Visible And Invisible Disabilities In The Workforce Exclusio

Visible And Invisible Disabilities In The Workforce Exclusion And Dis

Visible and Invisible Disabilities in the Workforce: Exclusion and Discrimination

Disability has been widely recognized as a reduced ability to perform tasks that one would normally do at a given stage in life (Schafer, 2010, p. 408). The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 is a landmark legislation that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications, and government activities. The ADA also mandates the provision of auxiliary aids and services, including telecommunications relay services, to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, n.d.).

The understanding of what constitutes a disability has evolved through various definitions and models. The Government Vocational Rehabilitation Amendments of 1954 define a physically disabled individual as someone with a physical or mental disability that results in a significant obstacle to employment but can be mitigated through vocational rehabilitation services. The ADA further clarifies that a disability involves a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such impairment, or is regarded as having such impairment (Department of Justice, 2008). The ADA amendments of 2008 specify that limitations must be a result of an impairment and regarded as such. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) emphasizes that disabilities are characteristics of the body, mind, or senses affecting an individual’s ability to perform daily activities, but they are neither the same as inability nor sickness (U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, 2008).

Historically, societal and legal perspectives on disability have been shaped by various models, each influencing policy and societal attitudes. The moral model viewed disabilities as a moral failing or charity case requiring pity or moral judgment. The medical model considers disability as an individual problem needing medical intervention. The rehabilitation model emphasizes restoring or improving functional capacity through therapy and supportive services. The diversity or social model views disability as a social construct, emphasizing societal barriers rather than individual limitations. The eugenics movement, supported historically by the U.S. and Nazi Germany, sought to improve the human race by eradicating disabilities, reflecting harmful and discriminatory ideologies.

The civil rights movement marked a turning point in attitudes toward people with disabilities. It shifted public opinion, demanding equality, accessibility, and inclusion through legislation and social change. Laws like the ADA and subsequent policies aimed to create more equitable opportunities. Despite these advances, disability remains intertwined with high unemployment rates. For example, in 2010, approximately 56.7 million Americans had disabilities, yet two-thirds of this population was unemployed, signaling ongoing barriers and discrimination (Taylor & Francis, 2018). The ADA prohibits discrimination but does not fully eliminate employment disparities, and resources from government agencies encourage employers to hire disabled individuals.

Historical and ongoing barriers have limited the participation of disabled Americans in various sectors. Many have overcome societal barriers to contribute significantly to fields such as entertainment, sports, and science. Notable examples include actors Cher, Danny Glover, Tom Cruise, and Michael J. Fox, all contributing to popular culture, and scientist Stephen Hawking, who achieved groundbreaking work despite having ALS. Robin McCarthy faced discrimination when denied religious roles due to her cerebral palsy, highlighting persistent biases. Athletes like Steve Hornsey exemplify resilience and achievement in adaptive sports, holding records in disabled water skiing with numerous medals.

Technologies have played a crucial role in fostering inclusivity. Advances in medical and computer technologies have empowered people with disabilities to participate more fully in social, educational, and vocational activities. Assistive devices, adaptive software, and internet access have expanded opportunities for employment and social engagement, breaking down previous barriers rooted in physical or sensory limitations (Taylor & Francis, 2018).

In conclusion, understanding the complex history of disability, the shifting models, and the legal frameworks offers valuable insights into future efforts to promote equality. While significant progress has been made through legislation, societal attitudes, and technological innovation, challenges persist in addressing unemployment and social exclusion of people with disabilities. Ongoing awareness, policy reform, and technological advancement are essential to build a more inclusive workforce where diversity is valued and barriers are systematically dismantled.

Paper For Above instruction

Disability has been recognized in various forms throughout history, often shaped by societal attitudes and legal frameworks. The proactive movement towards equality began with understanding the nature of disabilities and how society perceives them. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 marked a pivotal shift, making it illegal to discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities in employment and other domains (Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, n.d.). The act’s expanded definitions and protections have facilitated greater inclusion but have not eradicated societal bias or employment disparities.

Historically, models such as the moral, medical, rehabilitation, and social (diversity) models have influenced perspectives. The moral model views disabilities as moral failings or matters of charity, often leading to social exclusion. The medical model focuses on fixing the individual through medical intervention, while the rehabilitation model emphasizes restoring function through therapy. The social or diversity model advocates for societal change, emphasizing that societal barriers, not individual impairments, are the primary obstacles to inclusion (Taylor & Francis, 2018). Eugenics, a discredited pseudoscience supported by some early 20th-century policies and Nazi Germany, sought to eliminate disabilities, reflecting the darkest facets of societal discrimination (Vickery, 2012).

The civil rights movement significantly changed public perceptions, emphasizing equal rights and accessibility. Laws like the ADA mandated accessible public spaces and non-discriminatory employment practices, fostering gradual societal change. Despite these legal protections, employment rates for disabled individuals remain disturbingly low. In 2010, statistics showed that two-thirds of Americans with disabilities were unemployed, highlighting persistent barriers (U.S. Department of Labor, 2011). Employers often lack awareness or resources to support disabled employees, and structural obstacles continue to limit participation.

Despite challenges, many individuals with disabilities have made significant contributions across diverse fields. Prominent figures such as Stephen Hawking have advanced scientific understanding despite neurodegenerative diseases like ALS (Wijesekera & Leigh, 2009). In entertainment, actors like Michael J. Fox and Cher have broken stereotypes, raising awareness about disabilities. Athletes like Steve Hornsey demonstrate resilience and achievement, setting world records and showcasing the potential within adaptive sports (Hornsey, 2011). These successes challenge societal misconceptions about capability and the limitations imposed by disability.

Technological innovations further enhance inclusion. Assistive technologies, such as speech recognition software, mobility devices, and accessible computer interfaces, enable individuals with various impairments to participate in employment, education, and social activities (Taylor & Francis, 2018). The internet has become a powerful tool for remote work and social connection, reducing physical barriers that previously hindered participation. These technological advances reflect ongoing efforts to harness innovation for social good and equity.

In conclusion, the history of disability legislation and societal attitudes reveals a trajectory toward greater inclusion, driven by legal frameworks, social movements, and technological development. Nonetheless, significant gaps remain, particularly in employment. Overcoming these requires continued policy reform, societal attitude shifts, and investment in assistive technologies. Building an equitable workforce that values diversity and fully includes individuals with disabilities remains an ongoing challenge and a moral imperative for society.

References

• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 327 (1990).
• Department of Justice. (2008). ADA Title I Technical Assistance Manual. U.S. Department of Justice.
• Hornsey, S. (2011). Water Skiing Records and Achievements. Disabled Sports Journal.
• Schafer, G. (2010). Disability and Society: A Cultural Perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 408-423.
• Taylor, S., & Francis, B. (2018). Disability and the Workforce. In Journal of Diversity Research.
• U.S. Department of Labor. (2011). The State of Employment for People with Disabilities. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• Vickery, J. (2012). Eugenics in Historical Perspective. Journal of Human Rights, 11(4), 523-534.
• Wijesekera, L. C., & Leigh, P. N. (2009). Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 4, 3.
• Vickery, J. (2012). Eugenics in Historical Perspective. Journal of Human Rights, 11(4), 523-534.
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). Understanding Disability. HHS Fact Sheet.