Valuation Approach For Net Assets - Total Assets Method

Sheet11assets Valuation Approach Net Assets Method Total Assets T

Sheet11assets Valuation Approach Net Assets Method Total Assets T

Sheet.Assets valuation approach : Net Assets method = Total Assets - Total liabilities. Net Assets per share = Net Assets / No. of outstanding shares. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V (in € million) 1 euro equals 1.13 United States Dollar as of 02.01.2022. The analysis includes data from multiple years, calculating total assets, total liabilities, and outstanding shares in USD to determine net assets and per-share values. Additionally, a hybrid valuation approach based on estimating intrinsic value is demonstrated through a detailed cash flow projection for Home Depot, which serves as an example for similar calculations for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

Paper For Above instruction

The valuation of companies is a fundamental component of financial analysis, investment decision-making, and corporate strategy. Various approaches serve different purposes, including asset-based methods, income-based methods, and hybrid approaches. This paper explores these valuation techniques, emphasizing the net assets approach and a detailed intrinsic valuation process through discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, exemplified with contemporary corporate data.

Net Assets Method for Company Valuation

The net assets method is a straightforward asset-based valuation technique that calculates a company's worth by subtracting total liabilities from total assets. This approach is particularly suitable for asset-intensive firms and serves as a baseline measure of a company's intrinsic value. In the case of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA), the data from multiple years demonstrate the calculation of total assets and liabilities in euros, converted to USD at a specified exchange rate (1.13 USD per euro). By computing the net assets for each year, analysts can gauge the company’s financial health and stability over time.

For example, the total assets of FCA over five years range from approximately $108.8 billion to $117.9 billion, while total liabilities vary from $53.4 billion to $81.3 billion. The resulting net assets, calculated as total assets minus total liabilities, provide a snapshot of the company's net worth. Dividing net assets by the number of outstanding shares yields the net assets per share, a useful indicator for assessing valuation relative to market prices or book values.

Limitations and Context of Net Assets Valuation

While simple and transparent, the net assets approach has limitations. It overlooks intangible assets such as brand value, intellectual property, and customer relationships, which can comprise substantial portions of modern corporations’ value, especially in technology and service sectors. Moreover, the approach assumes the book values of assets and liabilities are accurate and reflect market values, which may not always be realistic due to accounting policies, asset depreciation, or impairment issues.

Nonetheless, the net asset method remains valuable for liquidation scenarios, assessing net worth in distressed situations, or establishing a baseline for more complex valuation models. For FCA, considering the tangible assets provides insight into the company's physical and financial buffer, but to capture the full economic value, a hybrid or income approach would be necessary.

Intrinsic Valuation via Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Analysis

Beyond asset-based metrics, intrinsic valuation methods aim to estimate a company's true worth based on its expected future cash flows. The most prevalent technique here is the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach, which calculates present values of projected free cash flows (FCF) to the firm or equity. The process involves forecasting future cash flows, determining an appropriate discount rate (based on the weighted average cost of capital, or WACC), and estimating terminal value to account for cash flows beyond the explicit forecast period.

Using the example of Home Depot, the approach considers the most recent three years of cash from operations and capital expenditures, recognizing that negative free cash flows may occur. To estimate intrinsic value, analysts compute the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) based on historical or hypothetical data, then project FCF into the future. Discounting these projected cash flows at a chosen rate results in their present value, which, when summed with the terminal value, provides an estimate of the company's intrinsic value.

Application to Fiat Chrysler Automobiles

Applying similar methodology to FCA involves calculating projected future cash flows, discounting them, and estimating terminal value. For instance, assuming a steady growth rate derived from historical data or industry averages, one can project FCA's future free cash flows. The terminal value is typically calculated as a multiple of the year 5 FCF (often between 10-12 times), capturing the company's ongoing value beyond the explicit forecast period.

Suppose FCA's projected cash flows in 2023-2027 are estimated by applying a chosen growth rate. Discounting these cash flows at the company's WACC yields the present value of the company's future operations. Adding the cash and cash equivalents on hand provides the enterprise value, which can be divided by the outstanding shares to derive an intrinsic per-share value. For FCA, this calculation could approximate to a value around $140 per share, subject to assumptions about growth rate, discount rate, and terminal multiple.

Analysis and Implications

The combination of asset-based and income-based valuation techniques offers a comprehensive view of a company's worth. The net assets approach provides a conservative baseline, emphasizing tangible assets, while the DCF method captures future earnings potential, which is especially critical for companies in growth or innovation sectors. For FCA, integrating these approaches enables a nuanced understanding of market valuation versus intrinsic worth, informing investment and strategic decisions.

Additionally, sensitivity analysis around key assumptions—growth rates, discount rates, terminal multiples—is essential to understand valuation robustness. The use of multiple valuation methods aligns with best practices in financial analysis, providing cross-validation and a more reliable estimate of true company value.

Conclusion

Valuation is a multifaceted process that requires considering both tangible and intangible assets, as well as future earnings potential. The net assets method offers a straightforward, asset-based perspective appropriate in certain contexts, while discounted cash flow analysis provides insight into an organization's intrinsic value based on expected future cash flows. Applying these methods to FCA demonstrates their respective uses and limitations, underlining the importance of a balanced, multi-method approach in comprehensive financial valuation.

References

  • Berk, J., & DeMarzo, P. (2017). Corporate Finance. Pearson Higher Ed.
  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. Wiley Finance.
  • Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Penman, S. H. (2012). Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2016). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2016). Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning.
  • Damodaran, A. (2020). Narrative and Numbers: The Value of Stories in Capital Investment. Columbia Business School Publishing.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2012). Analysis for Financial Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
  • Shapiro, A. C. (2013). Multinational Financial Management. John Wiley & Sons.

Related Assignments