Week 6 Assignment 2 APA Format 12 To 14 Pages Due Saturday

Week 6 Assignment 2apa Format 12 To 14 Pages Due Saturday July 11th By

Using the resources provided for you below under: References, the literature review outline (which is uploaded in a Word document named project_scholarly_resources.doc), craft a 12 to 14-page draft literature review. The literature review must include at least 25 relevant scholarly articles, including the 8 listed under References, research reports, or other academic sources. Follow the literature review guidelines provided in the Machi and McEvoy text.

Adhere strictly to APA guidelines for citations and formatting. Ensure your paper covers the key components of a comprehensive literature review, including critical analysis and synthesis of sources, identification of research gaps, and clear organization around your research focus. Use the provided resources and the outline to structure your review appropriately.

Submit your completed draft by Saturday, July 11th at 8 PM New York time.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of a thorough and well-structured literature review is a crucial step in the research process. It involves critically analyzing existing scholarly work to establish a foundation for new research, identifying gaps, and justifying the significance of the study. This paper presents a 12 to 14-page draft literature review following the specific guidelines outlined in Machi and McEvoy's work, emphasizing systematic organization, critical synthesis, and adherence to APA formatting.

The purpose of this literature review is to explore the current state of research on [Your Research Topic], integrating findings from at least 25 scholarly articles, reports, and academic sources. The review begins with an introduction that contextualizes the research problem, followed by thematic sections that synthesize the literature based on key themes or variables. Each section critically evaluates the sources, highlighting agreements, disagreements, methodological strengths, and weaknesses. Throughout, the review identifies research gaps and proposes directions for future research.

Following Machi and McEvoy's guidance on writing the review, the paper emphasizes clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor. It begins with defining the scope and criteria for selecting sources, with careful justification for inclusion. The synthesis illustrates how existing work informs the research questions, framing the significance of the current study. Proper APA formatting is maintained throughout, including in-text citations and references.

The outline provided in the resource document guides the logical flow of the review, covering necessary components such as research theories, methodologies, and findings relevant to the topic. The final draft aims to serve as a comprehensive yet concise overview, leading to the identification of specific gaps that the current research intends to address.

In conclusion, this literature review will demonstrate thorough engagement with scholarly literature, critical analysis, and a clear strategy for positioning the current research within the existing academic landscape. This draft will lay a solid foundation for subsequent stages of research, including methodology and analysis, ensuring a cohesive and scholarly presentation aligned with academic standards.

References

  • Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft of research (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2012). The literature review: Six steps to success (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Johnson, B., & Reeves, B. (2005). Challenges in online teaching: A review of research literature. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Minnesota Duluth. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Maguire, L. L. (2005). Faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from [URL]
  • Laureate Education (Producer). (2012a). Introduction to scholarly writing: Purpose, audience and evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
  • Gleissner, J. D. (2012). Recidivism - Its Causes and Cure. correctons.com. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Gornik, M. (n.d.). Moving from correctional program to correctional strategy: Using proven practices to change criminal behaviour, 1-14. Retrieved from [URL]
  • Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(4), 353–375.
  • Recidivism. (2014). National Institute of Justice. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from [URL]
  • Developing a Research Question. (n.d.). Empire State College. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from [URL]

Related Assignments