Using The Project You Selected To Develop A WBS And WBSD

Using The Project One Of You Selecte Develop A Wbs Wbsd With Tangib

Using the project one of you selecte ; Develop a WBS, WBSD with Tangible Outcomes (No verbs/activities), a Traceability Matrix, Success Criteria/Quality Standards (Note: remember that processes, activities and milestones belong in the schedule…not the WBS) NOTE: Format: Double line spacing between paragraphs but 1.5 spacing within the paragraph, 11-point Times Roman, 1-inch margins. Please use footnotes or end-notes and citations as well as 12-14 point font, bold headings and subheadings.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the realm of project management, the development of comprehensive work breakdown structures (WBS), work breakdown structures with deliverables (WBSD), traceability matrices, and defined success criteria is essential for ensuring project clarity, accountability, and successful delivery. This paper presents a detailed development based on a selected project, focusing on creating a WBS and WBSD that highlight tangible outcomes, along with establishing a traceability matrix and defining success standards. These components are instrumental in aligning stakeholders, managing scope, and monitoring project progress effectively.

Selected Project Overview

For this analysis, a hypothetical project titled "Implementation of a Corporate Employee Training Program" has been selected. The project aims to design, develop, and execute a comprehensive training initiative within a corporation to enhance employee skills and organizational effectiveness. The scope includes curriculum development, training delivery, evaluation, and follow-up activities. The project’s primary outputs are tangible outcomes such as trained employees, training materials, and assessment reports.

Development of the WBS

The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) is a hierarchical decomposition of the project scope into manageable sections. It encapsulates all deliverables without including specific activities or processes. For the training program, the WBS items are:

• 1.0 Project Management
• 2.0 Curriculum Design and Development
• 3.0 Training Material Production
• 4.0 Training Delivery
• 5.0 Evaluation and Feedback
• 6.0 Follow-up and Reporting

Each item represents a key deliverable, aligning with the principles of a WBS that emphasizes outputs rather than actions.

Development of the WBSD with Tangible Outcomes

The WBSD extends the WBS by explicitly listing tangible outcomes linked to each deliverable, avoiding verbs related to activities or processes:

• 1.0 Project Management
• Project charter approval document
• Approval of project plan
• 2.0 Curriculum Design and Development
• Approved training curriculum document
• 3.0 Training Material Production
• Completed training manuals and handouts
• 4.0 Training Delivery
• Number of completed training sessions
• Trained employee list
• 5.0 Evaluation and Feedback
• Training evaluation reports
• Feedback summaries
• 6.0 Follow-up and Reporting
• Final project report
• Follow-up plan document

This structure clearly defines the measurable outcomes, aiding in project traceability and assessment.

Traceability Matrix

The traceability matrix links project requirements to WBS components and outcomes, ensuring accountability and clear mappings:

The matrix facilitates tracking of each requirement from initiation to completion, ensuring all deliverables align with project goals.

Success Criteria and Quality Standards

Defining clear success criteria and quality standards is vital for assessing project outcomes. For this project, success criteria include:

• 100% of scheduled training sessions conducted within planned timeline
• At least 95% participant satisfaction as per feedback surveys
• Achievement of predetermined learning objectives, evidenced by post-training assessments exceeding 80% pass rate
• Completion of all deliverables within the approved budget
• Final project report approved by stakeholders

Quality standards are established to ensure deliverables meet professional and organizational expectations:

• Curriculum and training materials adhere to industry best practices and organizational standards
• Training sessions are delivered by certified instructors with a minimum of 5 years' experience
• Evaluation reports follow a standardized format ensuring consistency and comparability
• All documentation is approved by project sponsors and stakeholders

These criteria and standards serve as benchmarks for project success, guiding monitoring and evaluation processes.

Conclusion

Effective project management necessitates meticulous planning through components like WBS, WBSD, traceability matrices, and defined success criteria. This structured approach ensures tangible outcomes are clearly identified, progress is traceable, and standards are maintained. Applying these tools to the selected training program project demonstrates how project deliverables can be managed to meet organizational goals successfully. Future projects can leverage this framework to enhance clarity, accountability, and quality assurance throughout the project lifecycle.

References

1. PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
2. Phillips, J. J., & Gully, S. M. (2019). Strategic Training and Development. Pearson.
3. Kerzner, H. (2018). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
4. Snyder, C. S. (2020). Project Management Communications: A Guide for Project Managers. Routledge.
5. Schwalbe, K. (2018). Information Technology Project Management. Cengage Learning.
6. Boehm, B. W. (1988). A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 11(4), 14-24.
7. Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2017). Project Management: The Managerial Process. McGraw-Hill Education.
8. Martinsuo, M. (2013). From micro to macro: A systems view on project portfolio management. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 830-841.
9. Hirano, S. (1991). Kaizen or Continuous Improvement. Productivity Press.
10. Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme. Wiley.