The Invisible Sponsor Backgrounds Some Executives Prefer To

The Invisible Sponsorbackgroundsome Executives Prefer To Micromanage P

The assignment involves analyzing the case of an executive reluctant to serve as a project sponsor, exploring the reasons behind such reluctance, the possibility of forcing an executive into the sponsorship role, and whether the sponsor should bear ultimate responsibility for project outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of project management, the role of a project sponsor is critical as it entails accountability for the success or failure of a project, as outlined in project governance frameworks (PMI, 2017). However, some executives show reluctance to act as sponsors due to various reasons. Primarily, they fear the potential negative impact on their reputation and career if the project fails, which often leads to avoidance of decision-making responsibilities associated with the sponsorship role (Beringer, Jonas, & Kock, 2013). This fear is compounded when executives lack familiarity with project management processes or perceive the role as high-risk, especially when their organizational reputation is tied to project outcomes (Winch, 2014). In the case study, Al Zink hesitated to make decisions to shield himself from possible failure repercussions, illustrating the risk aversion that inhibits executives from assuming sponsorship roles.

Regarding the question of whether an executive can be compelled to function as a project sponsor, organizational policies and leadership culture play significant roles. While formal authority can mandate an executive to undertake specific responsibilities, enforcement alone does not necessarily guarantee effective sponsorship. Coercing executives into sponsorship roles without addressing underlying fears or lack of competence may result in superficial engagement, undermining project success (Chinowsky & Taylor, 2016). In the case, the project manager Fred effectively pressured Al Zink into signing the schedule by emphasizing consequences, but such a forced approach may not lead to genuine commitment or effective sponsorship. Consequently, organizations should aim to motivate rather than coerce senior executives to assume sponsorship roles.

Finally, whether the sponsor should be ultimately responsible for project success or failure is a debated issue. The project sponsor is typically responsible for providing strategic direction, securing resources, and making key decisions (PMI, 2017). This responsibility aligns with the sponsor's position as the executive accountable for project outcomes. However, project success also depends on the collective effort of project teams, managers, and other stakeholders (Meredith & Mantel, 2017). Making the sponsor solely responsible simplifies accountability but might overlook the complex, collaborative nature of projects. In ethical terms, it is appropriate for the sponsor to bear ultimate responsibility, yet total blame or credit should recognize the integrated efforts of the entire project organization.

References

• Beringer, C., Jonas, J., & Kock, A. (2013). Inside project management: how organizational culture influences project success. International Journal of Project Management, 31(6), 912-925.
• Chinowsky, P., & Taylor, W. (2016). Managing project sponsors in complex environments. Project Management Journal, 47(4), 57-66.
• Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J. (2017). Project Management: A managerial approach (9th ed.). Wiley.
• PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
• Winch, G. (2014). Managing construction projects (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.