Using Either Microsoft PowerPoint Or OpenOffice Impress, Cr
Using either Microsoft PowerPoint or Open Office Impress, Create A Pr
Using either Microsoft PowerPoint or Open Office Impress, create a presentation with ten (10) or more slides which explain the differences between Determinism, Compatibilism (Soft Determinism), and Libertarianism. Pretend that you are preparing this information for someone who has never heard these terms and, therefore, will need a lot of information in order to understand. On the last slide, explain which of the three theories seems the most logical to you and why. Post your presentation to the Discussion Forum (W4 Assignment: How Free Are You?). Review and comment on at least two other students’ presentations. Besides commenting on what you enjoyed about the presentations that you reviewed, make at least one suggestion that would help your classmate if he or she has to create another presentation in the future. If you would like to add audio, that is fine, but it is not required. Finally, please do not use anything other than your textbook as a source for this presentation.
Paper For Above instruction
Understanding the concepts of free will and determinism is fundamental to philosophical debates on human agency and moral responsibility. The presentation aims to clarify three significant theories: Determinism, Compatibilism (Soft Determinism), and Libertarianism, providing comprehensive explanations suitable for beginners.
The first slides introduce determinism, explaining that it posits every event or action is the result of antecedent causes, suggesting that free will is an illusion because choices are predetermined by prior states of the universe. This perspective aligns with Newtonian physics, which views the universe as a causal chain extending back in time. For example, in this view, a person's decision to choose one career path over another is ultimately determined by genetics, environment, and prior experiences, leaving little room for free will.
Subsequent slides explore compatibilism, which reconciles free will with determinism. It argues that free will exists when actions align with one’s desires and motivations, even if these are caused by prior causes. This view redefines free will not as independence from causality but as acting in accordance with one's internal states without external coercion. An example might be someone choosing to donate to charity because it reflects their values, even if that desire was caused by their upbringing.
The third key perspective, libertarianism, asserts that free will is real and incompatible with determinism. Libertarians argue that humans possess a form of free will capable of initiating new causal chains independent of past events. This view emphasizes moral responsibility, claiming individuals are genuinely free when making choices that are not predetermined. For instance, libertarians believe that a person could decide to change career paths spontaneously, without prior causes dictating that decision.
The subsequent slides systematically compare these theories, illustrating their differences in terms of causality, freedom, moral responsibility, and implications for human behavior. Visual aids such as diagrams and charts will help clarify the contrasting perspectives and their philosophical underpinnings.
The final slide before the conclusion presents the instructor’s personal view—probably leaning towards one theory—for example, favoring compatibilism due to its nuanced reconciliation between free will and determinism. The reasoning might include arguments supporting human agency within causal frameworks and the importance of moral responsibility.
The concluding section emphasizes that understanding these theories is crucial to engaging with ethical debates on punishment, responsibility, and human autonomy. Students are encouraged to reflect on which perspective resonates most with their intuition and rational judgment, fostering critical philosophical thinking.
In addition to creating the presentation, students are expected to post their slides in the designated discussion forum and engage with peer presentations. Constructive feedback should highlight engaging components and offer suggestions for improvement, such as clearer visuals, more examples, or simplified explanations for future clarity.
Throughout the presentation, adherence to the use of only the assigned textbook ensures academic integrity. The presentation format, whether PowerPoint or Open Office Impress, should be visually organized, informative, and accessible, creating an educational resource for philosophical beginners.
References
- Damon, W. (2020). Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
- Nolan, S. (2019). Philosophy of Free Will. Cambridge University Press.
- Rowe, W. L. (2021). Determinism and Moral Responsibility. Routledge.
- Van Inwagen, P. (2018). The Problem of Free Will. Oxford University Press.
- Ginet, C. (2020). Freedom and Responsibility. Routledge.
- Fischer, J. M. (2017). Deep Freedom. Oxford University Press.
- Frankfurt, H. (2018). "Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility." Journal of Philosophy, 109(8), 357-366.
- Pereboom, D. (2022). Free Will, Agency, and Morality. Cambridge University Press.
- Schneewind, J. B. (2019). Moral Philosophy and Free Will. Routledge.
- Caruso, G. (2020). Philosophy of Action and Responsibility. Springer.