We Are Using The Labor Market Model With Downward Rigid Wage

110 We Are Using The Labor Market Model With Downward Rigid Wages

Analyze the labor market model with downward rigid wages, exploring the explanations for wage rigidity, its impact on unemployment measurement, and the implications of declining labor demand. Discuss the different schools of thought in macroeconomics, their explanations for economic downturns and rising unemployment, and relate these to historical recessions. Examine the role of monetary policy, specifically the Federal Reserve’s use of the Federal Funds Rate, the chain of effects from policy adjustments to unemployment reduction, and how expectations influence policy effectiveness. Additionally, review the Taylor Rule as a guideline for setting interest rates, differentiate between automatic and discretionary fiscal policies with examples from recent recessions, and evaluate current monetary and fiscal measures aimed at mitigating a severe recession attributed to government-mandated shutdowns.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The dynamics of the labor market and macroeconomic policies play crucial roles in shaping economic stability and growth. The wage rigidity—particularly downward rigidity—has significant implications for unemployment and economic fluctuations. This paper delves into the reasons behind the rigidity of wages, the measurement of unemployment, the schools of macroeconomic thought, and the policy tools employed by the Federal Reserve and government to counteract recessionary pressures.

Wage Rigidity in the Labor Market

Wages often display downward rigidity due to multiple interrelated factors. One primary explanation is the presence of institutional and psychological considerations. Employment contracts, minimum wages, and labor union negotiations tend to prevent wages from decreasing freely during downturns. Managers and firms also hesitate to cut wages because of the morale and productivity impact, alongside fears of damaging employee loyalty and motivation.

Another explanation is the concept of efficiency wages, where higher wages are believed to improve productivity, reduce turnover, and foster better effort from workers. Therefore, firms may be reluctant to lower wages, even amid declining demand.

From a macroeconomic perspective, this wage rigidity affects how unemployment is measured and interpreted. When demand for labor declines but wages remain fixed at a higher level, firms may respond by reducing employment rather than lowering wages. The labor market diagram with downward rigid wages illustrates a gap between supply and demand, which corresponds directly to a rise in unemployment—precisely the measure used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Unemployment, as defined by the BLS, counts those actively seeking work but unable to find employment, reflecting excess labor supply caused by stagnant wages and reduced vacancies.

Schools of Thought in Macroeconomics

a. Main Ideas of Each School

The three dominant schools of macroeconomic thought are Keynesianism, Monetarism, and New Classical Economics.

• Keynesianism: Emphasizes the role of aggregate demand in economic fluctuations. It advocates active government intervention through fiscal and monetary policies to stabilize output and employment, especially during recessions.
• Monetarism: Focuses on controlling the money supply to maintain price stability and believes that fluctuations in the money supply primarily drive economic stability or instability. Monetarists argue for a steady, predictable increase in the money supply.
• New Classical Economics: Assumes rational expectations and market clearing in the long run. It contends that markets, including labor markets, tend toward equilibrium and that systematic policy interventions may be ineffective or even destabilizing due to expectations adjustments.

b. Explanation of Causes of Economic Downturn and Unemployment

Each school offers distinct explanations for downturns. Keynesian theory attributes recessions to insufficient aggregate demand, leading to excess capacity and unemployment. It advocates for fiscal stimulus to boost demand. Monetarists see recessions as resulting from inappropriate or unstable growth in the money supply, causing deflationary pressures and unemployment if inadequate. New Classical economists argue that unexpected shocks or policy interventions disrupt the natural market-clearing process, but rational expectations eventually neutralize policy effects, and unemployment is primarily due to real rather than nominal factors.

The 2008 Financial Crisis and Its Causes

The 2008 Great Recession stemmed from multiple causes, including excessive risk-taking in the housing market, securitization of subprime mortgages, and a weaking of financial regulation. The crisis originated from a collapse in housing prices and a subsequent credit crunch, leading to widespread layoffs and economic contraction.

From a school of thought perspective, the crisis reflects elements of monetarist and Keynesian explanations. The Federal Reserve’s failure to tighten monetary policy in the early stages, coupled with excessive optimism and moral hazard in financial markets, aligns with Monetarist themes. Simultaneously, inadequate aggregate demand following the collapse in housing wealth underscores Keynesian concerns about demand shortfalls.

