Using The Results Of Your Week Two Project Attach

Using The Results Of Your Work From Week Two Project Attachedidentif

Using the results of your work from week two project (attached) Identify Overall Scope/ Analysis of Unexpected Results ; two additional events will be introduced. You will again analyze the impact of these events to the final project. In a 2-3 page Word document, discuss your analysis on the following events: It is discovered the refrigerated module is too large for the designed refrigerated backpack pouch. What is your course of action? The subcontractor assigned to build the radio module for the backpack has shut down. What is your course of action? In your analysis, you should discuss four areas affected by these unexpected events. Three of the areas of the project affected by the events should include changes to budget, human capital, and impact to schedule, and identify one additional area affected by these events.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The success of a project heavily relies on proactive planning, adaptability, and effective management of unforeseen circumstances (Kerzner, 2017). When unexpected events occur, they pose significant challenges that can disrupt the scope, schedule, budget, and resources of a project (PMI, 2021). In this analysis, I examine two critical unexpected events encountered in the project related to the development of a refrigerated backpack: the oversized refrigerated module and the shutdown of the subcontractor responsible for building the radio module. I will assess the impact of these events on four areas: budget, human capital, schedule, and procurement strategy, and propose appropriate courses of action to mitigate their effects.

Event 1: The Refrigerated Module Is Too Large for the Backpack Pouch

The discovery that the refrigerated module exceeds the designed space of the backpack pouch represents a significant challenge. Immediate steps involve revisiting the design specifications and engaging with the engineering team to explore potential solutions such as redesign of the pouch or selecting a smaller module (Lewis & Hamilton, 2018). This situation may lead to increased costs due to redesign efforts and manufacturing adjustments.

Impact on Budget: Additional expenses are anticipated due to redesign, prototype development, and possible procurement of a smaller or custom-built module. Budget revisions are necessary to allocate funds for these modifications (Project Management Institute, 2011).

Impact on Human Capital: The engineering and design teams will need to allocate extra resources to solve spatial issues, which could delay other tasks. If the redesign is substantial, additional hiring or consulting with specialists may be warranted (Milosevic, 2015).

Impact on Schedule: The redesign process could extend the development timeline, delaying the project’s overall completion. Time buffers or schedule adjustments will be needed to accommodate re-engineering activities (PMI, 2021).

Additional Area — Quality Control: Ensuring the revised design maintains the required functionality and safety standards is critical. Additional testing and quality assurance measures will be necessary to verify the new configurations meet all specifications (ISO, 2018).

Event 2: The Subcontractor Building the Radio Module Has Shut Down

The shutdown of the subcontractor responsible for the radio module affects procurement, potentially leading to delays in component availability and subsequent delays in integrating the module into the final product. Immediate actions include identifying alternative suppliers or subcontractors, possibly negotiating expedited contracts (Kerzner, 2017).

Impact on Budget: Switching suppliers or subcontractors may incur higher costs due to expedited shipping, higher unit prices for smaller or custom orders, or renegotiation fees. Contingency funds allocated for procurement risks become essential (PMI, 2021).

Impact on Human Capital: Additional effort will be required by procurement and project management teams to identify and vet new vendors, as well as adjust procurement schedules (Milosevic, 2015).

Impact on Schedule: Replacement of the subcontractor may cause delays in the production timeline. The impact hinges on the availability of alternative suppliers and the time needed for onboarding (Lewis & Hamilton, 2018).

Additional Area — Risk Management: The shutdown highlights the importance of having a robust risk mitigation plan, including diversified supplier bases or backup vendors to prevent project delays (ISO, 2018).

Conclusion

Both unexpected events—the oversized refrigerated module and the subcontractor shutdown—pose substantial risks to the project's budget, human resources, schedule, and procurement strategy. Effective responses involve revisiting project plans, engaging stakeholders, and implementing contingency measures. By addressing these issues proactively, project managers can minimize adverse impacts and realign project objectives with current realities (Kerzner, 2017; PMI, 2021). Recognizing the interconnectedness of project areas ensures comprehensive risk mitigation and sustained progress toward project goals.

References

• ISO. (2018). ISO 9001:2015 Quality Management Systems — Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
• Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley.
• Lewis, J., & Hamilton, R. (2018). Managing the Unexpected: Resolving Problems in the Projects. Routledge.
• Milosevic, D. (2015). Project Management Tools and Techniques. John Wiley & Sons.
• PMI. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.