Watch The Films Gone Baby Gone And Sleepers Choose One Movie ✓ Solved

Watch The Films Gone Baby Gone And Sleepers Pick One Movie And Ap

Watch the films "Gone Baby Gone" and "Sleepers". Pick one movie and apply Kant's moral philosophy to judge the MAIN FINAL action. For “Gone Baby Gone,” judge Patrick’s final decision and for “Sleepers,” judge the priest’s final decision. Judging any other action in the movie is an automatic zero. 500 words minimum in MLA format. You must apply Kant's 3 premises for 50 points and Michael Sandel's 3 contrasts for 50 points.

Paper For Above Instructions

"Gone Baby Gone," directed by Ben Affleck, is a gripping exploration of morality, ethics, and choices in the face of adversity. In particular, the film’s climax revolves around Patrick Kenzie’s (played by Casey Affleck) final decision concerning the fate of Amanda McCready, a missing child. This moment encapsulates various ethical quandaries, which can be analyzed through the lens of Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy and Michael Sandel's contrasts regarding motives and intentions.

Kant's moral philosophy is predicated on three key premises: the categorical imperative, the principle of universality, and the notion of human dignity. The categorical imperative asserts that one must act only according to that maxim through which one can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law (Kant). In this film, Patrick’s final decision challenges this principle profoundly. He chooses to return Amanda to her mother, a woman who is unfit and neglectful. This act raises questions about whether Patrick’s action could be conceived as a universal moral law.

If we apply the principle of universality, one must consider whether it would be acceptable for everyone to return a child to a parent deemed unfit. If this were a universal law, it would imply that a child’s welfare is subordinate to the parent’s rights, which would lead to catastrophic outcomes for children in similar situations. Thus, Patrick’s decision does not hold up under Kant’s categorical imperative, as it fails to promote the welfare of the individual child and contradicts the very notion of moral duty to protect the vulnerable.

Moreover, the Kantian notion of human dignity emphasizes the intrinsic value of individuals. Patrick's final action suggests a disregard for Amanda's autonomy and well-being, thereby violating the moral duty to respect human dignity. In choosing to return Amanda, he undermines her right to a safe and nurturing environment, delving into a morally ambiguous territory. Kant would argue that individuals are ends in themselves and should not be used as means to achieve other ends; in this case, returning Amanda to her mother might be seen as prioritizing the mother's desires over the child's essential needs.

To delve deeper into Patrick’s motives, we can utilize Sandel’s concepts of motives, which contrast between types of moral reasoning. Sandel categorizes motives into three contrasts: the outcome versus intention, individual motives versus community, and ethical reasoning based on self-interest versus the common good. In "Gone Baby Gone," Patrick’s decision reflects a complex interplay of these motives.

Firstly, when considering the outcome versus intention, Patrick’s intention seems noble; he wishes to reunite Amanda with her biological mother. However, the outcome of this decision is detrimental to Amanda's welfare. Here, the intention does not justify the action, as Kant’s philosophy would hold that morality lies in adherence to duty rather than in good intentions, especially when those intentions lead to harm.

Secondly, regarding individual motives versus community, Patrick’s choice also implicates broader societal issues, such as the role of social services and community responsibility toward children. While he wants to act as a hero, the community must question whether one person’s decision carries adequate weight against systemic failures in child protection.

Finally, ethical reasoning based on self-interest versus the common good presents another layer of complexity. One might argue that Patrick’s choice serves his self-interest, as it allows him to distance himself from the traumatic implications of placing Amanda in foster care. He seeks comfort in the idea that he has returned her to her mother, but this overlooks the deeper ethical obligation to prioritize Amanda's long-term welfare over temporary relief of conscience.

In conclusion, Patrick’s final decision in "Gone Baby Gone" fails to align with Kant’s moral philosophy, primarily due to its disregard for the categorical imperative and human dignity. Sandel's contrasts provide a further understanding of the complexities surrounding his motivations and the implications of his action. Ultimately, while Patrick’s intention may stem from a desire to protect the child, the consequence of his action questions the moral authenticity of his choice, revealing the profound implications of ethics in personal decision-making.

References

• Kant, Immanuel. "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals." Cambridge University Press, 1997.
• Sandel, Michael J. "Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?" Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009.
• Affleck, Ben, director. "Gone Baby Gone." Miramax, 2007.
• Mack, D. "Kant's Categorical Imperative and the Principle of Humanity." Journal of Philosophy, 2015.
• Hunter, R. "The Role of Empathy in Ethical Decision-Making." Ethics and Behavior, 2014.
• Thompson, J. "Moral Philosophy and the Ethics of Care." Journal of Moral Education, 2016.
• Darwall, Stephen. "The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability." Harvard University Press, 2006.
• Hursthouse, Rosalind. "Virtue Ethics." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2012.
• Aristotle. "Nicomachean Ethics." Hackett Publishing Company, 2000.
• Foot, Philippa. "Natural Goodness." Oxford University Press, 2001.