individuals and groups function within an organization, influencing overall performance and culture. An effective way to explore this is through a comprehensive organizational culture assessment, which uncovers the underlying values, attitudes, and dynamics that shape organizational life.

In this paper, I will evaluate a non-profit organization committed to community service using an Organizational Culture Assessment tool. This evaluation involves rating various aspects including people, departments, attitudes, and overall culture. Each category will be assessed based on observable behaviors, policies, communication styles, and employee attitudes, followed by a detailed explanation of the ratings assigned.

Organizational Context

The selected organization is a local non-profit dedicated to youth education and empowerment. Its mission emphasizes community involvement, collaboration, and social impact. The organization comprises diverse teams including volunteers, full-time staff, and management, all working towards common goals of outreach and education.

Assessment of People

The organization’s people are highly dedicated and motivated, driven by a shared passion for community development. Staff and volunteers exhibit a strong commitment, often working beyond standard hours to ensure program success. According to the Cultural Assessment, I rate the people as highly engaged, with a score of 4.5 out of 5. This high engagement stems from intrinsic motivation linked to the organization’s mission and values.

Assessment of Departments

Departments within the organization function collaboratively but with varying degrees of cohesion and communication efficiency. The program development department demonstrates high adaptability and innovation, while administrative units are more bureaucratic, often hindered by rigid protocols. I rate the departmental culture as moderately positive, with a score of 3.5 out of 5, acknowledging the need for greater interdepartmental synergy.

Assessment of Attitudes

The organizational attitude is predominantly optimistic and proactive. Staff display a positive outlook towards challenges and are receptive to feedback and change. However, some resistance to new bureaucratic procedures indicates a tension between innovation and tradition, which slightly lowers overall attitude scores. I assign a rating of 4 out of 5, reflecting a generally positive but improvable attitude environment.

Assessment of Organizational Culture

The overall organizational culture emphasizes community service, collaboration, and social responsibility. These core values are evident in decision-making processes and external communication. Nonetheless, there are aspects of hierarchical rigidity that sometimes limit open dialogue and innovation. Based on these observations, I rate the organizational culture as a 3.75 out of 5, suggesting a culture that is values-driven but could benefit from greater flexibility and inclusivity.

Summary and Recommendations

This organizational culture assessment highlights strengths in employee dedication and clear mission orientation, balanced by areas needing improvement such as interdepartmental communication and participative decision-making. To foster a more dynamic and inclusive culture, the organization should implement training programs to enhance cross-departmental collaboration and promote open dialogue at all levels. Encouraging feedback and participative governance can further deepen engagement and innovation.

In conclusion, understanding organizational behavior through such assessments enables organizations to leverage their strengths and address weaknesses, ultimately leading to a healthier, more effective workplace culture. Continuous evaluation and adaptation are vital to sustain growth and achieve organizational goals.

References

• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Jossey-Bass.
• Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. Wiley.
• Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Culture: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Addison-Wesley.
• Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1993). The Cultures of Work Organizations. Prentice Hall.
• Hatch, M. J. (1993). The Dynamics of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 657-693.
• O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996). Culture as Social Control: Makeover Research on Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157-195.
• Martin, J. (2002). Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain. Sage Publications.
• Schneider, B. (1990). The Service Organization: Discovering the Hidden Employee. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 157-167.
• Robinson, S. P., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555-572.