Use The Internet To Research Criminal Proceedings In 364083

Use The Internet To Research Criminal Proceedings In One 1 Of The Si

Use the Internet to research criminal proceedings in one of the six model countries from the textbook. Imagine you are traveling abroad in your chosen country when you witness a local national committing a violent assault. The criminal is arrested and charged by the police. Upon returning to the United States, a professor in one of your criminal justice classes asks you to complete a written report on your experience. Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you: Determine the pertinent demographic, social, political, and economic factors about your chosen country. Examine the manner in which your chosen country’s criminal code would likely view the crime you witnessed. Provide a rationale for the response. Choose two (2) individual rights that the United States grants criminal suspects, such as search and seizure, right to counsel, etc., and analyze the country’s perspective on each right. Provide support for the analysis. Investigate the manner in which the police in your chosen country would likely treat the defendant. Provide justification for the response. Classify the fundamental similarities and differences between the police culture in your chosen country compared to the United States. Use at least four (4) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different from other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are: Compare and contrast American perspectives on criminal law with those of other countries. Evaluate the nature of comparative policing and global law enforcement cooperation. Analyze the role of procedural law in the four (4) major legal traditions. Use technology and information resources to research comparative perspectives in criminal justice. Write clearly and concisely about criminal justice topics using proper writing mechanics and SWS style conventions.

Paper For Above instruction

In this paper, I will explore the criminal proceedings of Japan, one of the six model countries from the textbook, to compare and contrast its legal system with that of the United States, based on a hypothetical scenario where I witness a violent assault abroad. I will examine key demographic, social, political, and economic factors in Japan, analyze how its criminal justice system perceives such a crime, evaluate the country’s stance on individual rights comparable to those in the U.S., and discuss police treatment and police culture differences and similarities.

Demographic, Social, Political, and Economic Factors in Japan

Japan is a highly developed East Asian nation characterized by a homogeneous population, with over 125 million inhabitants. Its demographic profile indicates an aging population, with a high life expectancy and low birth rates (Statistics Bureau of Japan, 2022). Socioeconomically, Japan has a robust economy driven by advanced technology, manufacturing, and export-oriented industries, resulting in high standards of living (Bank of Japan, 2023). Politically, Japan operates as a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary government, emphasizing stability, rule of law, and social order (Cabinet Office Japan, 2022). These demographic and economic factors influence the Japanese criminal justice system’s emphasis on social harmony and community-based policing approaches.

Japanese Criminal Code and View of the Crime

If witnessing a violent assault in Japan, the criminal code would likely categorize it as a serious offense, such as assault or homicide, depending on the severity. The Japanese criminal justice system emphasizes the importance of social order and the protection of citizens’ safety (Kelley & Eccles, 2017). The legal response would involve prompt police intervention following an incident report. The system prioritizes rehabilitation over punishment, and crimes are prosecuted in a manner consistent with maintaining societal harmony. The rationale is rooted in Japan’s legal tradition, influenced by Confucian values emphasizing community cohesion and social responsibility (Ishizaki, 2016).

Comparison of Individual Rights: Search and Seizure and Right to Counsel

In the United States, criminal suspects are protected by constitutional rights, notably the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures and the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of the right to counsel (U.S. Constitution, Amendments IV and VI). In Japan, the approach to these rights differs. While police need a suspect’s cooperation and can conduct searches with a warrant based on probable cause, the legal standards are somewhat more restrictive, and suspects’ rights are less emphasized in practice (Killinger, 2014). The right to counsel exists in Japan, but the process involves police-led interrogations that can be prolonged and sometimes coercive, raising concerns about coerced confessions, which are still admissible in court unless proven obtained unlawfully (Chiba & McConnell, 2016). The Japanese system tends to prioritize efficient investigations over suspect protections, contrasting with the U.S.’s emphasis on constitutional safeguards.

Police Treatment of the Defendant

In Japan, police are trained to conduct investigations professionally, with a focus on maintaining social harmony. Interrogations often occur without a lawyer present, and suspects may face extensive questioning, sometimes lasting days, which has drawn criticism internationally for potential coercion (Kelley & Eccles, 2017). The Japanese police culture emphasizes hierarchical discipline and respect for authority, with less focus on adversarial interactions than in the U.S. This approach aims to secure confessions efficiently but raises human rights concerns regarding coercion and fair treatment.

Comparison of Police Culture in Japan and the U.S.

The police culture in Japan is characterized by a commitment to social order, hierarchy, and community service, often manifested in community policing initiatives and collaborative relationships with local citizens (Fukurai, 2018). Conversely, U.S. police culture tends to emphasize individual rights, procedural justice, and a more adversarial relationship with suspects. The American police often operate within a militarized framework, focused on enforcing laws strictly and addressing crime through a law-and-order perspective (Gaines & Miller, 2019). While both countries value police professionalism, the core cultural orientations diverge significantly, with Japan emphasizing social harmony and collective responsibility, and the U.S. emphasizing individual rights and procedural fairness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Japan’s criminal justice system reflects its unique social, cultural, and legal traditions, which prioritize social harmony and community well-being. Its approach to criminal proceedings, police treatment, and rights, while similar in some procedural aspects, differs markedly in the protections afforded suspects and the police's cultural ethos. Understanding these differences enhances cross-national perspectives in criminal justice and offers insights into developing more effective, culturally sensitive law enforcement strategies globally.

References

• Bank of Japan. (2023). Financial and Economic Data. https://www.boj.or.jp/en/statistics/
• Cabinet Office Japan. (2022). Annual Report on the Japanese Government's Policies. https://www.cao.go.jp/
• Chiba, R., & McConnell, D. (2016). Coerced Confessions in Japan: An International Perspective. Journal of Japanese Law, 45, 123-145.
• Fukurai, H. (2018). Community Policing in Japan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 133–148.
• Gaines, L. K., & Miller, R. L. (2019). Criminal Justice in Action. Cengage Learning.
• Ishizaki, A. (2016). Social Harmony and Legal Traditions in Japan. Japan Law Review, 62, 45–68.
• Kelley, J., & Eccles, J. (2017). Crime and Justice in Japan. Oxford University Press.
• Killinger, J. (2014). The Japanese Legal System. Routledge.
• Statistics Bureau of Japan. (2022). Demographic Data. https://www.stat.go.jp/english/index.html
• U.S. Constitution. Amendments IV and VI.