Two Primary Outcomes Of Human Resource Management

Two Primary Outcomes Of Human Resource Managementassignment Overviewth

Two Primary Outcomes Of Human Resource Managementassignment Overviewth

The two primary outcomes of HR management are recruitment and retention. Through HR planning, managers anticipate the future supply of and demand for employees and the nature of workforce issues, including the retention of employees. These factors are used when recruiting applicants for job openings. Being able to recruit and retain the “best” employees has been difficult tasks for HR managers. The “best” employees are not necessarily the most qualified individuals (e.g., the most educated or with the most work experience), rather it is the individuals who provide value to an organization, who complement the organization, who understand and embrace the organization’s mission, and who fit the culture of the organization.

This quandary is a result of a number of different variables such as: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, job performance, and motivation. The following figure illustrates the two outcomes of HR management. Two Main Outcomes of HR Furthermore, contemporary HR managers also are tasked with assisting with peak performance initiatives because of escalated global demands and competition.

Paper For Above instruction

The connection between recruitment and retention lies at the core of effective human resource management. Recruitment is the process of attracting and selecting qualified candidates to fill organizational vacancies, whereas retention involves strategies to keep valuable employees engaged and committed over the long term. These two outcomes are inherently interconnected, as successful recruitment sets the foundation for retention, and strong retention strategies reinforce recruitment efforts by enhancing employer reputation and reducing turnover costs.

Effective recruitment focuses not only on identifying candidates with the necessary skills and qualifications but also on finding individuals who fit the organizational culture and share its core values. When recruitment aligns with organizational culture, new hires are more likely to feel engaged, satisfied, and committed, ultimately improving retention rates. On the other hand, poor recruitment can lead to mismatched expectations, dissatisfaction, and early turnover, which hinder organizational performance and escalate costs associated with rehiring and retraining.

Regarding the question of whether it is better to "hire hard and manage easy" or to "make up for bad selection with good training," research and management practices generally suggest that the first approach—hiring rigorous candidates who fit well within the organizational culture—is more effective in promoting long-term success. Hiring hard involves thorough screening, behavioral assessments, and alignment with organizational values, which reduces the likelihood of early attrition and subsequent recruitment cycles. When organizations focus on selecting candidates who are inherently motivated, culturally compatible, and possess critical skills, they can reduce the dependency on extensive training to correct initial mismatches.

Conversely, relying on making up for bad selection with good training tends to be less effective in the long term. While training is vital for skill development and adapting employees to new roles, it cannot compensate for fundamental misalignment of candidates’ values, attitudes, and motivations. Employees hired without adequate screening may require excessive training, have lower engagement levels, and be more prone to turnover, which ultimately incurs higher costs and disrupts productivity.

To enhance retention, organizations employ various strategies that foster employee commitment and satisfaction. These strategies include competitive compensation and benefits packages, recognition and reward systems, opportunities for career advancement, and fostering a positive work environment. For instance, providing clear career pathways encourages employees to envision a future within the organization, thus increasing their loyalty and reducing turnover. Employee engagement initiatives such as regular feedback, participative decision-making, and promoting work-life balance also significantly contribute to retention.

Furthermore, organizations that prioritize professional development, mentorship programs, and work culture initiatives that emphasize inclusivity and respect tend to retain their top talent more effectively. The role of strong leadership in facilitating open communication, recognizing achievements, and addressing employee concerns promptly cannot be understated. These efforts create a sense of belonging and purpose among employees, encouraging them to remain committed to organizational goals.

In the context of global competition and escalating demands, HR managers are also tasked with continuously improving performance through strategic initiatives that align with organizational objectives. High-performance work systems, such as competency-based management, data-driven decision making, and innovative reward models, serve to motivate employees and encourage peak performance, which directly impacts retention and recruitment success.

In conclusion, recruitment and retention are two pivotal outcomes of human resource management that are deeply interconnected. Effective recruitment that emphasizes cultural fit and motivation reduces turnover and enhances long-term retention, which in turn sustains organizational performance. Prioritizing strategic hiring practices over reliance on extensive training to rectify poor selection results in more stable, engaged, and high-performing workforces. HR strategies focusing on employee satisfaction, development, and recognition are vital for maintaining a competitive edge in a globalized economy.

References

• Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2016). Strategy and human resource management. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cascio, W. F., & Boudreau, J. W. (2016). The search for global competence: HR and training market forces. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 236-245.
• Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management. Pearson Education.
• Kaufman, B. E. (2015). The evolving concept of strategic HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 25(4), 390-403.
• Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Johnson, D., Sandholtz, K., & Younger, J. (2012). HR competencies: Mastery at the intersection of people and business. Society for Human Resource Management.
• Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong's handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers.
• Snape, E., Redman, T., & Bamber, G. (2017). Managing employment relations. Routledge.
• Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (2011). Exploring human capital: putting 'human' back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93-104.
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
• Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. SAGE Publications.