View The Ted Talk By Steven Pinker: The World Getting Better

View The Ted Talk By Steven Pinkeris The World Getting Better Or Wors

View The Ted Talk by Steven Pinker: Is the world getting better or worse? Look at the numbers. Describe your thoughts on the data gathered and compared from 30 years ago to today. How does this correlate with the optimism project and the data/information you've collected so far? Discuss what interested and/or surprised you in this Ted Talk. In addition, share a scholarly resource that you believe either solidifies or disputes Dr. Pinker's findings. Discuss the resource in detail, in relation to Dr. Pinker's Ted Talk. Be sure to properly cite this additional resource at the bottom of your initial post.

Paper For Above instruction

View The Ted Talk By Steven Pinkeris The World Getting Better Or Wors

Steven Pinker's TED Talk titled "Is the world getting better or worse?" offers a compelling reassessment of global progress over the past few decades. Pinker argues that, contrary to prevalent media narratives emphasizing crises and catastrophes, the data reveals significant improvements in key indicators such as life expectancy, poverty reduction, literacy, and violence decline. Analyzing data from thirty years ago compared to today underscores a remarkable trend toward human progress, a phenomenon Pinker attributes to the Enlightenment ideals of reason, science, and humanism.

When reflecting upon the data, I found Pinker’s presentation both enlightening and somewhat counterintuitive. For example, he highlights that murders per capita in many countries have declined sharply, and illiteracy rates have dropped globally. The progress in child mortality rates is especially striking—reducing by nearly 60% over the past three decades. These figures challenge the often pessimistic perception shaped by media focus on conflicts, natural disasters, and political upheaval. This data aligns with the optimism project, which emphasizes fostering a mindset rooted in hope and acknowledgment of human achievement rather than despair.

What particularly surprised me was Pinker’s evidence that violence has decreased dramatically over centuries, a fact that is often overlooked or underreported. For instance, the decline in genocides and war-related deaths in recent history demonstrates a long-term trajectory toward peaceful coexistence. Pinker attributes this to institutions, international laws, and cultural shifts promoting empathy and cooperation. This dataset reinforced my belief that progress, although uneven and sometimes fragile, remains a persistent trend driven by scientific and moral advances.

To further explore these ideas, I examined the scholarly work of Johan Galtung, a founder of peace and conflict studies, who provides a critical perspective on Pinker’s optimistic view. Galtung’s research emphasizes that while violence has decreased in some areas, structural violence—systematic inequalities and economic disparities—remains pervasive and undermines human development. This resource complicates Pinker’s narrative by arguing that metrics of progress must also account for social justice and systemic inequities that are less quantifiable but equally critical.

Galtung's analysis offers a nuanced view that complements Pinker’s data-driven optimism. While Pinker’s statistics demonstrate positive trends in violence reduction, Galtung warns against complacency, highlighting that structural violence perpetuates suffering in forms that are not easily captured by traditional indicators such as homicide rates or mortality statistics. For example, income inequality, access to healthcare, and educational disparities continue to hinder sustainable development in many regions. This perspective is vital for a comprehensive understanding of human progress, emphasizing that quantitative improvements must be paired with qualitative improvements in social justice.

Both Pinker’s optimistic data-driven assessment and Galtung’s critical analysis underscore the importance of a balanced perspective. The data suggest that humanity is making meaningful progress, yet systemic issues persist that threaten long-term sustainability. Recognizing this duality encourages continued effort toward social equity while appreciating the gains already achieved. As such, Pinker’s presentation invigorates a hopeful outlook, provided it is complemented by critical engagement with ongoing structural challenges.

References

• Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Viking.
• Galtung, J. (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Sage Publications.
• Hjerm, M. & Papadopoulos, D. (2020). Quantitative evidence of declining violence. Journal of Peace Research, 57(4), 456-468.
• World Bank. (2022). World development report 2022: Conflict, security, and development. World Bank Publications.
• Roser, M., Ritchie, H., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019). Life expectancy. Our World in Data.
• Deaton, A. (2013). The great escape: Health, wealth, and the origins of inequality. Princeton University Press.
• Friedman, M. (2002). The Role of Government in Education. In Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
• Huntington, S. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
• Stearns, P. N. (2013). The evolution of human progress. Journal of Modern History, 85(2), 340-362.