We Are 2 People In The Same Class So We Need Different Answe

Question

We Are 2 Persons In The Same Class So We Need Difrent Answer For Each There is an ongoing debate about responsible disclosure. Is it ethical or legal to report a vulnerability in a computer system or website? If a "White Hat Hacker" reports a vulnerability to the owner of the website, he might face legal or ethical repercussions. When Eric McCarty discovered a flaw in the USC website, the vulnerability posed significant dangers, including unauthorized access to sensitive applicant data, thereby threatening the privacy and security of individuals involved. This vulnerability could be exploited by malicious actors to steal or manipulate personal information, causing harm to students, applicants, and the university’s reputation. McCarty’s actions can be examined from multiple perspectives. His discovery was not in itself illegal, but the steps he took after finding the flaw, such as accessing the data without explicit permission, were potentially unlawful. His motivation appeared to be driven by curiosity and a desire to highlight security vulnerabilities for the sake of improving cybersecurity, not malicious intent. However, by proceeding to access protected data without authorization, he crossed legal boundaries, which raises questions about the ethical responsibilities of security researchers. Discovering security vulnerabilities without proper authorization could have broad implications. If such discoveries are met with legal action and discouragement, it may lead to a chilling effect on security research. Researchers might hesitate or refrain from reporting vulnerabilities, fearing legal repercussions or prosecution. This could result in more unpatched vulnerabilities, leaving websites and systems open to exploitation by malicious hackers. Consequently, overall cybersecurity would be compromised, increasing risks to users and organizations alike. Encouraging responsible disclosure with legal protections could promote a more secure web environment by enabling secur

Dr. Jack HW Helper · Accepted Answer

The debate surrounding responsible disclosure centers on the balance between ethical hacking and legal boundaries. Ethical hacking or white hat hacking involves security researchers identifying vulnerabilities with the intent to improve system security, often reporting these flaws to website or system owners. However, when these vulnerabilities are exploited or reported improperly, legal issues can arise, and the question of whether such actions are justified or unlawful comes under scrutiny. The case of Eric McCarty, who discovered a flaw in the USC website, exemplifies this conundrum and offers a lens through which we can analyze the ethics and legality of vulnerability reporting. Eric McCarty’s discovery posed significant dangers to the USC community, primarily due to the potential for unauthorized access to private applicant data. The vulnerability in the USC admissions website could have been exploited to access sensitive information such as personal identification details, academic records, and other confidential data. The risk was not merely theoretical; malicious actors could have used this flaw to steal identities, commit fraud, or damage USC’s reputation. The breach highlighted how vulnerable modern websites are to security lapses and the critical need for responsible disclosure practices to protect user data and institutional integrity. Analyzing McCarty’s actions reveals a nuanced distinction between ethical discovery and illegal conduct. His initial discovery of the flaw was not illegal; finding vulnerabilities in a website does not breach the law or ethical standards by itself. However, the specific conduct that may be considered illegal involves accessing, retrieving, or manipulating data beyond mere discovery—particularly if done without explicit permission. In McCarty’s case, although his intention might have been to alert USC to improve security, unauthorized access or exploitation of protected data crosses legal boundaries. He chose to delve into

We Are 2 People In The Same Class So We Need Different Answe

We Are 2 Persons In The Same Class So We Need Difrent Answer For Each

Paper For Above instruction

References

We Are 2 Persons In The Same Class So We Need Difrent Answer For Each

Paper For Above instruction

References

Related Assignments