Unit 2 Discussion Board: Throughout History Commerce

Unit 2 Discussion Board Assignmentthroughout History Commercial And E

Unit 2 Discussion Board Assignmentthroughout History Commercial And E

Throughout history, commercial and economic concerns have tremendously influenced the development of culture and politics in countries throughout the world. Analyze how cultural and political developments of the United States were similarly influenced by the listed economic and commercial concerns. Since America’s independence, vast differences have developed from region to region. Consider how the historical antebellum developments of the more urban and commercial North and the more rural and agricultural South led to differences in the culture, political parties, and ethnic and racial perspectives of the two regions and eventually gave way to the American Civil War.

Historians have long debated the causes of the American Civil War and have generally agreed these causes to be rooted in political, economic, and social differences. Use the following outline to format your response:

Paragraph 1: How did historical regional differences affect the development of political structures in the United States? What examples do you see in current times of how these events affected the U.S. development of culture and society?

Paragraph 2: Describe 2 fundamental reasons why the American Civil War occurred. Given the circumstances of the conflict, explain whether or not the war could (or should) have been avoided.

Paper For Above instruction

The influence of economic and commercial concerns on the development of political and cultural aspects of the United States is profound and multifaceted. Historically, regional differences rooted in economic foundations—primarily agriculture versus commerce—shaped the political structures and societal values that persisted through different eras. The antebellum period vividly exemplifies this, as the more urbanized, industrial North and the rural, agrarian South developed distinct identities that eventually led to the Civil War. These regional distinctions have continued to influence contemporary American culture and politics, illustrating their enduring significance.

During the early years following independence, the United States' geographical and economic variations contributed heavily to its political formation. The North’s rapid industrialization fostered a complex economy based on manufacturing, trade, and urban development. This economic environment led to policies favoring tariffs, internal improvements, and a strong centralized government to facilitate commerce. Conversely, the South’s economy, rooted heavily in plantation agriculture and slavery, promoted states’ rights and limited federal interference, emphasizing agriculture, land expansion, and minimal government regulation. These divergent priorities created deep political fissures, exemplified by the formation of different political parties, including the Whigs and Democrats, reflecting regional interests. Today, these historical divisions persist, seen in the differing political ideologies and economic priorities of northern and southern states, influencing debates on issues such as trade policies, social reforms, and federal authority.

The American Civil War’s core causes are often summarized as disagreements over economic interests, states’ rights, and the moral implications of slavery. Two fundamental reasons stand out. First, the economic divergence—industrial versus plantation economy—encouraged opposing views on tariffs, federal intervention, and economic policies. The North favored tariffs to protect burgeoning industries, while the South opposed them, fearing economic disadvantages for its export-dependent agriculture. Second, slavery emerged as a moral and economic institution central to the Southern economy, creating irreconcilable differences with the abolitionist movement growing in the North. These conflicting interests made compromise increasingly difficult, ultimately leading to war.

Whether the Civil War could or should have been avoided remains debated among historians. Some argue that more effective political compromises, such as modifications to the Missouri Compromise or the Kansas-Nebraska Act, might have delayed conflict. Others contend that fundamental moral issues, particularly slavery, rendered conflict inevitable, as both sides saw the survival of their economic and social systems at stake. The rising sectional tensions and failure of early compromises make it clear that, while some limited resolutions might have postponed conflict, the fundamental differences were too entrenched to avoid a violent confrontation entirely.

In conclusion, regional economic differences profoundly shaped the political and cultural landscape of the United States from its founding through the Civil War to modern times. The North and South’s contrasting economic bases led to divergent political ideologies, social structures, and moral perspectives, ultimately resulting in the Civil War. Understanding these historical roots is essential in comprehending contemporary American politics and societal divisions, illustrating how economic concerns continue to influence cultural development.

References

  • Baker, R., & Glasson, J. (2005). American Civil War: Causes, Consequences, and Legacy. Oxford University Press.
  • Foner, E. (2010). The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • McPherson, J. M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press.
  • Rable, G. C. (2010). Samuel B. Morse, the Civil War, and the Ironies of History. University of Georgia Press.
  • Stevens, B. (2012). The Causes of the Civil War. HarperCollins.
  • McCullough, D. (2005). 1776. Simon & Schuster.
  • Holt, M. F. (1993). The Political Crisis of the 1850s. University of Chicago Press.
  • Wilentz, S. (2012). The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • McKison, M. (2013). Regionalism and American Political Culture. Routledge.
  • Neely, M. E. Jr. (2010). The Union Divided: Civil War Literature. Harvard University Press.