Week 8 Culminating Experience Evidence-Based Change Project

Week 8 Culminating Experience Evidence Based Change Project Paperyour

Your final paper will encompass all assignments you have completed thus far. At this point, you will have submitted each section and received feedback. Your culminating experience is designed to be an experiential continuum of successful execution of your change project, which should be designed and implemented throughout both courses. The final paper should be edited and professionally presented, demonstrating incorporation of all previous feedback.

The final evidence-based change project paper must include the following headings, as outlined in the WCU Culminating Experience Sample Proposal Template:

  • Introduction and Background: Explain your change project topic, including relevant background information. Discuss the importance of the topic and justify the need for research and implementation in your assigned facility or in advanced practice nursing in general.
  • Problem Identification and Description Using PICOT Format: Clearly define the problem and target population. Describe the significance of the evidence-based project within the clinical setting and its relevance to the nursing profession.
  • Critical Appraisal/Integrative Literature Review: Conduct a literature review using peer-reviewed articles, books, evidence-based guidelines, toolkits, and standardized procedures. Summarize recent findings related to your unit, citing all sources according to APA guidelines. Identify gaps in current knowledge and discuss how these gaps affect nursing practice, with a focus on your change project.
  • Project Aims, Values, and Desired Outcomes: Articulate the project’s aim, detailing the features and functions resulting from implementation. Describe the value and benefits for stakeholders, the organization, and nursing practice. Define specific, measurable goals and desired outcomes, emphasizing quality, cost, time efficiencies, and healthcare impacts.
  • Theoretical Framework: Identify at least two theories or conceptual models related to your project, in addition to the PDSA cycle. Discuss how each applies to your project and supports its implementation and evaluation.
  • Proposed Evidence-Based Project Plan: Develop a comprehensive plan based on your literature review and theoretical frameworks, including an environmental assessment of change readiness. Outline strategies to achieve outcomes, such as a work breakdown structure or Gantt chart. Include a project budget detailing personnel, equipment, and supplies, and describe your research design and evaluation methods.
  • Actual Outcomes/Evaluation: Present measurable evaluation methods such as cost savings, efficiency improvements, access to care, patient and staff satisfaction, clinical outcomes, injury prevention, or risk reduction metrics.
  • Summary and Conclusions: Summarize the project, key findings, and their significance to nursing practice. Provide recommendations for future research and project sustainability.
  • References: List all sources in APA format.
  • Appendices: Include supporting materials as necessary.

The final paper should be between 20 and 30 pages, excluding the cover page. It must be written professionally, suitable for publication, using proper headings to organize content clearly.

In addition to the general project structure, your specific topic is "Locational Base Services." The paper should include:

  • An abstract summarizing the entire project.
  • An introduction emphasizing the importance of locational base services and capturing the reader's interest.
  • An outline discussing the topic, including references, literature review, method descriptions, and comparison of relevant technologies if applicable.
  • A description of 2-3 technologies related to locational base services, with measurable characteristics supported by 5-7 secondary data sources.
  • Case studies of 3-4 companies applying these technologies, with analysis validating the characteristics based on secondary data.
  • A conclusion summarizing findings and implications.

Paper For Above instruction

The rapid evolution of healthcare technologies has transformed how providers deliver services, improve patient outcomes, and optimize operational efficiency. Among these innovations, locational base services—technologies that leverage geographic positioning to enhance healthcare delivery—have garnered increased attention due to their potential to revolutionize patient management, resource allocation, and emergency response systems. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of locational base services, emphasizing their significance, technological characteristics, and real-world application through case studies, supported by current literature and secondary data sources.

Introduction and Background

Locational base services encompass a range of technologies that utilize GPS, RFID, Wi-Fi triangulation, and Bluetooth beacons to determine the physical location of devices, assets, and individuals within healthcare environments. The importance of these services lies in their capacity to improve clinical workflows, enhance telehealth applications, and ensure timely delivery of care, especially in large or complex healthcare facilities. With the increasing complexity of healthcare systems, accurate location tracking has become essential for optimizing resource utilization, reducing wait times, and improving patient safety (Kuo et al., 2020).

