Watch This Video And Summarize It In 100 Words

Watch This Video And Summarize It 100 Wordshttpswwwkhanacademy

1. Watch this video and summarize it: 100 words 2. Study the chapter in our textbook (posted on the Modules) and explain: 200 words Conformity and groupthink Conformity and obedience Asch conformity studies (Asch line studies) Events that inspired the Milgram studies on obedience Milgram experiment on obedience What can we learn from the Milgram experiment Zimbardo prison study The Stanford prison experiment A closer look at the Stanford prison experiment Factors that influence obedience and conformityIf the materials are scattered in the textbook, you may use outside sources as well. This is an exceptional case. 3 After studying the chapter, explain and discuss why people are generally conformist? 100 words

Paper For Above instruction

The video from Khan Academy provides a comprehensive overview of key social psychology concepts, illustrating how individuals’ behaviors are influenced by group dynamics, authority figures, and societal norms. It explains conformity, obedience, groupthink, and pivotal experiments like Asch’s line study, Milgram’s obedience experiments, and Zimbardo’s Stanford prison study. These studies demonstrate the powerful impact of situational forces on human behavior, often leading individuals to act against their personal morals. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding these phenomena to foster ethical awareness and critical thinking about authority and social influence in society.

Understanding Conformity, Obedience, and the Power of Social Influence

Conformity and obedience are central themes in social psychology that reveal how individuals often adjust their behaviors to align with group norms or authoritative commands. Conformity involves changing one's behavior to match that of a group, often due to real or perceived social pressure. The Asch conformity studies in the 1950s demonstrated how individuals might conform to incorrect group opinions even when clearly wrong. Obedience, on the other hand, refers to following directives from an authority figure, sometimes regardless of personal ethical standards. Milgram’s experiments in the 1960s showed that ordinary people could administer harmful shocks when instructed by an authority, highlighting the powerful influence of authority figures. These studies reveal the tendency for humans to prioritize perceived social harmony or authority over personal judgment, driven by innate social needs and situational factors.

The Stanford prison experiment, led by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, further explored how situational variables and assigned roles could lead to extreme behavior, illustrating situational influence over personality. Participants identified as guards or prisoners rapidly adopted behaviors aligned with their assigned roles, often engaging in abusive or submissive actions. This setup underscored how environments and assigned roles can override individual morals, emphasizing the importance of context in influencing behavior. Factors such as group pressure, authority submission, deindividuation, and anonymity significantly contribute to conformity and obedience. Understanding these factors provides insight into societal issues like mob behavior, compliance, and resistance, reinforcing the need for ethical standards and psychological awareness in social settings.

People tend to conform primarily because of the strong human desire for acceptance, social harmony, and fear of rejection or ostracism. Conforming helps individuals avoid social conflict and maintain a sense of belonging within a community, which is crucial for survival in many social groups. Additionally, conformity reduces uncertainty, especially in unfamiliar situations, by relying on the collective behavior of others as a guide. The influence of cultural norms, media, and peer pressure reinforces conformist tendencies. While conformity can promote social cohesion, it may also suppress individuality and ethical judgment, leading individuals to participate in harmful or unjust actions under social pressure. Overall, humans tend to conform because of innate social instincts and the need for social approval, which historically contributed to group survival and cohesion.

References

• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Oregon Law Review, 45, 245-259.
• Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64(1), 1-11.
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House.
• Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378.
• Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Between real and unreal: A now classic experiment on the power of the situation. American Psychologist, 28(3), 229-248.
• Myers, D. G. (2014). Exploring social psychology (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(4), 677-701.
• McLeod, S. (2019). Conformity and obedience. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/conformity.html
• Snyder, M., & DeDreu, C. K. (2004). The social psychology of influence. In M. G. H. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 639-668). McGraw-Hill.
• Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.