Week 2 Project Instructions Case Study 8 Keurig Read

Week 2 Projectinstructionscase Study 8keurigread The Keurig Case Stu

Read the Keurig case study located in the section titled Case Studies in your textbook concerning the following situation: This case describes a new product success story, set in a competitive business climate. Keurig was one of the companies to commercialize an innovative technology that allowed people to brew one cup of coffee at a time. Keurig was established in 1992. The word, “Keurig,” means excellence, and it has been the guiding principle behind its products and services. Keurig patented its single serve brewing system and first entered the office coffee service, or Away From Home (AFH), marketplace in 1998.

In 2003, Keurig became one of the first to enter the At Home (AH) marketplace with a single serve brewing system designed for use in the home. By 2010, 25 percent of all coffee makers sold in the United States were Keurig branded machines. Keurig is regarded as a market leader. However, Keurig faces two major challenges. First, some patents of Keurig’s key technologies are approaching the expiration date.

Without the protection of the patents, Keurig can lose revenue from the K-Cup portion packs, thus reducing GMCR’s coffee sales. Keurig can also lose royalties from other roaster coffee sales using Keurig’s technology. The second challenge is the perceived environmental impact of the K-Cup portion packs. It will need to be addressed to prevent erosion of Keurig’s position in the marketplace. An evaluation of Keurig’s business-level strategy, competitive rivalry, and SWOT analysis will aid in the discussion and weighing of strategic options available to Keurig.

The results of the analysis can then be used to establish and support a strong set of recommendations seeking to ensure a continuation of Keurig’s strong performance and top market position. Assess Keurig’s business-level strategy. Has the company’s business-level strategy been successful? How does Keurig’s strategy stand up against competitive rivalry in the industry? Review the important elements of Keurig’s external and internal environments.

Analyze key factors in the SWOT analysis. Evaluate Keurig’s international strategy and its use of alliances to achieve company objectives. Weigh the challenges confronting Keurig. What are the greatest risks for Keurig? What recommendations can be made to support Keurig’s growth and profitability objectives?

Submission Details: Present your analysis as a 3–4-page report in a Microsoft Word document formatted in APA style. Support your responses with examples. Cite any sources in APA format. Name your document MGT4070_W2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

Paper For Above instruction

Assessing Keurig's Business Strategy and Strategic Challenges

Keurig’s emergence as a dominant player in the single-serve coffee market exemplifies a successful business-level strategy rooted in innovation, differentiation, and market expansion. Since its inception in 1992, Keurig has capitalized on its patented brewing technology to create a niche for itself in both the commercial and consumer markets. The company's strategic focus on product innovation, brand positioning, and strategic partnerships has allowed it to secure a leading market share.

The company's business-level strategy aligns with Michael Porter’s generic strategies of differentiation—offering a unique product that provides convenience and consistency. Keurig's initial success stemmed from leveraging proprietary technology, enabling the firm to differentiate itself from traditional coffee makers. This strategy translated well, with Keurig capturing approximately 25% of the U.S. coffee maker market by 2010, illustrating its effectiveness in positioning itself as a premium, innovative brand. The company also adopted an effective market penetration strategy by initially targeting office coffee service (AFH) markets before expanding into the at-home (AH) segment.

However, the company's strategy faces considerable competitive rivalry. The coffee machine industry comprises well-established brands like Mr. Coffee, Nestlé, and emerging private-label brands, all vying for market share. Competitors are attempting to develop comparable single-serve brewing systems, putting pressure on Keurig’s technological and market advantage. Additionally, the impending expiration of key patents poses a significant threat. Without patent protection, competitors could produce compatible K-Cup style packs, eroding Keurig’s revenue streams and reducing its market dominance. The loss of royalty income from licensed coffee roasters could further diminish profitability.

Assessing Keurig’s external environment through PESTEL analysis reveals critical factors. Politically, regulations regarding environmental sustainability and waste management trends influence product development. Economically, consumer willingness to pay premium prices for convenience sustains Keurig’s sales, though economic downturns might impact discretionary spending. Socially, increased environmental consciousness presents challenges, especially given the environmental impact of disposable K-Cups. Technological advancements of rivals threaten Keurig’s technological edge, while legal issues around patent expirations add uncertainty. Environmentally, K-Cups contribute significant waste, challenging Keurig’s sustainability claims and influencing consumer perceptions and regulatory policies.

The company's internal environment also warrants analysis through SWOT. Strengths include its innovative technology, strong brand recognition, and established distribution channels. Weaknesses comprise reliance on patent protections and environmental criticisms regarding K-Cup waste. Opportunities lie in developing biodegradable K-Cups, expanding into international markets, and forming strategic alliances. Threats include patent expiration, intense competition, and environmental regulations.

Regarding its international strategy, Keurig has primarily focused on the U.S. market but has begun exploring opportunities in Canada and Europe, where coffee consumption patterns favor single-serve systems. Alliances with global coffee brands could facilitate international expansion and supply chain efficiencies. Nonetheless, Keurig's reliance on strategic alliances with major coffee roasters presents both growth opportunities and risks if partnerships dissolve or become less favorable.

The most significant risks facing Keurig include patent expiration leading to increased competition, environmental backlash affecting brand reputation, and supply chain disruptions. To sustain growth, Keurig must invest in sustainable product development, diversify its patent portfolio, and strengthen its global footprint through strategic alliances. Additionally, investing in environmentally friendly packaging and educating consumers about sustainability initiatives can reinforce Keurig’s brand value.

In conclusion, Keurig’s business-level strategy has historically been successful, driven by innovation and market focus. However, upcoming challenges necessitate strategic adaptations—particularly emphasizing environmental sustainability, patent strategy, and global expansion—to safeguard its market leadership and profitability in an evolving competitive landscape.

References

• Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (2004). Business marketing: Understand what customers value. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 86-93.
• Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• Schilling, M. A. (2020). Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Supply Chain Dive. (2022). Environmental concerns surrounding coffee pods. https://www.supplychaindive.com/news/coffee-pod-environmental-impact/614203/
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Waste Management and Recycling. https://www.epa.gov/waste
• Yoffie, D. B., & Kim, R. (2020). Apple Inc. in 2020. Harvard Business School Case.
• Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm. McGraw-Hill Education.