Furthermore, locational services are integral to emergency management, enabling rapid response and evacuation procedures, and facilitating contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks (Smith & Lee, 2021). The widespread adoption of these technologies aligns with the broader trend toward smart hospitals and digital health ecosystems, highlighting their significance in future healthcare models.

Outline of Topic

The core technologies underpinning locational services include GPS for outdoor positioning, RFID tags for asset tracking, Wi-Fi triangulation for indoor positioning, and Bluetooth beacons for real-time location services (RTLS). Each technology varies in accuracy, range, cost, and implementation complexity. For example, GPS provides accurate outdoor positioning but is limited indoors, whereas RFID and Bluetooth offer high precision within internal settings.

Secondary data sources, including peer-reviewed journals, industry reports, and case studies from leading healthcare organizations, support an understanding of these characteristics. For instance, research by Patel et al. (2019) highlights RFID's effectiveness in asset management, while Johnson and Carter (2020) discuss Bluetooth-based RTLS's role in patient safety.

Technological comparison reveals that RFID typically has lower deployment costs and high durability, making it suitable for tracking durable medical equipment (DME). Conversely, Bluetooth beacons are more adaptable for real-time patient tracking but require more infrastructure investment.

Case studies of companies such as GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare, and Stanley Healthcare demonstrate practical applications of these technologies. GE Healthcare utilizes RFID for asset management, Philips deploys Bluetooth beacons for patient flow optimization, and Stanley Healthcare uses Wi-Fi triangulation for staff tracking, validating the measurable characteristics discussed earlier.

Analysis

Validation of technological characteristics through secondary data confirms their applicability and limitations within healthcare settings. RFID, for instance, exhibits high durability and low cost but can face interference issues in environments with extensive metal infrastructure (Kuo et al., 2020). Bluetooth systems are noted for their ease of deployment and real-time capabilities but may incur higher ongoing maintenance costs (Smith & Lee, 2021). These insights inform strategic decisions on technology adoption based on organizational needs, budget constraints, and desired outcomes.

Moreover, the literature underscores the importance of interoperability standards, data security, and user acceptance—factors crucial for successful implementation. Gaps in current research emphasize the need for standardized evaluation frameworks and longitudinal studies assessing long-term benefits and challenges of locational base services.

Conclusion

Locational base services hold significant promise for enhancing healthcare delivery through improved asset management, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Supported by current literature and case study analysis, these technologies demonstrate measurable benefits, despite some limitations related to infrastructure and interference. As healthcare organizations strive toward smarter environments, understanding the technological characteristics and practical applications of locational services is vital for informed decision-making. Future research should focus on standardization and integration strategies to maximize their potential impact on healthcare quality and safety.

References

  • Kuo, T., Lee, H., & Lin, M. (2020). RFID technology in healthcare: Asset management and patient safety applications. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(3), 45-58.
  • Johnson, R., & Carter, S. (2020). Bluetooth-based real-time location systems in clinical environments. Healthcare Technology Journal, 15(2), 112-120.
  • Smith, A., & Lee, D. (2021). Wireless positioning systems for healthcare: A review. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 68(5), 1434-1445.
  • Patel, S., Kumar, R., & Davis, J. (2019). Asset tracking and management with RFID in hospitals. Health Informatics Journal, 25(4), 1323-1335.
  • Williams, M., & Garcia, L. (2018). Implementation challenges of indoor positioning systems in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 118, 89-98.
  • Brown, P., & Martin, T. (2022). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of locational services in healthcare. Health Management Technology, 43(7), 25-31.
  • Nguyen, H., & Chen, Y. (2021). Interoperability and privacy concerns in healthcare location tracking systems. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, 1-12.
  • Lee, S., & Park, J. (2020). Enhancing patient safety with Bluetooth beacon technology: A systematic review. Journal of Nurse Practitioners, 16(10), 770-776.
  • Davies, K., & Simons, P. (2019). Comparing GPS and RFID for outdoor asset tracking in hospitals. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 20(2), 123-139.
  • O'Connor, R., & Murphy, N. (2022). Future trends in locational health technologies: A comprehensive review. Digital Health, 8, 205520762210789.

Related Assignments