We Have Been Looking At Different Psychological Theories

We Have Been Looking At Different Psychological Theories And The Way W

We have been examining various psychological theories and their application to social media analysis. For this assignment, you should choose yourself or another individual (such as a celebrity or politician). Spend time reviewing their social media accounts across platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Pinterest. Then, write an analysis that includes the following points: a comprehensive introduction with an overview of the individual and their social media activity; examples and discussion of schema/script theory; examples and discussion of cultivation theory; examples and discussion of agenda-setting theory; examples and discussion of social learning theory; examples and discussion of uses and gratifications theory; and a conclusion summarizing your findings.

Paper For Above instruction

The proliferation of social media platforms has revolutionized how individuals communicate, share, and consume information. Analyzing the social media activity of notable figures such as politicians or celebrities allows us to explore the psychological theories that underpin user engagement and media effects. In this paper, I will examine the social media presence of a well-known public figure, illustrating how different theories—schema/script theory, cultivation theory, agenda-setting theory, social learning theory, and uses and gratifications theory—apply to their online behavior and content dissemination.

The subject chosen for this analysis is former U.S. President Barack Obama, whose social media presence is extensive and strategically managed across platforms including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. His accounts serve as a means to communicate policies, promote social initiatives, and connect personally with followers. Obama’s social media activity exemplifies sophisticated engagement that influences public perception and opinion.

Schema/Script Theory in the Subject

Schema theory posits that individuals develop mental frameworks based on past experiences, which influence perception and interpretation of information. In Obama's social media content, we observe the application of political schemas—expectations rooted in his previous speeches and policies—that shape how followers interpret his messages. For example, when Obama discusses healthcare reforms or climate change, followers with pre-existing schemas about his presidency are more likely to interpret these messages as credible and aligned with his established image. Conversely, critics with opposing schemas may dismiss or scrutinize his statements more critically.

Script theory extends this concept by suggesting that people follow cognitive scripts in social contexts. Obama's posts often follow a narrative script emphasizing hope, progress, and unity—messages consistent with his public persona. His posts about national achievements or social justice campaigns evoke particular script expectations among his followers, reinforcing collective understanding and engagement through predictable patterns of communication.

Cultivation Theory in the Subject

Cultivation theory asserts that prolonged exposure to media shapes perceptions of reality. Obama's consistent messaging about national unity, progress, and social issues has cultivated a particular worldview among his followers. By frequently broadcasting themes of hope and collective effort, his social media accounts contribute to a cultivated perception that social change is both necessary and achievable. This repeated exposure can influence followers’ attitudes, making them more optimistic about political processes and social justice endeavors.

Furthermore, Obama’s portrayal of a united America serves to normalize certain social norms and ideals, which can perpetuate specific perceptions about race, equality, and governance. For example, his depiction of diverse communities working together fosters an inclusive worldview, aligning with cultivation theory’s idea that media shapes societal perceptions over time.

Agenda-Setting Theory in the Subject

Agenda-setting theory suggests that media don't tell people what to think, but what to think about. Obama’s strategic use of social media platforms prioritizes certain issues—climate change, healthcare, racial justice—thus influencing public discourse. By consistently highlighting these topics, his posts set the agenda for followers and media outlets alike.

For instance, during major policy announcements or social movements, Obama amplifies relevant hashtags and shares related content, elevating these issues in public consciousness. This deliberate focus fosters a sense of urgency and importance, guiding followers’ perceptions on what matters most in current social and political landscapes.

Social Learning Theory in the Subject

Social learning theory emphasizes learning behaviors through observation and imitation. Obama’s social media activity models qualities like leadership, activism, and civility. Followers observe his messages advocating for social justice, community involvement, and respect, which can encourage similar behaviors in them.

For example, Obama’s participation in campaigns like “My Brother’s Keeper” and sharing stories of grassroots efforts serve as models for followers to emulate community engagement. His discourse promotes positive social behaviors, reinforcing the idea that individuals can learn and adopt constructive attitudes through media exposure.

Uses and Gratifications Theory in the Subject

Uses and gratifications theory posits that individuals actively seek media to fulfill specific needs, such as information, entertainment, personal identity, or social connection. Obama’s social media accounts fulfill diverse needs for his followers—providing information about policies and social issues, offering inspiration and motivation, fostering a sense of community, and enabling personal identification with his leadership style.

Followers may turn to his accounts to learn about political developments, find encouragement during societal challenges, or connect with like-minded individuals. Obama’s strategic content distribution appeals to these motivations, strengthening engagement and shaping how followers perceive and relate to social issues.

Conclusions

In conclusion, analyzing Barack Obama’s social media presence through these psychological theories reveals the multifaceted ways in which media influences perceptions and behaviors. Schema and script theories demonstrate how followers interpret his messages based on pre-existing mental frameworks and narrative expectations. Cultivation theory shows how consistent messaging over time shapes collective attitudes. Agenda-setting emphasizes his role in prioritizing social issues. Social learning underscores his influence in modeling positive behaviors, while uses and gratifications highlight the active role followers play in seeking content that fulfills specific needs. Understanding these theories enhances our comprehension of social media’s profound impact on public opinion and social cognition.

References

• Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172-199.
• Shanto, S., & Weaver, D. (2003). Message effects: Advances in theory and research. Routledge.
• McQuail, D. (2010). Mass communication theory. Sage Publications.
• Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 207-226). Routledge.
• McLeod, J. M., & Rojas, H. (2007). Crisis in theory: Towards an explanation. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 678-694.
• Rubin, A. M. (2009). The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 525-548). Routledge.
• Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication & Society, 1(3-4), 175-194.
• McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.