Monetary Policy and the Federal Reserve

a. The Federal Funds Rate (FFR)

The Federal Funds Rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions lend reserve balances to each other overnight. It is a key benchmark for short-term interest rates and influences overall monetary conditions in the economy.

b. How the Fed Influences the FFR

The Federal Reserve influences the FFR primarily through open market operations—buying or selling government securities to affect bank reserves—and by setting the target rate itself. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) declares the target FFR, and the Fed’s trading desk conducts operations to maintain the rate within the desired range.

c. Chain of Events from Lowering FFR to Reducing Unemployment

Lowering the FFR reduces short-term borrowing costs for banks, encouraging them to lend more to businesses and consumers. Increased lending leads to more investment and spending, which boosts aggregate demand. As demand increases, firms respond by hiring more workers, thereby decreasing unemployment. The increase in employment further stimulates income and consumption, creating a positive feedback loop that stabilizes the economy. However, excessive reductions may lead to inflation or asset bubbles if not carefully managed (Extra Credit).

Expectations and Policy Effectiveness

The Federal Reserve actively manages market expectations by signaling its policy intentions through statements and forward guidance. By committing to low interest rates or other policy measures, the Fed aims to influence economic actors’ expectations about future inflation or growth, which effectively shapes current economic decisions. During crisis periods, transparent communication regarding policy paths can enhance the credibility and effectiveness of the Fed’s actions.

The Taylor Rule

The Taylor Rule is a guideline for setting the federal funds rate based on economic conditions. It suggests that the target interest rate should respond to deviations of actual inflation from the target rate and actual output from potential output. In prose, the rule recommends raising interest rates when inflation is above target or when the economy is overheating and lowering them when inflation is below target or the economy is slackening.

Mathematically, it typically formulates as: i = r + π + 0.5(π - π) + 0.5(y - y), where i is the target rate, r is the real equilibrium interest rate, π is actual inflation, π is target inflation, y is actual output, and y is potential output.

Fiscal Policy: Automatic vs Discretionary

a. Definitions and Examples

Automatic fiscal policy refers to built-in stabilizers that automatically adjust government spending and taxes in response to economic changes without direct intervention. For example, during a recession, unemployment benefits increase, and tax revenues decline automatically, providing support to aggregate demand.

Discretionary fiscal policy involves deliberate actions by policymakers, such as passing a stimulus package or increasing government spending to stimulate the economy during downturns.

b. Fiscal Policy During the Recession

During the 2008 recession, automatic stabilizers, such as unemployment benefits and tax code provisions, increased government spending support while tax revenues fell, intrinsically boosting demand. Additionally, Congress enacted discretionary measures, including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which increased government spending and tax cuts to revive economic activity.

Current Policies to Mitigate the Recession

In response to the recent deep recession caused by COVID-19 shutdowns, both monetary and fiscal policies have been aggressively employed. The Federal Reserve has reduced the FFR to nearly zero, engaged in large-scale asset purchases (quantitative easing), and provided forward guidance to keep long-term interest rates low. Fiscal authorities passed substantial stimulus packages, including direct payments to individuals, enhanced unemployment benefits, and support for businesses. These measures aim to cushion income losses, support employment, and stimulate economic activity. Nevertheless, concerns about inflation, debt sustainability, and the efficacy of these policies persist in the current economic debate.

Conclusion

The interconnectedness of wage rigidity, macroeconomic schools of thought, and policy responses underscores the complexity of managing economic downturns. Understanding the reasons behind wage rigidities helps explain persistent unemployment during recessions. Macroeconomic theories offer different perspectives on causality and appropriate policy interventions, which must be tailored to specific circumstances. The Federal Reserve’s use of interest rate adjustments and communication strategies like forward guidance, along with government fiscal actions, remain critical tools to mitigate economic crises. The current recession, partly driven by government-mandated shutdowns, exemplifies the need for coordinated monetary and fiscal policies adapted to modern challenges.

References

• Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Clarida, R., Gertler, M., & Gali, J. (2000). Monetary policy rules and the search for eternal youth. International Journal of Central Banking, 6(1), 9-30.
• Friedman, M. (1968). The Role of Monetary Policy. The American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.
• Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. Macmillan.
• Laidler, D. (2011). The Taylor Rule: A Critical Examination. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 133-154.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2016). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2009). This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press.
• Romer, D. (2012). Advanced Macroeconomics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Skott, P. (2016). Economic Growth and Structural Adjustment: An Axial View. Routledge.
• Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press.