UTPB School Of Nursing NURS 4310: Social Determinants Of Hea

Utpb School Of Nursingnurs 4310 Social Determinants Of Healthselecte

Utpb School Of Nursingnurs 4310 Social Determinants Of Healthselecte

UTPB School of Nursing NURS 4310-Social Determinants of Health Selected Topics Guidelines Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide the student an opportunity to select one of the five domains within social determinants of health and evaluate the collaborative efforts put forth by various workgroups toward specific objectives within the selected domain. The student will also identify if any health policies have helped or hindered their efforts. Course Objectives This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes: · Describe the five domains of social determinants of health · Analyze the impact of social determinants of health on health disparities, inequalities, and health related outcomes · Examine the effects of health policies on global health outcomes · Formulate strategies to promote effective collaborations across professions to enhance healthcare access Module Objectives This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following module objectives: · Describe the SDoH workgroup objectives · Identify lead federal agencies that assist in addressing SDoH Due Date Submit your completed paper by the end of Week 7.

Requirements 1. This assignment is worth 100 points and will be graded on the quality of writing, the use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 2. Create your essay using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”). 3. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your essay may be posted under the Q&A Forum. 4. The length of the reflection is to be no less than 750 words and no greater than 1000 words, excluding the title and reference pages. 5. APA format is required with both a title page and a reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered): a. Introduction b. SDoH Domain including objectives c. SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain d. Are there any Policies that help or hinder progress? e. Conclusion Directions and Grading Criteria Category Points % Description Introduction Introduces the purpose of the paper in a concise, well written manner. SDoH Domain including objectives Provides detailed description of the chosen SDoH Domain including objectives. Be sure to use examples from selected readings, threaded discussions, and/or applications to support your assertions. SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain SDoH Workgroup objectives evaluated in detail; student explains how the workgroup is making an impact toward the domain. Policy Identifies and describes any health related policies that help or hinder the workgroup’s progress. If no policies are discovered, identifies potential policies that could help. Conclusion An effective conclusion identifies the main ideas and major conclusions from the body of your essay. Minor details are left out. Clarity of writing Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers. APA format All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the manuscript and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format: 1. Document setup 2. Title and reference pages Citations in the text and references Total: A quality essay will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Introduction 5 points Short introduction of selected SDoH domain. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed. 4–5 points Basic understanding and/or limited use of original explanation and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area. 2–3 points Little or very general introduction of selected SDoH. Little to no original explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area. 0–1 points SDoH Domain including objectives 20 points Excellent description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Current data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not. 15–20 points Basic description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Some data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not. 8–14 points Little or very general description of the selected SDoH domain and objectives. Little to no data is included describing whether objectives are being met or not. 0–7 points SDoH Workgroup objectives that apply to chosen domain 25 points SDoH workgroup objectives evaluated in detail; student explains how the workgroup is making an impact toward the domain.. 16-25 points SDoH workgroup objectives evaluated but lacks detail; impact is not addressed. 8-15points SDoH workgroup objectives not evaluated; Little or very general description of impact is addressed. 0–7 points Policy 25 points Identifies and describes any health related policies that help or hinder the workgroup’s progress. If no policies are discovered, identifies potential policies that could help. 16–25 points Student identifies policies but lacks description. 8–15 points Little or very general description of policies or does not provide potential policies. 0–7 points Conclusion 5 points Excellent understanding of selected SDoH domain, objectives, and workgroup effectivess. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed. 4–5 points Conclusion is included; lacks support and not fully developed. 2–3 points Little to no original explanation. 0–1 point Clarity of writing 10 points Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning. 8–10 points Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts. 5–7 points Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts. 0–4 points APA format 10 points APA format correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors. 8-10 points 3–5 errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations are missing. 5–7 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 0–4 points Total Points Possible = 100 points NURS 4310 Selected Topics Guidelines.docx MG 8/6/

Paper For Above instruction

The social determinants of health (SDoH) encompass a broad range of factors that influence individual and community health outside of direct medical care. Among the five domains of SDoH—economic stability, education access and quality, health and healthcare, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community context—the domain of economic stability is particularly influential in shaping health outcomes through access to resources, employment, housing stability, and financial security (Healthy People 2020, 2020). This paper aims to explore the objectives and impacts of initiatives within the economic stability domain, evaluate the collaborative efforts by various workgroups, and analyze how health policies facilitate or hinder progress in addressing economic disparities impacting health.

Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of economic stability, one of the five crucial domains of social determinants of health, in shaping health outcomes and reducing health disparities. It critically evaluates collaborative efforts by federal workgroups aimed at improving economic conditions that influence health and reviews the policies that support or obstruct these initiatives. Understanding these dynamics is essential for developing strategies that promote health equity and improve population health.

SDoH Domain Including Objectives

The economic stability domain addresses several core objectives: ensuring employment opportunities, improving financial literacy, increasing access to affordable housing, and providing food security (Healthy People 2020, 2020). The aim is to reduce economic barriers that prevent vulnerable populations from achieving optimal health. Current data reveals persistent disparities; for instance, unemployment rates and poverty levels remain significantly higher among minority and low-income populations, which correlates with poorer health outcomes in these groups (Bachhuber et al., 2021). The objectives set by federal agencies focus on policies and programs that promote economic inclusion, such as expanding minimum wages and housing assistance, but progress remains uneven.

SDoH Workgroup Objectives That Apply to Chosen Domain

The federal workgroups addressing social determinants of health, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), have specific objectives aligned with economic stability. For example, HRSA’s focus on expanding access to healthcare services for low-income populations indirectly influences economic stability by reducing healthcare costs and enabling workforce participation (HRSA, 2022). Similarly, the CMS initiatives through Medicaid expansion aim to improve income security and access to essential services, which can alleviate financial burdens (CMS, 2022). These workgroups aim to foster collaboration between agencies, community organizations, and policymakers to advance economic stability, recognizing that economic security is foundational for health equity (Williams et al., 2020). Their efforts include developing integrated programs that address housing, employment, and healthcare, aiming for systemic change.

Are There Any Policies That Help or Hinder Progress?

Several policies directly impact the efforts toward economic stability. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has significantly improved healthcare access for low-income groups, facilitating better health outcomes and economic participation (Kennedy et al., 2019). However, policy gaps such as limited minimum wage laws and insufficient housing assistance hinder progress. Some state-level policies restrict access to social safety-net programs, and recent debates over work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP benefits threaten to weaken the safety net for vulnerable populations (Gordon & Riley, 2021). Conversely, legislation like the Fair Housing Act supports efforts by promoting equitable housing access, which is integral to economic stability. Future policy development should focus on increasing minimum wages, expanding affordable housing programs, and ensuring comprehensive support for income security to bolster health outcomes (Lansky & Johnson, 2020).

Conclusion

Addressing economic stability as a social determinant of health is critical for reducing disparities and promoting health equity. Federal workgroups are making strides through collaborative efforts that target economic barriers affecting health, yet policy gaps remain. Policies like the ACA support these initiatives, but limitations in wage laws and housing funding impede progress. Moving forward, comprehensive policy reforms emphasizing income security and affordable housing are needed to enhance health outcomes across vulnerable populations. An integrated, multisectoral approach remains essential for fostering economic stability and achieving health equity.

References

  • Bachhuber, M. A., Jia, H., Gahagan, J., & Semrad, T. (2021). Health disparities and social determinants of health among minority populations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(2), 245–261.
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). (2022). Medicaid expansion and its impact on health equity. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicaid-expansion-and-impact-health-equity
  • Gordon, N., & Riley, M. (2021). Policy barriers to social safety-net programs: Implications for vulnerable populations. Policy & Politics, 49(3), 471–488.
  • Healthy People 2020. (2020). Social determinants of health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-of-health
  • HRSA. (2022). Initiatives to expand healthcare access for underserved populations. Health Resources and Services Administration. https://www.hrsa.gov/topics/health-initiatives
  • Kennedy, K. M., Blanchard, J., & Telesia, M. (2019). The impact of the Affordable Care Act on healthcare disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 109(4), 557–560.
  • Lansky, D., & Johnson, P. (2020). Policy recommendations for improving economic conditions and health outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis, 16(4), 230–245.
  • Williams, D. R., Gonzalez, H. M., Neighbors, H., et al. (2020). Prevalence and distribution of major social determinants of health in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 110(4), 523–530.
  • Healthy People 2020. (2020). Social determinants of health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-of-health
  • Gordon, N., & Riley, M. (2021). Policy barriers to social safety-net programs: Implications for vulnerable populations. Policy & Politics, 49(3), 471–488.

Related Assignments