Using The Textbook Daft Richard L. Marcic Dorothy 2013 Under
Using The Textbookdaft Richard L Marcic Dorothy2013understan
Using the textbook: Daft, Richard L. & Marcic, Dorothy. (2013). Understanding Management (8th ed.) Mason, OH: South-Western-Cengage Learning. pg Case of Critical Analysis Reflex Systems Questions: 1. What personality and behavior characteristics does Henry Rankin exhibit? Do you think these trait contribute to a good person job fit for him? If you were an executive coach hire to help Ranking be a better manager, what would you say to him? Why? 2. Doe Rankin display type A or type B behavior? What are the cause of stress for his team? 3. If you were Rankin, how would you have handled your team members (Sally Phillips, Bob Finley, and Lynne Johnston)? Be specific. What insights or behaviors would make Rankin a better manager?
Paper For Above instruction
Introduction
Effective management hinges on understanding individual personality traits and behavioral characteristics, which influence leadership styles and team dynamics. The case of Henry Rankin, as presented in Daft and Marcic’s "Understanding Management" (2013), offers a compelling example to explore how personal attributes impact managerial effectiveness. This paper critically examines Rankin's personality and behaviors, assesses his stress levels in relation to Type A or Type B behavior patterns, and proposes strategic approaches for enhancing his leadership capabilities. By analyzing these aspects, the goal is to provide actionable insights that can help Rankin foster a more productive and harmonious work environment.
Personality and Behavioral Characteristics of Henry Rankin
Henry Rankin exhibits a set of personality characteristics that include competitiveness, impatience, and a sense of urgency, which are typical in high-pressure managerial roles. He appears highly driven, often focused on results to the exclusion of process and team well-being. This drive correlates with traits such as assertiveness and a tendency toward controlling behavior, which are common in effective leaders but can also lead to managerial pitfalls if not balanced with empathy and delegation.
According to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and other personality assessments discussed in Daft and Marcic (2013), such traits could indicate a preference for extraversion and a thinking style, emphasizing objective decision-making. These characteristics can motivate teams by setting high standards; however, they also risk creating a domineering environment that suppresses team autonomy and morale.
In terms of behavioral contribution to job fit, Rankin's assertiveness and focus on results seem well aligned with roles demanding high achievement. However, his potential impatience and controlling tendencies may hinder his ability to foster collaboration and innovation, essential components of modern management.
If I were an executive coach advising Rankin, I would focus on moderating these traits to enhance his leadership effectiveness. I would suggest developing active listening skills, practicing patience, and promoting participative decision-making. Emphasizing emotional intelligence—recognizing and managing both his own emotions and those of his team—would be crucial in improving his overall managerial capacity (Goleman, 1990). I would also recommend stress management techniques to help him maintain composure under pressure, thus setting a positive example for his team.
Type A or Type B Behavior and Causes of Stress
Based on observations, Rankin appears predominantly Type A in behavior—competitive, highly organized, time-conscious, and often impatient. These traits, as discussed in Daft and Marcic (2013), are associated with a greater susceptibility to stress-related health issues, both in himself and his team members.
The causes of stress within Rankin's team stem primarily from his high-pressure approach and relentless pursuit of performance. Team members like Sally Phillips, Bob Finley, and Lynne Johnston likely experience stress due to inconsistent communication, unyielding deadlines, and lack of recognition for their efforts. For example, Sally Phillips might feel undervalued or ignored if Rankin prioritizes results over personal acknowledgment. Bob Finley's stress could be exacerbated by unclear expectations, while Lynne Johnston might feel overwhelmed by the constant push for perfection.
Research indicates that such environments can lead to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and higher turnover rates (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). Thus, Rankin's managerial style, if unchanged, risks damaging team cohesion and productivity over time.
Strategies for Handling Team Members and Enhancing Leadership
If I were in Rankin’s position, I would implement specific strategies to improve team management and reduce stress. For Sally Phillips, I would ensure clear communication of expectations and provide regular feedback to reinforce her contributions. Recognizing her achievements publicly would boost her morale and motivation, fostering loyalty and engagement.
For Bob Finley, I would clarify project objectives and subordinate roles, creating a structured environment that alleviates ambiguity-induced stress. Offering coaching or mentoring could help him develop confidence and skills, thereby improving his performance and reducing anxiety.
Lynne Johnston would benefit from workload assessments and prioritization help, ensuring she does not feel overwhelmed. Encouraging open dialogue about her challenges and providing resources for stress management would promote well-being.
To be a better manager, Rankin should cultivate emotional intelligence—particularly empathy and self-awareness. Mindfulness practices can help him become more attuned to his own stress and reactions, enabling him to act more thoughtfully. Delegating effectively and fostering a participative leadership style would also empower his team, promote professional growth, and improve overall team dynamics (Goleman, 1995).
Furthermore, introducing stress-reduction initiatives such as team-building activities, flexible working arrangements, and recognizing employee achievements can create a healthier work environment. Regular performance reviews focusing not only on results but also on personal development would encourage a balanced perspective on success.
Conclusion
Understanding the personality and behavioral traits of managers like Henry Rankin is essential for optimizing leadership effectiveness and team performance. Recognizing his tendencies toward Type A behavior and addressing associated stressors can lead to more sustainable management practices. By implementing targeted communication, recognition, delegation, and emotional intelligence strategies, Rankin can transform his managerial style to become more empathetic, adaptive, and resilient. Such improvements are critical for fostering a productive, motivated, and healthy organizational culture, ultimately enhancing both individual and collective success.
References
- Daft, R. L., & Marcic, D. (2013). Understanding Management (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western-Cengage Learning.
- Goleman, D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
- Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, burnout, and work engagement: A new perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293-315.
- Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). The emotional intelligence of leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2), 127-135.
- Liu, W., & Wang, J. (2019). Managing stress in organizations: The role of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(4), 480–492.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 104, 95-108.
- Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1999). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211.
- Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redefining work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(1), 13-26.
- Hasson, B., & Keenoy, T. (2018). Managing workplace stress: Reducing the burden of burnout. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1017-1038.