Two Different Assignments You Have Now Submitted And Re

Two Different Assignmentjournalyou Have Now Submitted And Received Fee

Review all the feedback you have received from your instructor so far. Write a journal assignment that describes your approach to implementing the feedback you have received. In the assignment, be sure to address the following: Provide a general introduction describing the areas where you showed proficiency and the areas where you need improvement. Identify specific issues your instructor noted that you agree with, and describe how you will address them.

For example, if your instructor noted a place where more information was needed, what additional information will you include, and how will it help clarify your analysis? Identify specific issues your instructor noted that you disagree with, and explain why you disagree. For example, if your instructor noted a place where your conclusions were incomplete, express why they were not. Describe the steps you will take to make improvements in your final draft. To successfully complete this assignment, view the Feedback Journal Guidelines and Rubric document.

Paper For Above instruction

The process of revising academic work based on instructor feedback is essential for improving the quality of scholarly writing and deepening understanding of the subject matter. Reflecting on the feedback received, I have identified key areas where I performed well and areas that require significant improvement. This reflective journal aims to analyze my approach to implementing instructor suggestions, detailing specific actions I will undertake to enhance my final submission.

Proficiency and Areas for Improvement

In my initial submissions, I demonstrated proficiency in articulating key concepts in strategic planning within healthcare organizations. My organizational structure was clear, and I effectively linked the theoretical principles to practical applications, such as stakeholder engagement and environmental analysis. However, I acknowledged that I needed to improve in providing more detailed evidence to support my arguments and ensuring that all aspects of the assignment instructions were thoroughly addressed.

Specifically, I observed that while my analysis of the organization’s mission and vision was sound, I could have delved deeper into how these elements explicitly guide strategic decision-making. Additionally, I identified gaps in my SWOT analysis, which lacked sufficiently detailed examples and current external factors influencing the organization. Recognizing these limitations has encouraged me to seek more comprehensive data and integrate contemporary trends into my analysis.

Addressing Instructor-Reported Issues

My instructor highlighted that in some sections, I did not fully develop the rationale behind certain strategic choices. For instance, when discussing external environmental factors, I briefly mentioned trends like policy changes but did not elaborate on their specific impacts. To address this, I plan to incorporate recent policy updates and industry reports to substantiate my claims, demonstrating a clear linkage between external forces and organizational strategy.

Furthermore, I concur with the instructor on the need for a more detailed stakeholder analysis. I will expand on each stakeholder's influence, power, and interests, making explicit how they shape the strategic planning process. This approach will provide a comprehensive view of stakeholder dynamics, essential for effective healthcare management.

Addressing Disagreements and Clarifications

Some instructor comments suggested that my conclusions about the organization’s strategic positioning were somewhat overstated. I respectfully disagree to some extent. My initial analysis indicated a strong alignment between the organization’s mission and its strategic initiatives. I believe this alignment is accurate but could benefit from more concrete evidence, such as strategic documents or performance data, to substantiate my stance. I will incorporate such evidence to reinforce my assertions and ensure my analysis is both well-supported and balanced.

Additionally, I plan to clarify certain points where I believe the instructor’s critique was based on a misinterpretation of my intent. For example, in discussing policy gaps, I aimed to highlight potential areas for growth rather than criticize existing policies. I will rephrase these sections to better articulate my perspective and avoid ambiguity.

Steps for Final Draft Enhancement

To improve my final draft, I will undertake several specific actions. First, I will conduct a thorough review of current healthcare policies relevant to the case study, incorporating the latest legislation and industry standards. Second, I will strengthen my SWOT analysis by adding quantitative data and case examples that demonstrate the organization’s internal and external environment.

Third, I will expand my stakeholder analysis with more detailed descriptions of their roles and influence levels, supporting this with credible sources. Fourth, I will ensure that my conclusions are fully supported with evidence, explicitly linking strategic decisions to organizational goals and external factors.

Lastly, I will seek peer review or peer editing to identify any remaining gaps or unclear sections, which will enable me to refine my language and arguments further. This comprehensive revision process will ensure that my final submission aligns with instructor expectations and academic standards.

Conclusion

Reflecting on the feedback received has been instrumental in shaping my approach to academic writing and strategic analysis. By systematically addressing areas of strength and weakness, and implementing targeted improvements, I aim to produce a well-supported, insightful final paper. This process underscores the importance of constructive critique in scholarly growth and the continuous pursuit of clarity, coherence, and depth in academic work.

References

• Bryson, J. M. (2018). Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthen and Sustain Organizational Achievement. Wiley.
• Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). Strategic management of health care organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. Free Press.
• Schneider, A. (2020). Healthcare policy and strategic planning in the U.S. healthcare system. Journal of Healthcare Management, 65(4), 250-262.
• Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson.
• Swayne, L. E., Duncan, W. J., & Ginter, P. M. (2013). Strategic Management of Health Care Organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Free Press.
• Frederickson, H. G. (2018). Public Administration& Policy. Routledge.